This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Klutts, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Gronowski, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Klutts, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Gronowski, A. M.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, November 2004, p. 4996-5000, Vol. 42, No. 11
0095-1137/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.11.4996-5000.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Evaluation of a Multiplexed Bead Assay for Assessment of Epstein-Barr Virus Immunologic Status

J. S. Klutts, R. S. Liao, W. M. Dunne Jr., and A. M. Gronowski*

Department of Pathology and Immunology, Division of Laboratory Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri

Received 16 March 2004/ Returned for modification 22 May 2004/ Accepted 2 July 2004

Currently, serological assays using either indirect immunofluorescence assay or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) are performed to evaluate the status of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection in humans. Although these methods are reliable, they are limited to testing an antibody response to a single viral antigen per reaction, thus necessitating a panel of assays to complete the evaluation. In contrast, a new bead-based method (BioPlex 2200; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, Calif.) can analyze the humoral response to multiple antigens in a single tube. This approach potentially reduces overall cost, turnaround time, and sample volume. The aim of this study was to evaluate the multiplexed EBV serologic assays performed on the BioPlex 2200 platform compared to results of conventional heterophile and ELISA-based assays. A total of 167 nonconsecutive, stored serum samples from adult and pediatric patients submitted for EBV serologic studies were used in the evaluation. Concordance between results generated by the BioPlex 2200 system and conventional assays was calculated. The anti-EA-D assay had the lowest concordance at 91%. The BioPlex 2200 system showed 97% agreement with conventional heterophile and anti-nuclear antigen assays and 92% agreement with the anti-VCA IgG and immunoglobulin M assays. Agreement between the BioPlex 2200 system and conventional testing was 92% with respect to categorization of acute versus nonacute EBV disease. The correlation between these two systems with regard to assignment into one of four categories of EBV status was also good (82%). In summary, there is excellent correlation between contemporary EBV serologic testing and the BioPlex 2200 system.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid, Box 8118, St. Louis, MO 63110. Phone: (314) 362-0194. Fax: (314) 362-1461. E-mail: gronowsk{at}pathbox.wustl.edu.


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, November 2004, p. 4996-5000, Vol. 42, No. 11
0095-1137/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.11.4996-5000.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Gu, A.-D., Mo, H.-Y., Xie, Y.-B., Peng, R.-J., Bei, J.-X., Peng, J., Li, M.-Y., Chen, L.-Z., Feng, Q.-S., Jia, W.-H., Zeng, Y.-X. (2008). Evaluation of a Multianalyte Profiling Assay and an Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Serological Examination of Epstein-Barr Virus-Specific Antibody Responses in Diagnosis of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. CVI 15: 1684-1688 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Binnicker, M. J., Jespersen, D. J., Harring, J. A., Rollins, L. O., Beito, E. M. (2008). Evaluation of a Multiplex Flow Immunoassay for Detection of Epstein-Barr Virus-Specific Antibodies. CVI 15: 1410-1413 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Gu, A.-D., Xie, Y.-B., Mo, H.-Y., Jia, W.-H., Li, M.-Y., Li, M., Chen, L.-Z., Feng, Q.-S., Liu, Q., Qian, C.-N., Zeng, Y.-X. (2008). Antibodies against Epstein-Barr virus gp78 antigen: a novel marker for serological diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma detected by xMAP technology. J. Gen. Virol. 89: 1152-1158 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Binder, S. (2006). Autoantibody Detection Using Multiplex Technologies. Lupus 15: 412-421 [Abstract]  
  • Binder, S. R., Genovese, M. C., Merrill, J. T., Morris, R. I., Metzger, A. L. (2005). Computer-Assisted Pattern Recognition of Autoantibody Results. CVI 12: 1353-1357 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kaul, R., Chen, P., Binder, S. R. (2004). Detection of Immunoglobulin M Antibodies Specific for Toxoplasma gondii with Increased Selectivity for Recently Acquired Infections. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 5705-5709 [Abstract] [Full Text]