This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Koenig, M. G. Articles by Heath, D. G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Koenig, M. G. Articles by Heath, D. G.

Direct Comparison of the BD ProbeTec ET System with In-House LightCycler PCR Assays for Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae from Clinical Specimens

Landstuhl Regional Medical Center, Landstuhl, Germany

Received 19 April 2004/ Returned for modification 13 June 2004/ Accepted 3 August 2004

The commercial BD ProbeTec ET (BDPT) system for the detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis from clinical specimens was compared with our in-house LightCycler real-time PCR (LC-PCR) assays. Specimens initially positive by the BDPT system were retested by our LC-PCR assays. Our results for C. trachomatis testing indicate a 91.2% agreement when the results of 114 clinical specimens, initially positive by BDPT over a wide range of method-other-than-acceleration (MOTA) scores, were retested by our LC-PCR assay. The agreement between the two systems improved to 96% when only MOTA scores of >30,000 were retested by the LC-PCR assay. The overall agreement between the two systems for Neisseria gonorrhoeae detection from 155 clinical specimens was only 77.4%, with agreement particularly low (24.1%) for MOTA scores ranging from 2,000 to 19,999. Repeat testing of specimens with the BDPT only closely correlated with that seen by others demonstrating that reproducibility of the BDPT system for specimens initially within the MOTA score range from 2,000 to 9,999 is problematic, especially for Neisseria gonorrhoeae testing. With our study, we proposed an algorithm for C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae testing which involves screening with the BDPT system followed by selective use of our in-house LC-PCR assays.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Goldschmidt, P, Rostane, H, Sow, M, Goepogui, A, Batellier, L, Chaumeil, C (2006). Detection by broad-range real-time PCR assay of Chlamydia species infecting human and animals. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 90: 1425-1429 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Whiley, D. M., Tapsall, J. W., Sloots, T. P. (2006). Nucleic Acid Amplification Testing for Neisseria gonorrhoeae: An Ongoing Challenge. J. Mol. Diagn. 8: 3-15 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Jalal, H., Stephen, H., Curran, M. D., Burton, J., Bradley, M., Carne, C. (2006). Development and Validation of a Rotor-Gene Real-Time PCR Assay for Detection, Identification, and Quantification of Chlamydia trachomatis in a Single Reaction. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44: 206-213 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Geraats-Peters, C. W. M., Brouwers, M., Schneeberger, P. M., van der Zanden, A. G. M., Bruisten, S. M., Weers-Pothoff, G., Boel, C. H. E., van den Brule, A. J. C., Harmsen, H. G., Hermans, M. H. A. (2005). Specific and Sensitive Detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Clinical Specimens by Real-Time PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 5653-5659 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Tapsall, J. W., Limnios, E. A., Nguyen, N. L., Carter, I., Lum, G., Freeman, K., Tabrizi, S. N., Garland, S. M., Whiley, D. M., Sloots, T. P., Chambers, I. W. (2005). Cryptic-Plasmid-Free Gonococci May Contribute to Failure of cppB Gene-Based Assays To Confirm Results of BD ProbeTEC PCR for Identification of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 2036-2037 [Full Text]