| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Division of Viral Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta,1 Atlanta Research and Education Foundation, Decatur, Georgia,2 Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio3
Received 4 December 2007/ Returned for modification 28 January 2008/ Accepted 3 March 2008
Rates of detection of rotavirus were compared by diagnostic assay and specimen type. For bulk stools, rates of detection by reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) and enzyme immunoassay (EIA) were similar, but 18% of healthy controls tested positive by RT-PCR. Testing of bulk stools by EIA appears to be optimum for rotavirus surveillance.
Published ahead of print on 19 March 2008.
| Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. | Clin. Microbiol. Rev. |
|---|---|
| Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |
|---|