Journal of Clinical Microbiology, November 2005, p. 5536-5540, Vol. 43, No. 11
0095-1137/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JCM.43.11.5536-5540.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Multicenter Evaluation of BBL CHROMagar MRSA Medium for Direct Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus from Surveillance Cultures of the Anterior Nares
Diane Flayhart,1*
Janet F. Hindler,2
David A. Bruckner,2
Geraldine Hall,3
Rabin K. Shrestha,3
Sherilynn A. Vogel,3
Sandra S. Richter,4
Wanita Howard,4
Rhonda Walther,1 and
Karen C. Carroll1
Division of Medical Microbiology, Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland,1
Microbiology Laboratory, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California,2
Microbiology Laboratory, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio,3
Department of Pathology, University of Iowa Health Care, Iowa City, Iowa4
Received 13 June 2005/
Returned for modification 13 July 2005/
Accepted 17 August 2005
Active surveillance for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is among the strategies recommended by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America for control of nosocomial MRSA infections. Infection control and laboratory personnel desire rapid, sensitive, and inexpensive methods to enhance surveillance activities. A multicenter study was performed to evaluate a new selective and differential chromogenic medium, BBL CHROMagar MRSA (C-MRSA) medium (BD Diagnostics, Sparks, MD), which enables recovery and concomitant identification of MRSA strains directly from nasal swab specimens taken from the anterior nares. Specimens were inoculated to C-MRSA and Trypticase soy agar with 5% sheep blood agar (TSA II, BD Diagnostics). Mauve colonies on C-MRSA at 24 h and 48 h and suspicious colonies on TSA II were confirmed as Staphylococcus aureus by Gram stain morphology and a coagulase test. In addition, the results of C-MRSA were compared to results of susceptibility testing (five different methods) of S. aureus strains isolated on TSA II. A total of 2,015 specimens were inoculated to C-MRSA and TSA II. Three hundred fifty-four S. aureus isolates were recovered; 208 (59%) were oxacillin (methicillin) susceptible and 146 (41%) were oxacillin resistant (MRSA). On C-MRSA, 139/146 or 95.2% of MRSA isolates were recovered, whereas recovery on TSA II was 86.9% (127/146) (P = 0.0027). The overall specificity of C-MRSA was 99.7%. When C-MRSA was compared to each susceptibility testing method, the sensitivity and specificity, respectively, were as follows: oxacillin MIC by broth microdilution, 94.4% and 96.7%; oxacillin screen agar, 94.3% and 96.7%; PBP2' latex agglutination, 93.7% and 98.5%; cefoxitin disk diffusion, 95.0% and 98.1%; and mecA PCR, 95.1% and 98.1%. In this study, C-MRSA was superior to TSA II for recovery of MRSA from surveillance specimens obtained from the anterior nares and was comparable to conventional, rapid, and molecular susceptibility methods for the identification of MRSA isolates.
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Division of Medical Microbiology, Meyer B1-193, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 N. Wolfe St., Baltimore, MD 21287. Phone: (410) 955-5077. Fax: (410) 614-8087. E-mail: dflayha{at}jhmi.edu.
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, November 2005, p. 5536-5540, Vol. 43, No. 11
0095-1137/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JCM.43.11.5536-5540.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Lagace-Wiens, P. R. S., Alfa, M. J., Manickam, K., Harding, G. K. M.
(2008). Reductions in Workload and Reporting Time by Use of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Screening with MRSASelect Medium Compared to Mannitol-Salt Medium Supplemented with Oxacillin. J. Clin. Microbiol.
46: 1174-1177
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Boyce, J. M., Havill, N. L.
(2008). Comparison of BD GeneOhm Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) PCR versus the CHROMagar MRSA Assay for Screening Patients for the Presence of MRSA Strains. J. Clin. Microbiol.
46: 350-351
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ellis, M. W., Griffith, M. E., Dooley, D. P., McLean, J. C., Jorgensen, J. H., Patterson, J. E., Davis, K. A., Hawley, J. S., Regules, J. A., Rivard, R. G., Gray, P. J., Ceremuga, J. M., DeJoseph, M. A., Hospenthal, D. R.
(2007). Targeted Intranasal Mupirocin To Prevent Colonization and Infection by Community-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Strains in Soldiers: a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
51: 3591-3598
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Cherkaoui, A., Renzi, G., Francois, P., Schrenzel, J.
(2007). Comparison of four chromogenic media for culture-based screening of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Med Microbiol
56: 500-503
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Han, Z., Lautenbach, E., Fishman, N., Nachamkin, I.
(2007). Evaluation of mannitol salt agar, CHROMagar Staph aureus and CHROMagar MRSA for detection of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from nasal swab specimens. J Med Microbiol
56: 43-46
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Louie, L., Soares, D., Meaney, H., Vearncombe, M., Simor, A. E.
(2006). Evaluation of a New Chromogenic Medium, MRSA Select, for Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol.
44: 4561-4563
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Pape, J., Wadlin, J., Nachamkin, I.
(2006). Use of BBL CHROMagar MRSA Medium for Identification of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Directly from Blood Cultures.. J. Clin. Microbiol.
44: 2575-2576
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.