This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Herrmann, B. Articles by Blomberg, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Herrmann, B. Articles by Blomberg, J.

Comparison of a Duplex Quantitative Real-Time PCR Assay and the COBAS Amplicor CMV Monitor Test for Detection of Cytomegalovirus

Sections of Virology,¹ Infectious Diseases, Department of Medical Sciences,² Section of Pediatrics, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala,³ Department of Clinical Virology, Huddinge University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden⁴

Received 4 July 2003/ Returned for modification 7 September 2003/ Accepted 16 February 2004

A duplex quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) assay was designed to detect both the polymerase gene (pol) and the glycoprotein gene (gB) of cytomegalovirus (CMV). The detection limit of the qPCR was determined to be 1 to 3 copies/reaction and the linear measure interval was 10³ to 10⁸ copies/ml. The qPCR system was compared to the COBAS Amplicor CMV Monitor test (COBAS) by an analysis of 138 plasma samples. Both systems detected CMV in 71 cases and had negative results for 33 samples. In addition, 34 samples were positive by qPCR and negative by the COBAS assay, but in no case was the COBAS result positive and the qPCR result negative. Thus, qPCR detected 48% more positive cases than the COBAS method. For samples with 10⁵ copies/ml by qPCR, a saturation effect was seen in the COBAS assay and quantification required dilution. Copy numbers for pol and gB by qPCR generally agreed. However, the reproducibility of qPCR assays and the need for an international standard are discussed. Discrepant copy numbers for pol and gB by qPCR were found for samples from two patients, and sequence analysis revealed that the corresponding CMV strains were mismatched at four nucleotide positions compared with the gB fragment primer sequences. In conclusion, a duplex qPCR assay in a real-time format facilitates quantitative measurements and minimizes the risk of false-negative results.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Lengerova, M., Racil, Z., Volfova, P., Lochmanova, J., Berkovcova, J., Dvorakova, D., Vorlicek, J., Mayer, J. (2007). Real-Time PCR Diagnostics Failure Caused by Nucleotide Variability within Exon 4 of the Human Cytomegalovirus Major Immediate-Early Gene. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45: 1042-1044 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Espy, M. J., Uhl, J. R., Sloan, L. M., Buckwalter, S. P., Jones, M. F., Vetter, E. A., Yao, J. D. C., Wengenack, N. L., Rosenblatt, J. E., Cockerill, F. R. III, Smith, T. F. (2006). Real-Time PCR in Clinical Microbiology: Applications for Routine Laboratory Testing. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 19: 165-256 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Nye, M. B., Leman, A. R., Meyer, M. E., Menegus, M. A., Rothberg, P. G. (2005). Sequence Diversity in the Glycoprotein B Gene Complicates Real-Time PCR Assays for Detection and Quantification of Cytomegalovirus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 4968-4971 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Wirgart, B. Z., Andersson, P., Grillner, L. (2005). Evaluation of the ReSSQ Assay in Relation to the COBAS AMPLICOR CMV MONITOR Test and an In-House Nested PCR Method for Detection of Cytomegalovirus DNA. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 4057-4063 [Abstract] [Full Text]