This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mascini, E. M. Articles by Troelstra, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mascini, E. M. Articles by Troelstra, A.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, December 2003, p. 5377-5383, Vol. 41, No. 12
0095-1137/03/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.41.12.5377-5383.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Acquisition and Duration of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcal Carriage in Relation to Strain Type

E. M. Mascini,^1* K. P. Jalink,¹ T. E. M. Kamp-Hopmans,¹ H. E. M. Blok,¹ J. Verhoef,¹ M. J. M. Bonten,^1,2 and A. Troelstra¹

Department of Hospital Hygiene and Infection Prevention, Eijkman-Winkler Centre for Microbiology, Infectious Diseases, and Inflammation,¹ Acute Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Division of Internal Medicine and Dermatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands²

Received 13 February 2003/ Returned for modification 30 April 2003/ Accepted 20 June 2003

In May 2000, the first outbreak of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREF) was detected in the University Medical Center Utrecht in the nephrology ward. The question arose why some VREF strains spread among hospitalized patients, whereas other strains do not. Thirty patients who were found to be colonized with VREF between May and November 2000 were included in the study. Molecular typing confirmed that 19 of them carried an identical epidemic strain which harbored the esp gene while 11 were colonized by nonepidemic strains that were all esp negative. Acquisition of the outbreak strain was significantly associated with diabetes mellitus, renal transplantation, and extensive use of antibiotics, especially cephalosporins, in the 2-month period before the first isolation of VREF. To establish the duration of colonization, prospective surveillance of VREF carriage for a 6-month period starting from the first isolation of VREF was realized for 20 patients. After 6 months, VREF was still recovered from 60% of carriers of the outbreak strain versus 20% of carriers of nonepidemic strains (P < 0.01). However, antibiotic use during the follow-up period was significantly higher by carriers of the outbreak strain than by carriers of nonepidemic strains. The fact that the outbreak strain was recovered for a longer period of time than nonepidemic strains may facilitate dissemination of the strain. The results support a careful restrictive antibiotic policy for wards at risk for spread of VREF and implementation of isolation precautions for patients who are colonized with esp-positive outbreak strains.

---

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Hospital Hygiene and Infection Prevention, HP G 04.614, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands. Phone: 31-30-2507625. Fax: 31-30-2541770. E-mail: E.M.Mascini{at}lab.azu.nl.

---

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, December 2003, p. 5377-5383, Vol. 41, No. 12
0095-1137/03/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.41.12.5377-5383.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Ruiz-Garbajosa, P., del Campo, R., Coque, T. M., Asensio, A., Bonten, M., Willems, R., Baquero, F., Canton, R. (2009). Longer Intestinal Persistence of Enterococcus faecalis Compared to Enterococcus faecium Clones in Intensive-Care-Unit Patients. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47: 345-351 [Abstract] [Full Text]