Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, October 2005, p. 5397-5399, Vol. 43, No. 10
0095-1137/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JCM.43.10.5397-5399.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
| CASE REPORT |
Division of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, The Western Australian Centre for Pathology and Medical Research (PathCentre), Hospital Avenue, Nedlands, Western Australia 6009,1 Infectious Diseases Department, Fremantle Hospital, Alma Street, Fremantle, Western Australia 6160, Australia2
Received 28 February 2005/ Returned for modification 13 April 2005/ Accepted 26 July 2005
Fourth-generation human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) screening immunoassays reduce the diagnostic window between infection and diagnosis by the inclusion of HIV p24 antigen detection together with HIV antibody detection in the same test. We compared third- and fourth-generation HIV immunoassays and a dedicated HIV p24 antigen test for detection of a case of HIV seroconversion. This demonstrated a second diagnostic window using the fourth-generation assay due to a decline of HIV p24 antigen prior to the detection of HIV antibody. However, HIV p24 antigen was detected in the same sample by the dedicated HIV p24 antigen test, as was HIV proviral DNA. Although it is likely to be rare, this phenomenon has also been reported for other fourth-generation HIV immunoassays and has implications for the reported diagnostic windows of these assays.
This article has been cited by other articles:
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»