JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bensoussan, E.
Right arrow Articles by Jaffe, C. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bensoussan, E.
Right arrow Articles by Jaffe, C. L.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2006, p. 1435-1439, Vol. 44, No. 4
0095-1137/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.44.4.1435-1439.2006
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Comparison of PCR Assays for Diagnosis of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis

Esther Bensoussan,1 Abedelmajeed Nasereddin,1 Flory Jonas,2 Lionel F. Schnur,1 and Charles L. Jaffe1*

Department of Parasitology, Kuvin Centre for the Study of Infectious and Tropical Diseases,1 Department of Dermatology, Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem, Israel2

Received 19 October 2005/ Returned for modification 12 December 2005/ Accepted 6 February 2006

Three PCR assays for diagnosing leishmaniasis were compared and validated against parasite cultures and microscopic evaluation of stained tissue smears using 92 specimens from suspected cases of cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) in Israel and the West Bank. Samples from imported and locally acquired disease were examined. The kinetoplast DNA (kDNA) PCR showed the highest sensitivity (98.7%) of any assay, correctly diagnosing 77/78 of the confirmed positive samples, followed by the rRNA gene internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) PCR (71/78 positive, 91.0% sensitivity) and then the spliced leader mini-exon PCR (42/78 positive, 53.8% sensitivity). Either parasite culture or microscopy alone detected 62.8% (49/78) or 74.4% (58/78) of the positive specimens, respectively, while culture and microscopy together improved overall sensitivity to 83.3% (65/78). Except for the kDNA PCR that had six false positives, all other assays were 100% specific. Further, restriction enzyme analysis of the ITS1 PCR product enabled identification of 74.6% of the positive samples, which included strains of Leishmania major (50.9%), Leishmania tropica (47.2%), and the Leishmania braziliensis complex (1.9%). This suggests that a PCR using kDNA should be used for the diagnosis of CL and that an ITS1 PCR can be reliably used for the diagnosis of CL when rapid species identification is needed.

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Parasitology, P.O. Box 12272, Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem 91120, Israel. Phone: 972-2-6757435. Fax: 972-2-6757425. E-mail: cjaffe{at}cc.huji.ac.il.

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2006, p. 1435-1439, Vol. 44, No. 4
0095-1137/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.44.4.1435-1439.2006
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:



Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2006 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.