JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Risatti, G.
Right arrow Articles by Borca, M. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Risatti, G.
Right arrow Articles by Borca, M. V.
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, January 2005, p. 468-471, Vol. 43, No. 1
0095-1137/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.43.1.468-471.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Diagnostic Evaluation of a Real-Time Reverse Transcriptase PCR Assay for Detection of Classical Swine Fever Virus

G. Risatti,1 L. Holinka,1 Z. Lu,1 G. Kutish,1 J. D. Callahan,2 W. M. Nelson,2 E. Brea Tió,3 and M. V. Borca1*

Plum Island Animal Disease Center, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Greenport, New York,1 Tetracore Inc., Gaithersburg, Maryland,2 Laboratorio Veterinario Central "LAVECEN", Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic3

Received 27 February 2004/ Returned for modification 31 May 2004/ Accepted 6 September 2004

A fluorogenic-probe hydrolysis (TaqMan)-reverse transcriptase (RT) PCR for classical swine fever virus (CSFV) was evaluated for diagnostic sensitivity and specificity by using clinical samples obtained from the Dominican Republic, where the disease is enzootic. The sensitivity of this test, using nasal swab samples taken from both symptomatic and asymptomatic animals, exceeded the diagnostic sensitivity of virus isolation (100% versus 72.4%, respectively) with little loss of specificity (98.9% versus 100%, respectively). At the herd level, three of four infected farms were identified by virus isolation, while the CSFV real-time RT-PCR assay identified all four infected premises. This simple and accurate test permits rapid detection of CSFV in affected herds.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Plum Island Animal Disease Center, USDA/ARS/NAA, P.O. Box 848, Greenport, NY 11944-0848. Phone: (631) 323-3131. Fax: (631) 323-3044. E-mail: mborca{at}piadc.ars.usda.gov.


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, January 2005, p. 468-471, Vol. 43, No. 1
0095-1137/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.43.1.468-471.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2005 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.