JCM Email Content Delivery
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
JCM Accepts, published online ahead of print on 23 April 2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dimech, W.
Right arrow Articles by Dax, E. M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dimech, W.
Right arrow Articles by Dax, E. M.
J. Clin. Microbiol. doi:10.1128/JCM.00231-08
Copyright (c) 2008, American Society for Microbiology and/or the Listed Authors/Institutions. All Rights Reserved.

Evaluation of Eight Anti-rubella Immunoglobulin G Immunoassays that Report Results in International Units per Milliliter

Wayne Dimech*, Lena Panagiotopoulos, Barbara Francis, Nicholas Laven, Joan Marler, David Dickeson, Tony Panayotou, Kim Wilson, Robyn Wootten, and Elizabeth M. Dax

National Serology Reference Laboratory, Australia, St. Vincent's Institute, 4th Floor, Healy Building, 41 Victoria Parade, Fitzroy 3065, Department of Serology, Symbion Health, Dorevitch Pathology, 18 Banksia Street, Heidelberg 3084, Centre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology Laboratory Services, Institute of Clinical Pathology and Medical Research, Westmead Hospital, Westmead 2145, Microbiology Department, Southern Health, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton 3168, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3052, Australia

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: wayne{at}nrl.gov.au.


   Abstract

An evaluation of anti-rubella immunoglobulin G immunoassays that report in International Units per milliliter (IU/mL) was performed to determine their analytical performance and the degree of correlation of the test results. A total of 321 samples were characterized based on results from a haemagglutination inhibition assay. The 48 negative and 273 positive samples were used to determine sensitivity and specificity of the assays. When equivocal results were interpreted as reactive, the sensitivity of the immunoassays ranged from 98.9 to 99.9% and the specificity from 77.1 to 95.8%. All assays had positive and negative delta values of less than 2. A significant difference between the mean results of all assays was demonstrated by an analysis of variance. However, Post Hoc analysis showed there was good correlation in the mean results expressed in IU/mL between some of the assays. Our results show the level of standardization between anti-rubella immunoglobulin G immunoassays reporting results expressed as IU/mL has improved since a previous study in 1992 but further improvement is required.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2008 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.