This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by McGregor, K. F. Articles by Spratt, B. G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by McGregor, K. F. Articles by Spratt, B. G.

Identity and Prevalence of Multilocus Sequence Typing-Defined Clones of Group A Streptococci within a Hospital Setting

Karen F. McGregor and Brian G. Spratt^*

Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, St. Mary's Hospital, London, United Kingdom

Received 18 October 2004/ Returned for modification 19 November 2004/ Accepted 30 November 2004

Between July and October 2003, 121 clinical isolates of group A streptococci (GAS) were collected from a London hospital and characterized by multilocus sequence typing (MLST) to determine the identity and prevalence of clones circulating within this setting. A total of 39 sequence types (ST), of which 20 were represented by a single isolate, were identified. The eight most prevalent clones among the 121 GAS were ST117/emm81 (16%), ST39/emm4 (9%), ST62/emm87 (7%), ST28/emm1 (6%), ST36/emm12 (6%), ST46/emm22 (5%), ST334/emm82 (5%), and ST101/emm89 (4%). Compared to those in the MLST database (http://spyogenes.mlst.net), 12 (31%) of the 39 STs had not been previously identified, although 7 of these differed from recognized STs at only a single locus, suggesting they were closely related to previously recognized strains. Resistance to erythromycin and tetracycline was seen in 7 and 20% of isolates, respectively, with four isolates resistant to both agents. GAS strains with higher (>80) emm types accounted for 45% of GAS isolates collected during this study. Continuing GAS surveillance, using easily comparable methods, is important for detecting changes in the character of disease-causing isolates.

Present address: Microbiology Research Group, Thames Valley University, London W5 5AA, United Kingdom.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Robinson, D. A., Sutcliffe, J. A., Tewodros, W., Manoharan, A., Bessen, D. E. (2006). Evolution and global dissemination of macrolide-resistant group a streptococci.. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50: 2903-2911 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Littauer, P., Caugant, D. A., Sangvik, M., Hoiby, E. A., Sundsfjord, A., Simonsen, G. S., the Norwegian Macrolide Study Group, (2006). Macrolide-Resistant Streptococcus pyogenes in Norway: Population Structure and Resistance Determinants.. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50: 1896-1899 [Abstract] [Full Text]