This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bourbeau, P. P.
Right arrow Articles by Swartz, B. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bourbeau, P. P.
Right arrow Articles by Swartz, B. L.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2009, p. 1101-1106, Vol. 47, No. 4
0095-1137/09/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.01963-08
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

First Evaluation of the WASP, a New Automated Microbiology Plating Instrument{triangledown}

Paul P. Bourbeau* and Brandi Lynn Swartz

Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania

Received 10 October 2008/ Returned for modification 2 December 2008/ Accepted 14 January 2009

Many laboratories are experiencing growing shortages of trained microbiology technologists and technicians. Consequently, there is considerable interest in new automation that could potentially lessen labor demands for specimen processing. In this study, we present the first published evaluation of a new microbiology instrument, the Walk Away Specimen Processor (WASP), manufactured by Copan, Inc., in which we evaluated cross-contamination, the accuracy of plating, and the quality of the results. The absence of cross-contamination was demonstrated by plating a total of 200 alternating inoculated and sterile specimen tubes. The ability of the WASP to subculture enrichment broths was evaluated with 106 Lim broth specimens, with the results being identical to those obtained by testing by routine methods. Plating of urine specimens with the WASP was compared to plating with the Dynacon Inoculab instrument. Three hundred specimens were plated in duplicate on both instruments with 1-µl loops, and 293 specimens were plated in duplicate on both instruments with 10-µl loops. The results of duplicate plating with the same instrument (replicate plating) and of the consensus agreement between the two instruments were compared. The replicate plating results were comparable for both instruments, while the WASP had more specimens with significant results than the Inoculab with the 1-µl loop only. Lastly, for the plating of 113 specimens in ESwab tubes, the manual method and WASP plating each yielded 90 potential pathogens. In summary, we report the first evaluation of a new microbiology specimen-plating instrument, the WASP, which offers opportunities for the automated plating of microbiology specimens to an extent that has not been possible to date.

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Division of Laboratory Medicine, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA 17822-0131. Phone: (570) 271-7467. Fax: (570) 271-6105. E-mail: pbourbeau{at}geisinger.edu

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 21 January 2009.

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2009, p. 1101-1106, Vol. 47, No. 4
0095-1137/09/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.01963-08
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.





Copyright © 2010 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»