This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Borrell, S.
Right arrow Articles by González-Martín, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Borrell, S.
Right arrow Articles by González-Martín, J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, January 2009, p. 198-204, Vol. 47, No. 1
0095-1137/09/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.00507-08
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Factors Associated with Differences between Conventional Contact Tracing and Molecular Epidemiology in Study of Tuberculosis Transmission and Analysis in the City of Barcelona, Spain {triangledown}

Sònia Borrell,1 Montserrat Español,2 Àngels Orcau,3 Griselda Tudó,1 Francesca March,2 Joan A. Caylà,3 Josep Maria Jansà,3 Fernando Alcaide,4 Núria Martín-Casabona,5 Margarita Salvadó,6 José Antonio Martínez,7 Rafael Vidal,8 Francesca Sánchez,9 Neus Altet,10 Pere Coll,11 and Juliàn González-Martín1*

Servei de Microbiologia, CDB, H. Clínic de Barcelona-IDIBAPS, Universitat de Barcelona,1 Servei de Microbiologia, H. U. Sant Pau (HSCSP),2 Servei d'Epidemiologia, Agència de Salut Pública de Barcelona,3 Servei de Microbiologia, H. U. Bellvitge-IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat,4 Servei de Microbiologia, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona,5 Laboratori de Referència de Catalunya, El Prat de Llobregat,6 Servei de Malalties Infeccioses, ICMID, Hospital Clínic-IDIBAPS,7 Servei de Pneumologia, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron,8 Servei de Malalties Infeccioses, Hospital del Mar,9 Unitat de Prevenció i Control de la Tuberculosi,10 Servei de Microbiologia, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Departament de Genètica i Microbiologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain,11

Received 14 March 2008/ Returned for modification 6 July 2008/ Accepted 11 November 2008

The aim of this study was to analyze the factors associated with conventional contact tracing (CCT) and molecular epidemiology (ME) methods in assessing tuberculosis (TB) transmission, comparing the populations studied and the epidemiological links established by both methods. Data were obtained from TB case and CCT registries, and ME was performed using IS6110-based restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis and mycobacterial interspersed repetitive unit 12 (MIRU12) typing as a secondary typing method. During two years (2003 and 2004), 892 cases of TB were reported, of which 687 (77%) were confirmed by culture. RFLP analysis was performed with 463 (67.4%) of the 687 isolated strains, and MIRU12 types in 75 strains were evaluated; 280 strains (60.5%) had a unique RFLP pattern, and 183 (39.5%) shared patterns, grouping into 65 clusters. CCT of 613 (68.7%) of 892 cases detected 44 clusters involving 101 patients. The results of both CCT and ME methods yielded 96 clusters involving 255 patients. The household link was the one most frequently identified by CCT (corresponding to 80.7% of the cases clustered by this method), whereas nonhousehold and unknown links were associated with 94.1% of the strains clustered by ME. When both methods were used in 351 cases (39.3%), they showed the same results in 214 cases (61%). Of the remainder, 106 (30.2%) were clustered only by ME, 19 (5.5%) were clustered only by CCT, and 12 (3.4%) were clustered by both methods but into different clusters. Patients with factors potentially associated with social problems were less frequently studied by CCT (P = 0.002), whereas patients of <15 years of age, most with negative cultures, were less frequently studied by ME (P = 0.005). Significant differences in the populations studied by ME versus CCT were observed, possibly explaining the scarce correlation found between the results of these methods. Moreover, ME allowed the detection of nonhousehold contact relationships, whereas CCT was more useful for tracing transmission chains involving patients of <15 years of age. In conclusion, the two methods are complementary, suggesting the need to improve the methodology of contact study protocols.

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Servei de Microbiologia, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, c/ Villarroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain. Phone: 34932275522. Fax: 34932279372. E-mail: gonzalez{at}clinic.ub.es

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 19 November 2008.

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, January 2009, p. 198-204, Vol. 47, No. 1
0095-1137/09/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.00507-08
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.





Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»