| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2008, p. 1381-1385, Vol. 46, No. 4
0095-1137/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JCM.02033-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa,1 Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania,2 VA Boston Healthcare System, West Roxbury, Massachusetts,3 Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland,4 Barnes-Jewish Hospital, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri,5 University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas,6 VA Medical Center, Portland, Oregon7
Received 17 October 2007/ Returned for modification 21 January 2008/ Accepted 19 February 2008
Bloodstream infections are an important cause of morbidity and mortality. Physician orders for blood cultures often specify that blood specimens be collected at or around the time of a temperature elevation, presumably as a means of enhancing the likelihood of detecting significant bacteremia. In a multicenter study, which utilized retrospective patient chart reviews as a means of collecting data, we evaluated the timing of blood culture collection in relation to temperature elevations in 1,436 patients with bacteremia and fungemia. The likelihood of documenting bloodstream infections was not significantly enhanced by collecting blood specimens for culture at the time that patients experienced temperature spikes. A subset analysis based on patient age, gender, white blood cell count and specific cause of bacteremia generally also failed to reveal any associations.
Published ahead of print on 27 February 2008.
| Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. | Clin. Microbiol. Rev. |
|---|---|
| Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |
|---|