This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burton-MacLeod, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ando, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Burton-MacLeod, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ando, T.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, June 2004, p. 2587-2595, Vol. 42, No. 6
0095-1137/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.6.2587-2595.2004

Evaluation and Comparison of Two Commercial Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Kits for Detection of Antigenically Diverse Human Noroviruses in Stool Samples

Jonathan A. Burton-MacLeod,{dagger} Erin M. Kane,{ddagger} Rachel S. Beard, Leslie A. Hadley, Roger I. Glass, and Tamie Ando*

Respiratory and Enteric Viruses Branch, Division of Viral and Rickettsial Diseases, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia

Received 1 December 2003/ Returned for modification 9 February 2004/ Accepted 9 March 2004

Two recently commercialized enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits, the SRSV(II)-AD (Denka Seiken Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and IDEIA NLV (DakoCytomation Ltd., Ely, United Kingdom) kits, that detect human norovirus (HuNV) antigens in stool samples were evaluated to assess whether they could be used instead of reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) for routine diagnosis. The sensitivities and specificities of the two kits were tested with a panel of 103 stool samples containing HuNVs of 4 and 10 genetic subgroups within genogroups I and II (GI and GII), respectively, and 39 stool samples containing other enteric viruses. The Denka kit had a high sensitivity (>70% for 10 of the 14 subgroups) but a specificity of only 69%, and the Dako kit had a low sensitivity (<30% for 6 GII subgroups) but a high specificity of 100%. Statistical analysis suggests that HuNVs of four subgroups (subgroups GII/2, GII/5, GII/6, and GII/n) are likely to elude detection by the Dako kit. The two kits also demonstrated differences in reactivities. While the Dako kit discriminated between the GI and GII antigens of HuNVs, the Denka kit cross-reacted with samples containing all GI and GII subgroups of HuNVs. Moreover, the Denka kit also reacted with samples containing human sapovirus (HuSV). We demonstrate that the cross-reactivity of the Denka kit is not due to specific reactions with HuNV and HuSV antigens. These results indicate that neither the Denka kit nor the Dako kit has all the performance characteristics required to replace the RT-PCR methods used to detect HuNVs.

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Respiratory and Enteric Viruses Branch, Division of Viral and Rickettsial Diseases, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Mail Stop GO4, 1600 Clifton Rd., Atlanta, GA 30333. Phone: (404) 639-2396. Fax: (404) 639-3645. E-mail: txa5{at}cdc.gov.

{dagger} Present address: Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario K7M 2B9, Canada.

{ddagger} Present address: Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, June 2004, p. 2587-2595, Vol. 42, No. 6
0095-1137/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.6.2587-2595.2004




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Gray, J. J., Kohli, E., Ruggeri, F. M., Vennema, H., Sanchez-Fauquier, A., Schreier, E., Gallimore, C. I., Iturriza-Gomara, M., Giraudon, H., Pothier, P., Di Bartolo, I., Inglese, N., de Bruin, E., van der Veer, B., Moreno, S., Montero, V., de Llano, M. C., Hohne, M., Diedrich, S. M. (2007). European Multicenter Evaluation of Commercial Enzyme Immunoassays for Detecting Norovirus Antigen in Fecal Samples. CVI 14: 1349-1355 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Okitsu-Negishi, S., Okame, M., Shimizu, Y., Phan, T. G., Tomaru, T., Kamijo, S., Sato, T., Yagyu, F., Muller, W. E. G., Ushijima, H. (2006). Detection of norovirus antigens from recombinant virus-like particles and stool samples by a commercial norovirus enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit.. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44: 3784-3786 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Trujillo, A. A., McCaustland, K. A., Zheng, D.-P., Hadley, L. A., Vaughn, G., Adams, S. M., Ando, T., Glass, R. I., Monroe, S. S. (2006). Use of TaqMan Real-Time Reverse Transcription-PCR for Rapid Detection, Quantification, and Typing of Norovirus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44: 1405-1412 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Bull, R. A., Tu, E. T. V., McIver, C. J., Rawlinson, W. D., White, P. A. (2006). Emergence of a New Norovirus Genotype II.4 Variant Associated with Global Outbreaks of Gastroenteritis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44: 327-333 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Parker, T. D., Kitamoto, N., Tanaka, T., Hutson, A. M., Estes, M. K. (2005). Identification of Genogroup I and Genogroup II Broadly Reactive Epitopes on the Norovirus Capsid. J. Virol. 79: 7402-7409 [Abstract] [Full Text]  


Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»