JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cooney, M K
Right arrow Articles by Kenny, G E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cooney, M K
Right arrow Articles by Kenny, G E

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1977 February; 5(2): 202-207

Demonstration of dual rhinovirus infection in humans by isolation of different serotypes in human heteroploid (HeLa) and human diploid fibroblast cell cultures.

M K Cooney and G E Kenny

ABSTRACT

The ability to isolate rhinoviruses in human heteroploid cell cultures was investigated by inoculating HeLa cells (HeLa M) with specimens previously shown to be positive in human diploid cell cultures. The 135 positive specimens selected were representative of 22 different rhinovirus types, and 4 to 9 specimens were available for each serotype. Specimens were inoculated into human diploid fetal tonsil fibroblasts (FT), HeLa cells with 30 mM Mg2+, and HeLa cells without increased Mg2+. One hundred twelve rhinovirus strains (83%) were reisolated in FT cells, whereas 76 rhinovirus strains (56%) were recovered in HeLa cells with 30 mM Mg2+. All strains recovered in FT were the same serotype as that originally recovered in diploid cells, but five of the HeLa cell isolates (3.7% of total specimens) were different serotypes, indicating dual rhinovirus infections. Four rhinovirus serotypes, (3, 42, 48, and 70) were recovered in HeLa but not in diploid cells; these serotypes were rare in our previous studies. Isolation of rhinovirus in FT cells was usually accomplished at first passage, whereas rhinovirus cytopathic effects in HeLa cells were not observed at first passage, but required one, two, or (rarely) three blind passages. Only 28 rhinoviruses (21%) were recovered in HeLa cells without increased Mg2+; however, three serotypes, types 16, 36, and 58, were recovered as effectively in HeLa cells, with or without added Mg2+, as they were in FT cells. In general, rhinoviruses were less efficiently recovered in HeLa cells; however, certain serotypes may be detected better by HeLa cells.


J Clin Microbiol. 1977 February; 5(2): 202-207







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1977 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.