JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pinho, M. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pinho, M. D.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, March 2006, p. 841-846, Vol. 44, No. 3
0095-1137/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.44.3.841-846.2006
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Clonal Relationships between Invasive and Noninvasive Lancefield Group C and G Streptococci and emm-Specific Differences in Invasiveness

M. D. Pinho, J. Melo-Cristino, M. Ramirez,* and the Portuguese Group for the Study of Streptococcal Infections

Instituto de Microbiologia, Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal

Received 10 August 2005/ Returned for modification 26 October 2005/ Accepted 13 December 2005

Lancefield group G and group C streptococci (GGS and GCS, respectively) are pathogens responsible for a number of life-threatening infections. A collection of 116 recent (1998 to 2004) invasive (n = 28) and noninvasive (n = 88) GGS and GCS clinical isolates from Portugal were characterized. All isolates were identified as Streptococcus dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis and characterized by emm typing and DNA macrorestriction profiling using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). emm typing revealed the presence of 22 distinct types, including 3 novel types. PFGE identified 14 clones with more than two isolates, but over half of the isolates were concentrated in 3 large clones. Individual clones and emm types showed a low level of association, since the majority of the clones included more than one emm type and the same emm type was found among diverse genetic backgrounds. Two emm types, stg2078 and stg10, were significantly more frequent among invasive isolates, and another two, stg6792 and stg166b, were present only in noninvasive isolates, suggesting a correlation between emm type and invasive disease potential.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Instituto de Microbiologia, Faculdade Medicina Lisboa, Av. Prof. Egas Moniz, PT 1649-028 Lisbon, Portugal. Phone: 351-21 799 9460. Fax: 351-21 799 9459. E-mail: ramirez{at}fm.ul.pt.


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, March 2006, p. 841-846, Vol. 44, No. 3
0095-1137/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.44.3.841-846.2006
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2006 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.