Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, January 1998, p. 161-167, Vol. 36, No. 1
0095-1137/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Comparative Analysis of Infrequent-Restriction-Site
PCR and Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis for Epidemiological Typing of
Legionella pneumophila Serogroup 1 Strains
Serge
Riffard,*
François Lo
Presti,
François
Vandenesch,
Françoise
Forey,
Monique
Reyrolle, and
Jerome
Etienne
Centre National de Référence des
Legionella, Laboratoire de Bactériologie, UPRES EA1655,
Faculté de Médecine R.T.H. Laënnec, 69372 Lyon Cedex
08, France
Received 22 July 1997/Returned for modification 24 September
1997/Accepted 8 October 1997
 |
ABSTRACT |
Two methods were compared for the analysis of 48 unrelated and
epidemiologically related Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 isolates. These are the infrequent-restriction-site PCR (IRS-PCR) assay with adapters designed for XbaI and PstI
restriction sites and the pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE)
analysis determined after DNA restriction with SfiI. Both
methods demonstrated a high level of discrimination with a similar
capacity for differentiating 23 of the 24 unrelated isolates. PFGE
analysis and IRS-PCR assay were both able to identify epidemiologically
related isolates of L. pneumophila from three outbreaks.
Hence, IRS-PCR assay appears to be a reproducible (intergel
reproducibility, 100%) and discriminative (discriminatory index,
0.996) tool for typing of Legionella. Compared to PFGE,
however, IRS-PCR presented an advantage through ease of performance and
with attributes of rapidity and sensitivity of target DNA.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The family Legionellaceae
is represented to date by 42 species (3, 11), most of which
are potentially pathogenic for humans. Legionella
pneumophila serogroup 1 is the major causative agent associated
with legionellosis (2). L. pneumophila is widely
present in the environment, especially in water distribution systems;
thus, the source of a given human infection cannot be presumed on the
single basis of an isolation of L. pneumophila from an
environmental source. Hence, epidemiological tools are needed to
determine the clonal relatedness between isolates of human and
environmental origins. A variety of molecular typing techniques have
been developed to compare L. pneumophila serogroup 1 strains, including analysis by monoclonal antibodies, arbitrarily primed and repetitive element PCR assays, plasmid analysis, multilocus enzyme analysis, restriction fragment length polymorphism, ribotyping, and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) (1, 4, 6, 7, 14-16,
19, 20-23). Most of the recent findings suggest that restriction
enzyme analysis by PFGE is the most discriminative epidemiological
marker for subtyping L. pneumophila strains (15, 20,
22). Nevertheless, PFGE is a time-consuming method which requires
expensive and specialized equipment.
A recently described method referred to as infrequent-restriction-site
PCR (IRS-PCR) assay (17) consists of double digestion of
genomic DNA with a restriction enzyme that infrequently cuts the
chromosome and a second enzyme that frequently cuts it, followed by
amplification of DNA with primers and adapters targeting the extremities of the restricted fragments. This technique has the advantage of using minute quantities of target DNA, and the separation of amplified fragments can be achieved by conventional agarose gel
electrophoresis. The method has not previously been applied to
Legionella.
In this study, we have adapted the IRS-PCR method to analyze 48 unrelated and epidemiologically related L. pneumophila
serogroup 1 isolates and compared the results with those obtained by
PFGE. The IRS-PCR technique appeared to be rapid, versatile,
reproducible, and useful for discrimination of L. pneumophila serogroup 1 isolates.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Bacterial strains.
Twenty-five environmental and 23 clinical
isolates of L. pneumophila serogroup 1 were obtained from
the National Reference Center (France) for Legionella (Table
1). Among these, 6 human and 18 environmental isolates were associated with three outbreaks, the others
being epidemiologically unrelated. Strains were cultured on buffered
charcoal yeast extract
agar and were biochemically characterized
according to standard methods (3). Strains were identified
by direct immunofluorescence assays with a commercial monoclonal
antibody (Monofluo Kit Legionella pneumophila; Diagnostics Pasteur, Paris, France) (8) and with specific antisera
prepared by rabbit immunization at the Reference Center.
IRS-PCR. (i) Adapters and primers.
