This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Other Versions of this Article: JCM.00280-07v1 45/11/3631    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lam, W. Y. Articles by Chan, P. K. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lam, W. Y. Articles by Chan, P. K. S.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, November 2007, p. 3631-3640, Vol. 45, No. 11
0095-1137/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.00280-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Rapid Multiplex Nested PCR for Detection of Respiratory Viruses

Department of Microbiology,¹ Stanley Ho Centre for Emerging Infectious Diseases of the School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong²

Received 4 February 2007/ Returned for modification 11 May 2007/ Accepted 19 August 2007

Respiratory tract infections can be caused by a heterogeneous group of viruses and bacteria that produce similar clinical presentations. Specific diagnosis therefore relies on laboratory investigation. This study developed and evaluated five groups of multiplex nested PCR assays that could simultaneously detect 21 different respiratory pathogens: influenza A virus (H1N1, H3N2, and H5N1); influenza B virus; parainfluenza virus types 1, 2, 3, 4a, and 4b; respiratory syncytial virus A and B; human rhinoviruses; human enteroviruses; human coronaviruses OC43 and 229E; severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus; human metapneumoviruses; Mycoplasma pneumoniae; Chlamydophila pneumoniae; Legionella pneumophila; and adenoviruses (A to F). These multiplex nested PCRs adopted fast PCR technology. The high speed of fast PCR (within 35 min) greatly improved the efficiency of these assays. The results show that these multiplex nested PCR assays are specific and more sensitive (100- to 1,000-fold) than conventional methods. Among the 303 clinical specimens tested, the multiplex nested PCR achieved an overall positive rate of 48.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 42.9 to 54.1%), which was significantly higher than that of virus isolation (20.1% [95% CI, 15.6 to 24.6%]) and that of direct detection by immunofluorescence assay (13.5% [95% CI, 9.7 to 17.4%]). The improved sensitivity was partly due to the higher sensitivity of multiplex nested PCR than that of conventional methods in detecting cultivatable viruses. Moreover, the ability of the multiplex nested PCR to detect noncultivatable viruses, particularly rhinoviruses, coronavirus OC43, and metapneumoviruses, contributed a major gain (15.6%) in the overall positive rate. In conclusion, rapid multiplex nested PCR assays can improve the diagnostic yield for respiratory infections to allow prompt interventive actions to be taken.

Published ahead of print on 5 September 2007.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Sung, R. Y. T., Chan, P. K. S., Choi, K. C., Yeung, A. C. M., Li, A. M., Tang, J. W., Ip, M., Tsen, T., Nelson, E. A. S. (2008). Comparative Study of Nasopharyngeal Aspirate and Nasal Swab Specimens for Diagnosis of Acute Viral Respiratory Infection. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46: 3073-3076 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Hui, D S, Woo, J, Hui, E, Foo, A, Ip, M, To, K-W, Cheuk, E S C, Lam, W-Y, Sham, A, Chan, P K S (2008). Influenza-like illness in residential care homes: a study of the incidence, aetiological agents, natural history and health resource utilisation. Thorax 63: 690-697 [Abstract] [Full Text]