This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krüüner, A.
Right arrow Articles by Drobniewski, F. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Krüüner, A.
Right arrow Articles by Drobniewski, F. A.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, March 2006, p. 811-818, Vol. 44, No. 3
0095-1137/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.44.3.811-818.2006
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Evaluation of MGIT 960-Based Antimicrobial Testing and Determination of Critical Concentrations of First- and Second-Line Antimicrobial Drugs with Drug-Resistant Clinical Strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Annika Krüüner,1,2 Malcolm D. Yates,1 and Francis A. Drobniewski1*

Health Protection Agency, Mycobacterium Reference Unit, Clinical Research Centre, Barts and the London School of Medicine, Queen Mary College, University of London, 2 Newark Street, London, United Kingdom E1 2AT,1 Tartu University Clinics, United Laboratory, Department of Mycobacteriology, Tartu, Estonia2

Received 28 April 2005/ Returned for modification 8 July 2005/ Accepted 31 October 2005

The objectives of this study were to (i) compare agreement of the MGIT 960 system for first-line drugs with a methodology (the resistance ratio method [RRM]) that had been used in clinical trials, relating drug susceptibility to clinical outcome; (ii) compare the performance of the MGIT 960, RRM, and microtiter plate assay (MPA) methodologies for second-line drug testing; and (iii) define critical concentrations for ciprofloxacin and moxifloxacin for liquid-culture-based testing. The large collection of clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (n = 247) used included 176 (71%) multidrug-resistant isolates. The results for MGIT 960 and the RRM for rifampin and isoniazid (n = 200) were in excellent (99 to 100%) agreement for all strains. For streptomycin, 97% of the results at the critical concentration and 92% at high concentration, and for pyrazinamide 92% of results overall, were concordant, but for ethambutol, fewer than 85% (65% for the critical concentration and 84% for the high concentration) of the MGIT-based results were concordant with those for the RRM. The MGIT 960, RRM, and MPA assays (n = 133) correlated well for most second-line drugs tested. For susceptibility to ofloxacin, the MGIT 960 and MPA results were in full agreement. The amikacin and rifabutin results obtained by MGIT 960 agreed with the RRM results in 131 (99%) cases, and for capreomycin, they agreed for 129 of 133 isolates tested (97%). For prothionamide testing, only a limited number of drug-resistant isolates were available for testing and drawing definitive conclusions. We propose critical concentrations of 1.0 µg/ml and 0.125 µg/ml for ciprofloxacin and moxifloxacin, respectively, for liquid-culture-based testing.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Health Protection Agency, Mycobacterium Reference Unit, Clinical Research Centre, Barts and the London School of Medicine, Queen Mary College, University of London, 2 Newark Street, London, United Kingdom E1 2AT. Phone: 2073775895. Fax: 2075393459. E-mail: f.drobniewski{at}qmul.ac.uk.


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, March 2006, p. 811-818, Vol. 44, No. 3
0095-1137/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.44.3.811-818.2006
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Lin, S.-Y. G., Desmond, E., Bonato, D., Gross, W., Siddiqi, S. (2009). Multicenter Evaluation of Bactec MGIT 960 System for Second-Line Drug Susceptibility Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47: 3630-3634 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Springer, B., Lucke, K., Calligaris-Maibach, R., Ritter, C., Bottger, E. C. (2009). Quantitative Drug Susceptibility Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by Use of MGIT 960 and EpiCenter Instrumentation. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47: 1773-1780 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Devasia, R. A., Blackman, A., May, C., Eden, S., Smith, T., Hooper, N., Maruri, F., Stratton, C., Shintani, A., Sterling, T. R. (2009). Fluoroquinolone resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: an assessment of MGIT 960, MODS and nitrate reductase assay and fluoroquinolone cross-resistance. J Antimicrob Chemother 63: 1173-1178 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Ritz, N., Tebruegge, M., Connell, T. G., Sievers, A., Robins-Browne, R., Curtis, N. (2009). Susceptibility of Mycobacterium bovis BCG Vaccine Strains to Antituberculous Antibiotics. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53: 316-318 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Martin, A., von Groll, A., Fissette, K., Palomino, J. C., Varaine, F., Portaels, F. (2008). Rapid Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Resistance to Second-Line Drugs by Use of the Manual Mycobacterium Growth Indicator Tube System. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46: 3952-3956 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Jureen, P., Werngren, J., Toro, J.-C., Hoffner, S. (2008). Pyrazinamide Resistance and pncA Gene Mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52: 1852-1854 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Shin, S. J., Collins, M. T. (2008). Thiopurine Drugs Azathioprine and 6-Mercaptopurine Inhibit Mycobacterium paratuberculosis Growth In Vitro. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52: 418-426 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Garrigo, M., Aragon, L. M., Alcaide, F., Borrell, S., Cardenosa, E., Galan, J. J., Gonzalez-Martin, J., Martin-Casabona, N., Moreno, C., Salvado, M., Coll, P. (2007). Multicenter Laboratory Evaluation of the MB/BacT Mycobacterium Detection System and the BACTEC MGIT 960 System in Comparison with the BACTEC 460TB System for Susceptibility Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45: 1766-1770 [Abstract] [Full Text]