This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Brokopp, C. D. Articles by Farmer, J. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Brokopp, C. D. Articles by Farmer, J. J., III

Serological Typing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Use of Commerical Antisera and Live Antigens

^a Department of Parasitology and Laboratory Practice, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514
^b Department of Microbiology and Public Health, School of Medicine, Zaragoza, Spain
^* Bacteriophage-Bacteriocin Laboratory, Enteric Section, Center for Disease Control, Atlanta, Georgia 30333

ABSTRACT

A practical slide agglutination test, with commercial antisera (Difco) and live antigens (antigens of live bacteria) taken directly from 24-h antimicrobial susceptibility plates, has been established for serotyping Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Until recently, the lack of both a standard antigenic scheme and a source of commercial antisera has made serological typing of this organism impractical. A simplified procedure with 17 unabsorbed antisera and live antigens prepared from materials readily available in most clinical microbiology laboratories makes epidemiological typing of this organism possible in hospital laboratories. The distribution of each serotype examined in this study was determined by using 425 consecutive patient isolates from six different hospitals. The distribution of O antigen groups (live antigen) was as follows: O1, 11.5%; O2, 1.6%; O3, 3.8%; O4, 7.8%; O5, 4.2% O6, 27.1%; O7,8, 5.9%; O9, 6.8%; O10, 2.4%; O11, 8.2%; O12 through O17, each less than 1%. Ten and six-tenths percent of the above agglutinated in two antisera, 3.3% agglutinated in more than two antisera, and 5.2% did not agglutinate in any antisera. A comparison of live and heated antigens shows that 93.2% were typable with the live antigen, and 94.5% were typable with the heated antigen. When both antigens were used, we typed 96.3% of 725 isolates. The reproductibility and specificity of the serological procedure were examined. We recommend using the live antigen for routine serological typing in clinical microbiology laboratories for "in house" epidemiology and reserving the heated antigen for reference and research typing (and for those few cases where results cannot be obtained using the live antigen). The application of serotyping in the study of outbreaks of P. aeruginosa is also presented.

¹ Present address: Enteric Section, Center for Disease Control, Atlanta, GA 30333.