This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Schachter, J. Articles by Moncada, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Schachter, J. Articles by Moncada, J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, July 2006, p. 2512-2517, Vol. 44, No. 7
0095-1137/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.02620-05
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by Nucleic Acid Amplification Testing: Our Evaluation Suggests that CDC-Recommended Approaches for Confirmatory Testing Are Ill-Advised

Chlamydia Research Laboratory, Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California,¹ Sexually Transmitted Disease Control Branch, California Department of Health Services, Richmond, California²

Received 16 December 2005/ Returned for modification 6 February 2006/ Accepted 6 May 2006

We evaluated three CDC-suggested approaches for confirming positive nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) for Chlamydia trachomatis: (i) repeat the original test on the original specimen, (ii) retest the original specimen with a different test, and (iii) perform a different test on a duplicate specimen. For approach 1, specimens (genital swabs or first-catch urine [FCU]) initially positive by the Abbott LCx Probe System Chlamydia trachomatis Assay (LCx; Abbott Laboratories), the APTIMA Combo 2 Assay (AC2; Gen-Probe Inc.), the Amplicor CT/NG Assay (PCR; Roche Diagnostics Corp.), or the BD ProbeTec ET System C. trachomatis amplified-DNA assay (SDA; Becton Dickinson Diagnostic Systems) were retested by the same NAAT. In several evaluations, multiple efforts were made to confirm the original positive result. For approach 2, specimens initially positive by SDA and the Hybrid Capture 2 CT-ID DNA Test (HC2; Digene Corp.) were retested by different NAATs (SDA, PCR, AC2, and the APTIMA assay for C. trachomatis [ACT]). For approach 3, duplicate male urethral or cervical swabs were tested by SDA or by both AC2 and ACT. FCU specimens were tested by all three tests. We found that 84 to 98% of SDA, LCx, PCR, and AC2 positive results were confirmed by a repeat test and that 89 to 99% of SDA and AC2 and 93% of HC2 positive results were confirmed by different NAATs, but that some NAATs cannot be used to confirm other NAATs. The use of repeat testing did not confirm 11% of C. trachomatis SDA positive results that could be confirmed by more extensive testing. Doing more testing confirms more positive results; >90% of all positive NAATs could be confirmed.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Moncada, J., Donegan, E., Schachter, J. (2008). Evaluation of CDC-Recommended Approaches for Confirmatory Testing of Positive Neisseria gonorrhoeae Nucleic Acid Amplification Test Results. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46: 1614-1619 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Rogers, S M, Miller, W C, Turner, C F, Ellen, J, Zenilman, J, Rothman, R, Villarroel, M A, Al-Tayyib, A, Leone, P, Gaydos, C, Ganapathi, L, Hobbs, M, Kanouse, D (2008). Concordance of chlamydia trachomatis infections within sexual partnerships. Sex. Transm. Infect. 84: 23-28 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Munson, E., Boyd, V., Czarnecka, J., Griep, J., Lund, B., Schaal, N., Hryciuk, J. E. (2007). Evaluation of Gen-Probe APTIMA-Based Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis Confirmatory Testing in a Metropolitan Setting of High Disease Prevalence. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45: 2793-2797 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Alexander, S., Martin, I., Ison, C. (2007). Confirming the Chlamydia trachomatis status of referred rectal specimens. Sex. Transm. Infect. 83: 327-329 [Abstract] [Full Text]