This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Other Versions of this Article: JCM.01215-06v1 44/12/4425    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Archibald, L. K. Articles by Reller, L. B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Archibald, L. K. Articles by Reller, L. B.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, December 2006, p. 4425-4429, Vol. 44, No. 12
0095-1137/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.01215-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Blood Culture Contamination in Tanzania, Malawi, and the United States: a Microbiological Tale of Three Cities

Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina,¹ Muhimbili University College of Health Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania,² Lilongwe Central Hospital, Lilongwe, Malawi³

Received 14 June 2006/ Returned for modification 27 July 2006/ Accepted 22 September 2006

We conducted retrospective, comparative analyses of contamination rates for cultures of blood obtained in the emergency rooms of Muhimbili National Hospital (MNH) in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania; Lilongwe Central Hospital (LCH) in central Malawi; and the Duke University Medical Center (DUMC) in the United States. None of the emergency room patients had indwelling intravascular devices at the time that the blood samples for cultures were obtained. In addition, we reviewed the contamination rates for a cohort of patients already hospitalized in the DUMC inpatient medical service, most of whom had indwelling intravascular devices. The bloodstream infection rates among the patients at MNH (n = 513) and LCH (n = 486) were similar (28%); the contamination rates at the two hospitals were 1.3% (7/513) and 0.8% (4/486), respectively. Of 54 microorganisms isolated from cultures of blood collected in the DUMC emergency room, 26 (48%) were identified as skin contaminants. Cultures of blood collected in the DUMC emergency room were significantly more likely to yield growth of contaminants than the cultures of blood collected in the emergency rooms at MNH and LCH combined (26/332 versus 11/1,003; P < 0.0001) or collected in the DUMC inpatient medical service (26/332 versus 7/283; P < 0.01). For the MNH and LCH blood cultures, lower contamination rates were observed when skin was disinfected with isopropyl alcohol plus tincture of iodine rather than isopropyl alcohol plus povidone-iodine. In conclusion, blood culture contamination was minimized in sub-Saharan African hospitals with substantially limited resources through scrupulous attention to aseptic skin cleansing and improved venipuncture techniques. Application of these principles when blood samples for culture are obtained in U.S. hospital emergency rooms should help mitigate blood culture contamination rates and the unnecessary microbiology workup of skin contaminants.

Published ahead of print on 4 October 2006.