JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
JCM.01653-06v1
45/2/290    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Farrell, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Jenkins, S. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Farrell, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Jenkins, S. G.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, February 2007, p. 290-293, Vol. 45, No. 2
0095-1137/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.01653-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Prevalence and Antibacterial Susceptibility of mef(A)-Positive Macrolide-Resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae over 4 Years (2000 to 2004) of the PROTEKT US Study{triangledown}

David J. Farrell,1* Thomas M. File,2 and Stephen G. Jenkins3

G. R. Micro, Ltd., London, United Kingdom,1 Summa Health System, Akron, Ohio,2 Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York3

Received 10 August 2006/ Returned for modification 19 September 2006/ Accepted 31 October 2006

In the United States, approximately 30% of Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates are macrolide (erythromycin [ERY]) resistant (ERSP), most commonly due to expression of the mef(A) gene previously associated with lower-level ERY resistance (ERYr; MIC = 1 to 4 µg/ml). The data from the PROTEKT US surveillance study were analyzed to evaluate the prevalence and antibacterial susceptibility of mef(A)-positive ERSP. In all, 26,634 isolates of S. pneumoniae were collected in the United States between 2000 and 2004 from centers common to all years. ERYr was stable at approximately 29% over the 4 years, but the proportion of ERSP isolates positive for mef(A) alone decreased (year 1 [2000 to 2001], 69.0%; year 4 [2003 to 2004], 60.7%), with the sharpest declines seen in isolates from patients from 0 to 2 years of age. Conversely, the proportion isolates positive for both erm(B) and mef(A) increased over the duration of the present study (year 1, 9.3%; year 4, 19.1%), a change that was again most marked in patients aged ≤2 years. The majority of ERSP isolates expressing mef(A) alone exhibited higher than previously reported levels of ERYr (MIC90 = 16 µg/ml). However, the ketolide antibacterial telithromycin consistently demonstrated in vitro activity against these isolates over the 4 years of the study (MIC90 = 0.5 to 1 µg/ml).


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: G.R. Micro Ltd., 7-9 William Rd., London NW1 3ER, United Kingdom. Phone: 44 (0) 20 7388 7320. Fax: 44 (0) 20 7388 7324. E-mail: d.farrell{at}grmicro.co.uk.

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 8 November 2006.


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, February 2007, p. 290-293, Vol. 45, No. 2
0095-1137/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.01653-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2007 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.