Adapters were constructed
as previously described by Mazurek et al. (17) with
oligonucleotides purchased from Eurogentec SA (Seraing, Belgium). These
were AX1, AX2, and PX-G, as described elsewhere (17), and
PS1 (5'-GAC TCG ACT CGC ATG CA-3') and PS2 (5'-TGC GAG T-3'), which
were specifically designed in this study to generate PstI
adapters. Adapters were also designed to ligate specifically to the
cohesive ends of the corresponding restricted fragments. To prepare the
adapters, oligonucleotides PS1 and PS2 or AX1 and AX2 were mixed in
equal molar amounts in 1× PCR buffer (Perkin-Elmer Cetus, Branchburg,
N.J.) and were allowed to anneal as the mixture cooled from 80 to 4°C
over 1 h in a thermocycler. Oligonucleotides PS1 and PX-G were
used as primers in PCR.
(ii) Preparation of template DNA.
Bacterial cultures were
harvested and resuspended in 500 µl of STE buffer (100 mM NaCl, 50 mM
Tris-HCl, 10 mM sodium EDTA [pH 7.5]) and incubated at room
temperature with 100 µl of lysozyme (10 mg/ml) for 1 h. Cells
were lysed with 20 µl of sodium dodecyl sulfate (25 mg/ml) at 37°C
and digested for 1 h with 100 µl of proteinase K (25 mg/ml)-5
µl of RNase (10 mg/ml) at 37°C. DNA was purified with
phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (50:48:2) (13) and
chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (24:1) and precipitated by the addition of
absolute ethanol. The pellet was air dried, resuspended in 100 µl of
sterile distilled water, and stored at
20°C until used. A portion
of the extracted DNA was digested with 40 U of PstI-40 U of
XbaI in 1× buffer for 90 min at 37°C. T4 DNA ligase (15 U), ATP (12.6 pmol), 10× ligase buffer (0.75 µl), the
XbaI adapter (20 pmol), the PstI adapter (20 pmol), and sterile distilled water were added to 12.5 µl of extract
for a total volume of 20 µl. The mixture was incubated at 16°C for
1 h and then at 65°C for 20 min to inactivate T4 DNA ligase. The sample was digested with 10 U of XbaI-10 U of
PstI at 37°C for 15 min to cleave any restriction sites
re-formed by ligation and then submitted to amplification. All enzymes
were obtained from Boehringer Mannheim (Meylan, France).
(iii) Amplification.
Each PCR mixture included 10 µl of
template DNA, 0.5 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Perkin-Elmer
Cetus), deoxynucleoside triphosphates (200 µM each) (Pharmacia
Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden), and the oligonucleotide primers in 1× PCR
buffer. Typically, the oligonucleotides PS1 and PX-G were used together
as primers. Amplification was performed in a PHC-3 Dri-Block cycler
(Techne Ltd., Cambridge, United Kingdom) with an amplification profile
that consisted of an initial denaturation step at 94°C for 5 min and
then 30 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, primer
annealing at 60°C for 30 s, and extension at 72°C for 90 s. All experiments included negative controls which were processed with
the samples.
Electrophoretic patterns.
Gel electrophoresis was performed
for 4 h at 100 V on the PCR products loaded into wells of 1.5%
agarose prepared in 0.5× Tris-borate-EDTA (SeaKem GTG; FMC
Bioproducts, Rockland, Maine). DNA VI molecular weight markers
(Boehringer Mannheim) were used.
PFGE typing.
PFGE patterns were obtained by the modified
technique of Grothues and Tümmler (10). Briefly,
agarose blocks were digested with SfiI overnight at 50°C
followed by electrophoresis with the contour-clamped homogeneous
electric field DRII system (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, Calif.).
Separations were accomplished at constant pulse times (25 s) for
11 h and increasing pulse times (35 to 60 s) for 11 h.
Lambda concatemers (PFGE marker I; Boehringer Mannheim) were used as
size markers.
Gel staining and data processing.
Gels were stained with
ethidium bromide (0.5 mg/ml) (Bioprobe Systems, Paris, France) for 10 min and photographed (Polaroid, Cambridge, Mass.) with UV illumination.
