JCM Accepts, published online ahead of print on 17 June 2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ASM journals
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Monsen, T.
Right arrow Articles by Wallinder, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Monsen, T.
Right arrow Articles by Wallinder, L.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J. Clin. Microbiol. doi:10.1128/JCM.02316-08
Copyright (c) 2009, American Society for Microbiology and/or the Listed Authors/Institutions. All Rights Reserved.

The in vitro effect of ultrasound on bacteria and a suggested protocol for sonication and diagnosis of prosthetic infections

Tor Monsen*, Elisabeth Lövgren, Micael Widerström, and Lars Wallinder

Department of Clinical Bacteriology and Department of Orthopedics, University Hospital of Umeå, SE-90185 Umeå, Sweden; Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital of Östersund, SE-83183 Östersund, Sweden; Department of Medical Microbiology, St. Olavs University Hospital and Institute of Laboratory Medicine, Children's and Women's Health, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: tor.monsen{at}climi.umu.se.


arrow
Abstract

Sonication of implants has been shown to be a promising method for diagnosis of prosthetic infections due to its improved sensitivity, simplicity and low cost. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of ultrasound performed during different conditions regarding temperature, duration and composition of sonication tubes on bacterial species often associated with prosthetic infections.

We found that ultrasound had an inhibitory effect on bacteria of which Gram-negative bacteria and in particular E. coli were almost eradicated after 5 minutes of sonication at 35°C. Gram-positive bacteria were found to be resistant to the effect of ultrasound.

Four factors were important for the inhibitory effect of sonication; the type of microorganism, temperature of the sonication buffer, time of exposure to ultrasound (minutes) and the material and composition of sonication tube in which sonication is performed.

Based on the results from the present study we propose a protocol for sonication and recovery of bacteria associated with biofilm on infected implants prior to conventional culture. From the present protocol we recommend sonication for 7 minutes at 22°C at maximum effect which permit survival of Gram-negative bacteria.