JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jeyanathan, M.
Right arrow Articles by Behr, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jeyanathan, M.
Right arrow Articles by Behr, M. A.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, August 2006, p. 2942-2950, Vol. 44, No. 8
0095-1137/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.00585-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Evaluation of In Situ Methods Used To Detect Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in Samples from Patients with Crohn's Disease

Mangalakumari Jeyanathan,1 David C. Alexander,1 Christine Y. Turenne,1 Christiane Girard,2 and Marcel A. Behr1*

McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada,1 Université de Montréal, Faculté de Médecine Veterinaire, Ste.-Hyacinthe, Québec, Canada2

Received 20 March 2006/ Returned for modification 10 May 2006/ Accepted 5 June 2006

In common with other diagnostic tests, detection of mycobacteria in tissue by microscopic examination is susceptible to spectrum bias. Since Crohn's disease is defined by the absence of detectable pathogenic organisms, the use of in situ techniques to search for Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in Crohn's disease samples requires validation of methods in a paucibacillary setting. To generate paucibacillary infection, C57BL/6 mice were artificially infected with Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis strain K10 and M. tuberculosis H37Rv, yielding tissues harboring fewer than one bacillus per oil immersion field. Serial sections of organs were then studied by cell wall-based staining techniques (Ziehl-Neelsen and auramine rhodamine) and nucleic acid-based staining techniques (in situ hybridization [ISH] and indirect in situ PCR [IS PCR]). Microscopic examination and measurement of morphometric parameters of bacilli revealed that for all methods, Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis bacilli were observed to be shorter, smaller, and less rod shaped than M. tuberculosis bacilli. Ziehl-Neelsen, auramine rhodamine stains, ISH targeting rRNA, and IS-PCR targeting the IS900 element afforded comparable sensitivities, but for all methods, visualization of individual bacterial forms required magnification x1,000. Auramine rhodamine staining and IS-PCR generated positive signals in negative controls, indicating the nonspecificity of these assays. Together, our results indicate that detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis bacilli in tissue requires oil immersion microscopy, that rRNA-ISH provides sensitivity and specificity comparable to those of Ziehl-Neelsen staining, and that the microscopic detection limit for Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in tissue is governed more by bacterial burden than by staining method.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Division of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology, A5-156, Montreal General Hospital, 1650 Cedar Avenue, Montreal, QC H3G 1A4, Canada. Phone: (514) 934-1934, ext. 42815. Fax: (514) 934-8423. E-mail: marcel.behr{at}mcgill.ca.


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, August 2006, p. 2942-2950, Vol. 44, No. 8
0095-1137/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.00585-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2006 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.