Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, October 2006, p. 3804-3807, Vol. 44, No. 10
0095-1137/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JCM.00395-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Natalia Malachowa,2,
Jacek Miedzobrodzki,2 and
Waleria Hryniewicz1*
National Institute of Public Health, 00-725 Warsaw, Poland,1 Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University, 30-387 Cracow, Poland2
Received 22 February 2006/ Returned for modification 26 May 2006/ Accepted 7 July 2006
In this study, we compared the potentials of (i) a multiplex PCR-based multilocus variable-number tandem repeat (VNTR) assay; (ii) a triplex PCR coamplifying fragments of spa, coa, and the hypervariable region adjacent to the mecA gene; (iii) restriction profile analysis of the STAR repetitive element; (iv) randomly amplified polymorphic DNA analysis; (v) inter-IS256 PCR; and (vi) rep-MP3 PCR. Multilocus VNTR typing and triplex PCR (coa, spa, and hypervariable region) approaches showed excellent reproducibility and high discriminatory power; however, only multilocus VNTR typing could distinguish all pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and spa types. Multilocus VNTR typing appears to be the most useful PCR-based method for the rapid genotyping of Staphylococcus aureus strains.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
This article has been cited by other articles:
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»