This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rasschaert, G.
Right arrow Articles by Heyndrickx, M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rasschaert, G.
Right arrow Articles by Heyndrickx, M.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, October 2009, p. 3313-3322, Vol. 47, No. 10
0095-1137/09/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.00910-09
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Comparison of Fingerprinting Methods for Typing Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Sequence Type 398{triangledown}

G. Rasschaert,1* W. Vanderhaeghen,2 I. Dewaele,1 N. Janez,1 X. Huijsdens,3 P. Butaye,2,4 and M. Heyndrickx1

Institute for Agricultural and Fisheries Research (ILVO), Technology and Food Science Unit, Brusselsesteenweg 370, 9090 Melle, Belgium,1 Veterinary and Agrochemical Research Centre, Groeselenberg 99, 1180 Brussels, Belgium,2 National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), P.O. Box 1, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands,3 Ghent University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Bacteriology, Pathology and Poultry Diseases, Salisburylaan 133, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium4

Received 8 May 2009/ Returned for modification 23 July 2009/ Accepted 17 August 2009

This study evaluates the multiple-locus variable-number tandem-repeat assay (MLVA) and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) when using restriction enzymes BstZI, SacII, and ApaI to fingerprint a diverse collection of methicillin (meticillin)-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) sequence type 398 (ST398) isolates. These isolates had been characterized previously by multilocus sequence typing, spa typing, and staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) typing. Typeability and discriminatory power were analyzed, and the concordance between the various methods was determined. All MRSA ST398 isolates were typeable by the MLVA and PFGE using BstZI, SacII, and ApaI. With each method, the MRSA ST398 isolates formed a separate group from the two non-ST398 MRSA strains. PFGE, performed with any of the three restriction enzymes, had the most discriminatory power, followed by MLVA, spa typing, and SCCmec typing. The MLVA showed the highest concordance with PFGE using ApaI and spa typing. As further expressed by the Wallace coefficient, the MLVA type was poorly predicted by spa typing, whereas the spa type was well predicted by MLVA. PFGE, using a combination of all three restriction enzymes, had the highest concordance with the MLVA but had a low probability of being predicted by MLVA. PFGE, using a combination of all three restriction enzymes, was able to predict SCCmec type and MLVA type completely and had a high probability of predicting spa type. Both the MLVA and PFGE could be used to discriminate among the MRSA ST398 isolates. Although the MLVA is a faster technique, PFGE had more discriminatory power than the MLVA, especially when a combination of restriction enzymes was used.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Institute for Agricultural and Fisheries Research (ILVO), Technology and Food Science Unit, Brusselsesteenweg 370, 9090 Melle, Belgium. Phone: 32 9 272 30 26. Fax: 32 9 272 30 01. E-mail: geertrui.rasschaert{at}ilvo.vlaanderen.be

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 26 August 2009.


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, October 2009, p. 3313-3322, Vol. 47, No. 10
0095-1137/09/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.00910-09
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.