JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maraha, B.
Right arrow Articles by van der Zee, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maraha, B.
Right arrow Articles by van der Zee, A.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, September 2004, p. 3937-3941, Vol. 42, No. 9
0095-1137/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.9.3937-3941.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Is the Perceived Association between Chlamydia pneumoniae and Vascular Diseases Biased by Methodology?

Boulos Maraha,1* Hans Berg,2 Marjolein Kerver,2 Steef Kranendonk,3 Jaap Hamming,4 Jan Kluytmans,5 Marcel Peeters,2 and Anneke van der Zee2

Regional Laboratory of Medical Microbiology, Dordrecht-Gorinchem,1 Department of Clinical Microbiology,2 Department of Surgery, St. Elisabeth Hospital,4 Department of Surgery, TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg,3 Department of Clinical Microbiology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands5

Received 7 December 2003/ Returned for modification 26 January 2004/ Accepted 28 March 2004

Inter- and intralaboratory inconsistencies in detection rates of Chlamydia pneumoniae in vascular specimens have been demonstrated. In this study, 66 vascular tissue specimens from 66 patients with vascular disease were tested by three PCR assays: a 16S PCR-based reverse line blot (RLB) assay, a single-step PCR, and a nested PCR. Also, we explored the impacts of different DNA polymerase enzymes on the results based on gel electrophoresis and hybridization. The PCR results by gel electrophoresis in the single-step PCR depended on which DNA polymerase was used. All samples were negative with AmpliTaq Gold DNA polymerase, and 54.5% (36 of 66) were positive with the conventional Taq DNA polymerase. All samples were negative after hybridization with a C. pneumoniae-specific probe. In the nested PCR, all specimens were negative by gel electrophoresis and after hybridization. The RLB assay failed to detect C. pneumoniae in any specimen; however, 20 specimens were Chlamydia sp. positive. The sequence analysis of six of these samples demonstrated Chlamydia-like organisms. RLB detected Chlamydia sp. DNA in water and in the elution buffer after passage of the Qiagen columns (11 of 40). This study identified factors that may influence the detection of C. pneumoniae DNA in vascular tissues and consequently bias the perception of a link between C. pneumoniae and vascular diseases. The following are strongly recommended: to use DNA polymerases that have to be activated, to decontaminate with dUTP-uracil-DNA glycosylase, to hybridize with specific probes, to include sufficient controls, and to use molecular grade water.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Regional Laboratory Medical Microbiology, P.O. Box 899, 3300 AW, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. Phone: 31-78-652 31 61. Fax: 31-78-652 31 20. E-mail: b.maraha{at}asz.nl.


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, September 2004, p. 3937-3941, Vol. 42, No. 9
0095-1137/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.9.3937-3941.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2004 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.