This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lemaître, N.
Right arrow Articles by Courcol, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lemaître, N.
Right arrow Articles by Courcol, R. J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, September 2004, p. 4307-4309, Vol. 42, No. 9
0095-1137/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.9.4307-4309.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Comparison of the Real-Time PCR Method and the Gen-Probe Amplified Mycobacterium tuberculosis Direct Test for Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Pulmonary and Nonpulmonary Specimens

Nadine Lemaître,1* Sylvie Armand,1 Anne Vachée,2 Odile Capilliez,1 Christine Dumoulin,1 and René J. Courcol1

Laboratoire de Bactériologie-Hygiène, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Lille, Lille,1 Laboratoire de Biologie Polyvalente, Hôpital de Roubaix, Roubaix, France2

Received 24 February 2004/ Returned for modification 18 March 2004/ Accepted 4 May 2004

Real-time PCR was compared to Amplified Mycobacterium tuberculosis Direct Test (AMTDII) for 100 clinical specimens. The overall sensitivities of the real-time PCR method and AMTDII were similar for respiratory and nonrespiratory specimens. However, real-time PCR seemed to be less susceptible to amplification inhibitors than AMTDII.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Laboratoire de Bactériologie-Hygiène, Hôpital A. Calmette, CHRU de Lille, Bvd. du Professeur Jules Leclercq, 59037 Lille Cedex, France. Phone: (33) 3 20 44 45 92. Fax: (33) 3 20 44 48 95. E-mail: n-lemaitre{at}chru-lille.fr.


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, September 2004, p. 4307-4309, Vol. 42, No. 9
0095-1137/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.9.4307-4309.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Campos, M., Quartin, A., Mendes, E., Abreu, A., Gurevich, S., Echarte, L., Ferreira, T., Cleary, T., Hollender, E., Ashkin, D. (2008). Feasibility of Shortening Respiratory Isolation with a Single Sputum Nucleic Acid Amplification Test. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 178: 300-305 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Greco, S, Girardi, E, Navarra, A, Saltini, C (2006). Current evidence on diagnostic accuracy of commercially based nucleic acid amplification tests for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis. Thorax 61: 783-790 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Espy, M. J., Uhl, J. R., Sloan, L. M., Buckwalter, S. P., Jones, M. F., Vetter, E. A., Yao, J. D. C., Wengenack, N. L., Rosenblatt, J. E., Cockerill, F. R. III, Smith, T. F. (2006). Real-Time PCR in Clinical Microbiology: Applications for Routine Laboratory Testing. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 19: 165-256 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Burggraf, S., Reischl, U., Malik, N., Bollwein, M., Naumann, L., Olgemoller, B. (2005). Comparison of an Internally Controlled, Large-Volume LightCycler Assay for Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Clinical Samples with the COBAS AMPLICOR Assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 1564-1569 [Abstract] [Full Text]