Pattern clustering on a matrix of Dice coefficient (5) was
based on the unweighted pair group method with averages (UPGMA), and
dendrograms were constructed with Taxotron software (Institut Pasteur,
Paris, France). Interpretations for PFGE and IRS-PCR were based on
differences of banding patterns as suggested by Tenover et al.
(24). Strains differing in up to three fragments only were
deemed clonally related, and these strains were described as subtypes
of a given clonal type. In the case of no differences between banding
patterns, strains were considered identical. When differing in four or
more fragments, strains were considered separate types. Major genotypes were labeled by letters, and each of their variant subtypes was indicated by a numeral suffix.
Determination of reproducibility and discriminatory ability.
To assess the reproducibility of IRS-PCR typing, 24 different pairs of
isolates were analyzed in two different runs. Reproducibility was
defined as the percentage of pairs with concordant types. The index of
discriminatory ability was calculated as described by Hunter and Gaston
(12) on the basis of the type distribution among the 24 epidemiologically unrelated L. pneumophila serogroup 1 isolates.
 |
RESULTS |
IRS-PCR analysis.
The patterns generated with PX-G and PS1
primers were composed of 12 to 15 bands ranging in size between 100 and
1,100 bp (Fig. 1). The intergel
reproducibility of banding patterns was 100% for 24 duplicate pairs.
When a three-band difference was used to distinguish IRS-PCR types, a
total of 26 types were recognized and labeled A to c (Table 1). For the
24 isolates tested which were not epidemologically related, 23 distinctive patterns were obtained and the discriminatory index was
0.996. One of these patterns (A) was divided into two subtypes (A1 and
A2) which differed by no more than two fragments (Table 1). For the
outbreak-associated isolates, IRS-PCR analysis yielded three different
patterns (types a, b, and c). Isolates from outbreaks 1 and 3 each
presented consistent types; this contrasted with those of outbreak 2, manifesting two subtypes (b1 and b2), based on the presence of an
additional 0.6-kb fragment in b2.

View larger version (86K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
IRS-PCR electrophoretic patterns of L. pneumophila serogroup 1 isolates from patients or environmental
samples in different geographic locations. Lanes M, VI molecular weight
markers (Boehringer Mannheim); lane 1, isolate L32; lane 2, isolate
L38; lane 3, isolate L3; lane 4, isolate L524; lane 5, isolate L387;
lane 6, isolate L215; lane 7, isolate L41; lane 8, isolate L54; lane 9, isolate L401; lane 10, isolate L392; lane 11, negative control.
|
|
When a one-band difference was used to distinguish IRS-PCR types, a
total of 28 types were recognized and termed A to d. For the 24 isolates tested which were not epidemiologically related, 24 distinctive patterns were obtained, giving a discriminatory index of 1. For the isolates associated with outbreaks, IRS-PCR analysis yielded
four different patterns (types a, b, c, and d). For outbreak 2, when a
one-band difference was used to distinguish IRS-PCR types, two types (b
and d) of isolates were recognized.
Macrorestriction analysis of genomic DNAs with PFGE.
Macrorestriction profiles generated by SfiI cleavage
consisted of 9 to 15 fragments varying in size between 100 and 1,000 kb
(Fig. 2). A total of 26 types were
recognized (A to c). Twenty-four isolates which were not
epidemiologically related showed 23 distinctive patterns, and the
discriminatory index was 0.996. Two isolates (L23 and L48) were
recognized as subclonal types by comparing their PFGE patterns (G1 and
G2), based on the presence of an additional 100-kb fragment in G2. For
the outbreak-associated isolates, three major groups of
macrorestriction patterns (a, b, and c) were recognized. Each
isolate comprising a given outbreak was identical in pattern.

