JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow An author's correction has been published
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
JCM.01901-07v1
46/1/150    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pfaller, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Diekema, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pfaller, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Diekema, D. J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, January 2008, p. 150-156, Vol. 46, No. 1
0095-1137/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.01901-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

In Vitro Susceptibility of Invasive Isolates of Candida spp. to Anidulafungin, Caspofungin, and Micafungin: Six Years of Global Surveillance{triangledown}

M. A. Pfaller,1* L. Boyken,1 R. J. Hollis,1 J. Kroeger,1 S. A. Messer,1 S. Tendolkar,1 and D. J. Diekema1,2

Departments of Pathology,1 Medicine, Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa2

Received 24 September 2007/ Returned for modification 7 November 2007/ Accepted 12 November 2007

The echinocandins are being used increasingly as therapy for invasive candidiasis. Prospective sentinel surveillance for the emergence of in vitro resistance to the echinocandins among invasive Candida sp. isolates is indicated. We determined the in vitro activities of anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin against 5,346 invasive (bloodstream or sterile-site) isolates of Candida spp. collected from over 90 medical centers worldwide from 1 January 2001 to 31 December 2006. We performed susceptibility testing according to the CLSI M27-A2 method and used RPMI 1640 broth, 24-h incubation, and a prominent inhibition endpoint for determination of the MICs. Of 5,346 invasive Candida sp. isolates, species distribution was 54% C. albicans, 14% C. parapsilosis, 14% C. glabrata, 12% C. tropicalis, 3% C. krusei, 1% C. guilliermondii, and 2% other Candida spp. Overall, all three echinocandins were very active against Candida: anidulafungin (MIC50, 0.06 µg/ml; MIC90, 2 µg/ml), caspofungin (MIC50, 0.03 µg/ml; MIC90, 0.25 µg/ml), micafungin (MIC50, 0.015 µg/ml; MIC90, 1 µg/ml). More than 99% of isolates were inhibited by ≤2 µg/ml of all three agents. Results by species (expressed as the percentages of isolates inhibited by ≤2 µg/ml of anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin, respectively) were as follows: for C. albicans, 99.6%, 100%, and 100%; for C. parapsilosis, 92.5%, 99.9%, and 100%; for C. glabrata, 99.9%, 99.9%, and 100%; for C. tropicalis, 100%, 99.8%, and 100%; for C. krusei, 100%, 100%, and 100%; and for C. guilliermondii, 90.2%, 95.1%, and 100%. There was no significant change in the activities of the three echinocandins over the 6-year study period and no difference in activity by geographic region. All three echinocandins have excellent in vitro activities against invasive strains of Candida isolated from centers worldwide. Our prospective sentinel surveillance reveals no evidence of emerging echinocandin resistance among invasive clinical isolates of Candida spp.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Medical Microbiology Division, C606 GH, Department of Pathology, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA 52242. Phone: (319) 356-8615. Fax: (319) 356-4916. E-mail: michael-pfaller{at}uiowa.edu

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 21 November 2007.


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, January 2008, p. 150-156, Vol. 46, No. 1
0095-1137/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.01901-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2008 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.