JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wroblewski, J. K. H.
Right arrow Articles by Totten, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wroblewski, J. K. H.
Right arrow Articles by Totten, P. A.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, September 2006, p. 3306-3312, Vol. 44, No. 9
0095-1137/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.00553-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Comparison of Transcription-Mediated Amplification and PCR Assay Results for Various Genital Specimen Types for Detection of Mycoplasma genitalium

Jennifer K. H. Wroblewski,1 Lisa E. Manhart,2 Kathleen A. Dickey,3,{dagger} Marie K. Hudspeth,3 and Patricia A. Totten1*

Departments of Medicine,1 Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington,2 Gen-Probe Incorporated, San Diego, California3

Received 14 March 2006/ Returned for modification 18 May 2006/ Accepted 3 July 2006

Mycoplasma genitalium is now recognized as a possible cause of several idiopathic sexually transmitted disease (STD) syndromes. However, due to the difficulty of culture of this fastidious bacterium, nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) are necessary for its detection in patient specimens. In the current study we compared a newly developed research-only transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) assay (Gen-Probe Incorporated) to our in-house DNA-based PCR assay for detection of M. genitalium. The relative performance characteristics of these two NAATs were assessed with genital specimens from 284 women and 352 men reporting to an STD clinic in Seattle, WA. Among the women, M. genitalium was detected by the TMA and PCR assays in 36 (13%) and 39 (14%) vaginal swab specimens, respectively ({kappa} = 0.923); 26 (9%) and 23 (8%) cervical swab specimens, respectively ({kappa} = 0.843); and 25 (9%) and 28 (10%) urine specimens, respectively ({kappa} = 0.687). Among the M. genitalium-positive women, the relative sensitivities of detection for the TMA and PCR assays were 84% and 91%, respectively, for vaginal swab specimens; 60% and 53%, respectively, for cervical swab specimens; and 58% and 65%, respectively, for urine specimens. By using an infected patient (a woman positive at any site by TMA assay and at any site by PCR) as a proxy for a "gold standard," the specificities of detection were >99.5% for both the TMA and the PCR assays. Among the men, M. genitalium was detected in 24 urine specimens (6.8%) by the TMA assay, 26 (7.4%) urine specimens by PCR assay, and 32 urine specimens (9%) by either test ({kappa} = 0.791). We conclude that the M. genitalium TMA and PCR assays are highly specific and that vaginal swab specimens are the most sensitive specimen type for the detection of M. genitalium in women.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Box 359779, 325 9th Ave., Seattle, WA 98104. Phone: (206) 341-5350. Fax: (206) 341-5363. E-mail: patotten{at}u.washington.edu.

{dagger} Present address: 2046 Bruceala Ct., Cardiff, CA 92007.


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, September 2006, p. 3306-3312, Vol. 44, No. 9
0095-1137/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.00553-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2006 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.