JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maaroufi, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Crokaert, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maaroufi, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Crokaert, F.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, July 2004, p. 3159-3163, Vol. 42, No. 7
0095-1137/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.7.3159-3163.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Comparison of Different Methods of Isolation of DNA of Commonly Encountered Candida Species and Its Quantitation by Using a Real-Time PCR-Based Assay

Younes Maaroufi, Naïma Ahariz, Mireille Husson, and Françoise Crokaert*

Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Institut Jules Bordet, 1000 Brussels, Belgium

Received 3 November 2003/ Returned for modification 9 January 2004/ Accepted 28 March 2004

Molecular diagnosis based on genomic amplification methods such as real-time PCR assay has been reported as an alternative to conventional culture for early detection of invasive candidiasis. However, a major limitation of the molecular method is the difficulty associated with breaking fungal cell walls since the DNA extraction step still requires more than half of a working day. It has been suggested that PCR detection of free template DNA in serum is preferred over the use of whole blood for the diagnosis of systemic candidiasis. In this study, two conventional procedures (the first [the HLGT method] consists of boiling sera in an alkaline guanidine-phenol-Tris reagent, and the second [the PKPC method] uses proteinase K digestion, followed by organic extraction) and three commercially available kits for DNA isolation were evaluated for sensitivity, purity, cost, and use of template for most clinically important Candida species in a TaqMan-based PCR assay. To optimize these procedures, we evaluated the effect of adding 0.5% bovine serum albumin to DNA extracts and found that it decreased the effects of inhibitors. The QIAamp DNA blood kit did significantly shorten the duration of the DNA isolation but was among the most expensive procedures. Furthermore, the QIAamp DNA blood kit proved to be as sensitive as the HLGT DNA isolation method for PCR amplification from 52 serum samples from hematology or oncology patients with clinically proven or suspected systemic Candida infections. All PCR-positive samples showed approximately the same Candida species load by both procedures (100% correspondence), whereas one discordant result was obtained between PCR and blood culture.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Institut Jules Bordet, Rue Héger-Bordet 1, 1000 Brussels, Belgium. Phone: 322-541-3700/3706. Fax: 322-541-3295. E-mail: fcrokaer{at}ulb.ac.be.


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, July 2004, p. 3159-3163, Vol. 42, No. 7
0095-1137/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.7.3159-3163.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2004 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.