JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McDonald, M.
Right arrow Articles by Carapetis, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McDonald, M.
Right arrow Articles by Carapetis, J.
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, February 2006, p. 547-552, Vol. 44, No. 2
0095-1137/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.44.2.547-552.2006
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Recovering Streptococci from the Throat, a Practical Alternative to Direct Plating in Remote Tropical Communities

Malcolm McDonald,1* Rebecca Towers,1 Peter Fagan,1 Melita McKinnon,1 Norma Benger,1 Ross Andrews,2 Bart J. Currie,1 and Jonathan Carapetis2

Tropical and Emerging Infectious Diseases Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia,1 Centre for International Child Health, University of Melbourne Department of Paediatrics, Royal Children's Hospital, and Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia2

Received 6 October 2005/ Returned for modification 31 October 2005/ Accepted 11 November 2005

Throat swabs are regarded as the "gold standard" for diagnosing streptococcal pharyngitis and for surveillance research. Culturing throats in remote tropical settings is logistically difficult, and these settings are commonly burdened by high rates of streptococcal disease. The survival of streptococci on swabs may depend on whether they are of "throat" or "skin" type, as determined by emm pattern typing. The aims of this study were to compare the recovery rates of beta-hemolytic streptococci (BHS) using three different transport methods and to determine whether the recovery rates correlated with the emm pattern type. Monthly duplicate throat swabs were taken from occupants of selected households in three remote Aboriginal communities. Paired swabs were separated and handled in one of three ways: (i) direct inoculation onto culture media with cold-box transport (plated), (ii) sealed in a bag with a silica gel desiccant and cold-box transport (desiccant), and (iii) transport at ambient temperature and humidity (ambient). emm pattern typing was done by standard methods. Over 23 months, 4,842 throat swabs were taken, and 4,122 were paired. BHS were recovered on 11.5% of the 4,842 occasions (group A, 4.5%; group C, 1.7%; group G, 5.4%). Results from paired swabs showed the plated method was superior to desiccant and desiccant was better than ambient. Pooled data indicated that plated and desiccant were equivalent, and both were significantly better than ambient. There was no correlation between the emm pattern type and recovery of group A streptococci by different methods. In tropical and remote settings, cold-box transport with desiccant and subsequent inoculation of culture plates in the laboratory is a practical alternative to direct plating.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Menzies School of Health Research, P.O. Box 41096, Casuarina, 0811, NT, Australia. Phone: 08-89228197. Fax: 08-89227876. E-mail: malcolm{at}menzies.edu.au.


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, February 2006, p. 547-552, Vol. 44, No. 2
0095-1137/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.44.2.547-552.2006
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2006 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.