JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
JCM.00426-07v1
45/9/3098    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Church, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Pitout, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Church, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Pitout, J. D.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, September 2007, p. 3098-3100, Vol. 45, No. 9
0095-1137/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.00426-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Evaluation of BBL CHROMagar O157 versus Sorbitol-MacConkey Medium for Routine Detection of Escherichia coli O157 in a Centralized Regional Clinical Microbiology Laboratory{triangledown}

D. L. Church,1,2* D. Emshey,1 H. Semeniuk,1 T. Lloyd,1 and J. D. Pitout1,2

Calgary Laboratory Services (CLS),1 Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada2

Received 23 February 2007/ Returned for modification 16 April 2007/ Accepted 10 July 2007

The performance of BBL CHROMagar O157 (CHROM) versus that of sorbitol-MacConkey (SMAC) media for detection of Escherichia coli O157 was determined for a 3-month period. Results for 27/3,116 (0.9%) stool cultures were positive. CHROM had a higher sensitivity (96.30%) and negative predictive value (100%) and a better diagnostic efficiency than SMAC. Labor and material costs decreased when CHROM was used.

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Division of Microbiology, Calgary Laboratory Services, 9-3535 Research Rd. N.W., Calgary, Alberta T2N 4B8, Canada. Phone: (403) 770-3281. Fax: (403) 770-3347. E-mail: Deirdre.church{at}cls.ab.ca

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 18 July 2007.

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, September 2007, p. 3098-3100, Vol. 45, No. 9
0095-1137/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.00426-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2007 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.