Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, January 2007, p. 248-251, Vol. 45, No. 1
0095-1137/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JCM.01576-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Dipartimento di Igiene e Microbiologia,1 Dipartimento di Ostetricia e Ginecologia,2 Dipartimento di Biotecnologie Mediche e Medicina Legale, Università di Palermo, Palermo, Italy3
Received 31 July 2006/ Returned for modification 6 October 2006/ Accepted 25 October 2006
Methods that used specimens from three genital sites (penile brushing [PB], urethral brushing [UB], and the retrieval of semen [SE]) from 50 men were examined for human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA detection. The rates of detection by PB, UB, SE, PB and UB, and PB and SE were 88.9%, 50.0%, 33.3%, 100%, and 97.2%, respectively. The use of PB and UB appears to be the most accurate method; as an alternative to UB, the use of SE with PB could be used to improve the rate of HPV DNA detection in men.
Published ahead of print on 8 November 2006.
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»