JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gilpin, B.
Right arrow Articles by Henderson, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gilpin, B.
Right arrow Articles by Henderson, T.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, February 2006, p. 406-412, Vol. 44, No. 2
0095-1137/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.44.2.406-412.2006
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Application of Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis To Identify Potential Outbreaks of Campylobacteriosis in New Zealand

Brent Gilpin,1* Angela Cornelius,1 Beth Robson,1 Naomi Boxall,2 Alan Ferguson,1 Carolyn Nicol,2 and Tom Henderson3

ESR Ltd., Christchurch Science Centre, Christchurch, New Zealand,1 ESR Ltd., Kenepuru Science Centre, Porirua, New Zealand,2 Medlab South Ltd., Christchurch, New Zealand3

Received 22 September 2005/ Returned for modification 17 November 2005/ Accepted 29 November 2005

Since 2002, New Zealand's incidence of campylobacteriosis has exceeded 300 cases per 100,000 people per annum. To evaluate genetic variation in human isolates, 183 Campylobacter isolates were collected from a single clinical laboratory in Christchurch: 77 during an 8-week period in spring, and the rest 3 months later over a second 8-week period in autumn. Isolates were identified to the species level and subtyped using Penner serotyping (Campylobacter jejuni only) and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) using both SmaI and KpnI. Approximately two-thirds of the isolates could be grouped into clusters of between 2 and 26 isolates with indistinguishable SmaI and KpnI patterns. Less than 10% of the isolates were of the same type between the two sampling periods. The epidemiological relevance of the PFGE clusters was supported by temporal clustering, some spatial clustering, and some statistically significant demographic similarities among cases in a cluster. Conversely, patient cases yielding isolates which did not cluster with isolates from other cases were more likely to report recent overseas travel and less likely to live within larger urban centers. To identify whether these clusters actually represent common-source outbreaks, however, would require the detailed, rapid, and reiterative epidemiological investigation of cases within a PFGE cluster. The combined and timely application of subtyping and epidemiological investigation would appear to be a promising strategy for understanding campylobacteriosis in New Zealand.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Institute of Environmental Science & Research Limited, Christchurch Science Centre, P.O. Box 29-181, Christchurch, New Zealand. Phone: 64-3-351 6019. Fax: 64-3-351 0010. E-mail: brent.gilpin{at}esr.cri.nz.


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, February 2006, p. 406-412, Vol. 44, No. 2
0095-1137/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.44.2.406-412.2006
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2006 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.