JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wang, H S
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, G D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wang, H S
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, G D
J Clin Microbiol. 1977 November; 6(5): 445-449

Evaluation of a caffeic acid-ferric citrate test for rapid identification of Cryptococcus neoformans.

H S Wang, R T Zeimis and G D Roberts

ABSTRACT

An evaluation of a rapid caffeic acid-ferric citrate paper disk test for the identification of Cryptococcus neoformans, using 474 isolates of yeasts and yeastlike organisms, showed that 96.6, 97.7, and 98.3% of 176 isolates of C. neoformans produced brown to dark-brown pigment on disks incubated for 6 h at room temperature, 30 degrees C, and 37 degrees C, respectively. All C. neoformans produced brown to dark-brown pigment within 24 h. However, nonspecific pigmentation was encountered at all temperatures of incubation with one isolate of Trichosporon cutaneum and, at room temperature only, with one isolate of C. luteolus after 6 h. Other genera of yeasts produced similar pigmentation after 24 h at all temperatures. The age of the cultures tested or the types of media used before testing did not significantly affect the ability of C. neoformans to produce pigmentation at 37 degrees C. A positive test may prove useful for presumptive identification of C. neoformans, but a negative reaction should not be used to rule out an identification of this yeast. Since a number of false-negative and false-positive tests occur, it is necessary to confirm, by other biochemical tests, the identification of all organisms suspected of being C. neoformans, to reduct the serious risk of missing or misidentifying this important pathogen.


J Clin Microbiol. 1977 November; 6(5): 445-449




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1977 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.