JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ben-Ami, R.
Right arrow Articles by Carmeli, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ben-Ami, R.
Right arrow Articles by Carmeli, Y.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, March 2005, p. 1448-1450, Vol. 43, No. 3
0095-1137/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.43.3.1448-1450.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Erroneous Reporting of Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci as Kocuria spp. by the Vitek 2 System

R. Ben-Ami,1 S. Navon-Venezia,2 D. Schwartz,3 Y. Schlezinger,2 Y. Mekuzas,2 and Y. Carmeli1,2,4*

Infectious Diseases Unit,1 Laboratories of Molecular Epidemiology,2 Microbiology,3 Department of Epidemiology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel4

Received 19 February 2004/ Returned for modification 4 June 2004/ Accepted 18 October 2004

Misidentification of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) may delay appropriate treatment. We investigated 20 clinical isolates identified as Kocuria spp. by the Vitek 2 system. All were identified as CoNS by 16S rRNA gene sequencing (18 Staphylococcus epidermidis, 1 Staphylococcus haemolyticus). Four Kocuria isolates were shown to be identical to CoNS from the same patient by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Isolates identified by Vitek 2 as Kocuria most likely represent misidentified CoNS, and if clinically indicated, should be investigated further by genomic methods.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Infectious Diseases Unit, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel-Aviv 64239, Israel. Phone and fax: 972-3-697-4996. E-mail: ycarmeli{at}bidmc.harvard.edu.


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, March 2005, p. 1448-1450, Vol. 43, No. 3
0095-1137/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.43.3.1448-1450.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2005 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.