JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental material
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
JCM.01684-07v1
46/1/136    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Faria, N. A.
Right arrow Articles by de Lencastre, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Faria, N. A.
Right arrow Articles by de Lencastre, H.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, January 2008, p. 136-144, Vol. 46, No. 1
0095-1137/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.01684-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Analysis of Typing Methods for Epidemiological Surveillance of both Methicillin-Resistant and Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Strains{triangledown} ,{dagger}

Nuno A. Faria,1,§ João A. Carrico,2,§* Duarte C. Oliveira,1 Mário Ramirez,3 and Hermínia de Lencastre1,4

Laboratório de Genética Molecular, Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica, Oeiras, Portugal,1 Knowledge Discovery in Bioinformatics Group (KDBIO), Instituto de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores: Investigação e Desenvolvimento (INESC-ID), Lisboa, Portugal,2 Instituto de Medicina Molecular e Instituto de Microbiologia, Faculdade de Medicina de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal,3 Laboratory of Microbiology, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York4

Received 23 August 2007/ Returned for modification 15 October 2007/ Accepted 28 October 2007

Sequence-based methods for typing Staphylococcus aureus, such as multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and spa typing, have increased interlaboratory reproducibility, portability, and speed in obtaining results, but pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), remains the method of choice in many laboratories due to the extensive experience with this methodology and the large body of data accumulated using the technique. Comparisons between typing methods have been overwhelmingly based on a qualitative assessment of the overall agreement of results and the relative discriminatory indexes. In this study, we quantitatively assess the congruence of the major typing methods for S. aureus, using a diverse collection of 198 S. aureus strains previously characterized by PFGE, spa typing, MLST, and, in the case of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), SCCmec typing in order to establish the quantitative congruence between the typing methods. The results of most typing methods agree in that MRSA and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) differ in terms of diversity of genetic backgrounds, with MSSA being more diverse. Our results show that spa typing has a very good predictive power over the clonal relationships defined by eBURST, while PFGE is less accurate for that purpose but nevertheless provides better typeability and discriminatory power. The combination of PFGE and spa typing provided even better results. Based on these observations, we suggest the use of the conjugation of spa typing and PFGE typing for epidemiological surveillance studies, since this combination provides the ability to infer long-term relationships while maintaining the discriminatory power and typeability needed in short-term studies.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Instituto de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores: Investigação e Desenvolvimento (INESC-ID), Rua Alves Redol 9, Apartado 13069, 1000-029 Lisbon, Portugal. Phone: (351) 213 100 272. Fax: (351) 213 145 843. E-mail: jcarrico{at}kdbio.inesc-id.pt

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 7 November 2007.

{dagger} Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://jcm.asm.org/.

§ N.A.F. and J.A.C. contributed equally to this work.


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, January 2008, p. 136-144, Vol. 46, No. 1
0095-1137/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.01684-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2008 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.