View larger version (89K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
PFGE patterns of L. pneumophila serogroup 1 isolates from patients or environmental samples in different geographic
locations. Lanes M, PFGE I markers (Boehringer Mannheim); lane 1, isolate L32; lane 2, isolate L38; lane 3, isolate L3; lane 4, isolate
L524; lane 5, isolate L387; lane 6, isolate L215; lane 7, isolate L41;
lane 8, isolate L54; lane 9, isolate L401; lane 10, isolate L392; lane
11, negative control.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
PFGE analysis is a highly efficient means of distinguishing
between strains of Legionella during outbreaks (20,
27). Together with SfiI-digested DNA, this very
sensitive typing system is labor-intensive and expensive compared to
the PCR-based methodology. PCR-based typing techniques used for
analysis of L. pneumophila strains during outbreaks include
the arbitrarily primed PCR assay, randomly amplified polymorphic DNA
analysis (9, 26), and amplified fragment length polymorphism
(AFLP) analysis (25). The reproducibility of arbitrarily
primed PCR and randomly amplified polymorphic DNA methods is affected
by various parameters including (i) the method of DNA extraction
(9, 26), (ii) the purity of the oligonucleotide primers
(26), (iii) the quality of materials (thermocyclers, Taq polymerase origin, and electrophoresis apparatus)
(18), and (iv) the low-stringency hybridization conditions
(7). AFLP and IRS-PCR overcome all these disadvantages since
these methods depend on double digests of genomic DNAs, which are
specifically amplified under stringent conditions with selective
primers extending beyond the adapters. In the AFLP method, the two
adapters consist of 18- to 22-bp oligonucleotides whereas in the
IRS-PCR method, one of the two oligonucleotides is short enough to
allow efficient ligation of the double-stranded adapter at 16°C but
cannot form stable hybrids at higher temperatures nor compete for
primer during subsequent PCR steps. Moreover, this short
oligonucleotide (PS2) is not phosphorylated and therefore not ligated
(it does not interfere with the PCR). Indeed, due to the presence of an
excess of adapter after ligation in the AFLP method, an ethanol
purification step would be recommended to avoid interference in the
subsequent PCR amplification (25). The application of AFLP
is also restricted by a patent registered in 1992 (European patent
application 054858A1).
The results of this study show that PFGE analysis with SfiI
and IRS-PCR assay with PstI and XbaI were both
able to identify epidemiologically related isolates of L. pneumophila when applied to three outbreaks (Fig.
3 and
4).
For each outbreak, both PFGE and IRS-PCR produced isolate profiles that
were concordant between those from the patients and the sources of
transmission. Rules on interpretation of PFGE and IRS-PCR were based
principally on the guidelines described by Tenover et al. for
interpreting macrorestriction patterns (24); these regard
differences in three bands or less in defining members of a subtype.
Hence, when applied to unrelated isolates, PFGE presented
discriminatory power (D = 0.996) identical to that of
IRS-PCR. PFGE considered IRS-PCR subtypes A1 and A2 of unrelated
strains to be two different types (A and B); conversely, two PFGE
subtypes (G1 and G2) were considered to be two distinct IRS-PCR types
(F and G). If IRS-PCR types were defined by a difference of one band
only, the discriminatory power of IRS-PCR for differentiating unrelated
strains was equal to 1 and two types (b and d) of isolates associated
with outbreak 2 were recognized.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Clustering of L. pneumophila serogroup 1 isolates by analysis of IRS-PCR patterns. (B) Schematic representation
of IRS-PCR patterns. Lanes H, patient isolates; lanes E, environmental
isolates. Names of epidemiologically related isolates are followed by
an asterisk. (A) Dendrogram corresponding to panel B in accordance with
UPGMA clustering (error, 3.5 to 4.5%) on a matrix based on the Dice
coefficient (Taxotron software analysis; Institut Pasteur).
|
|

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Clustering of L. pneumophila serogroup 1 isolates by analysis of PFGE patterns. (B) Schematic representation of
PFGE patterns. Lanes H, patient isolates; lanes E, environmental
isolates. Names of epidemiologically related isolates are followed by
an asterisk. (A) Dendrogram corresponding to panel B in accordance with
UPGMA clustering (error, 3.5 to 5%) on a matrix based on the Dice
coefficient (Taxotron software analysis; Institut Pasteur).
|
|
Both techniques used in this study yielded well-resolved, easily
compared restriction fragment patterns, but PFGE was time-consuming (at
least 3 to 4 days to complete) and labor-intensive. IRS-PCR possesses
the attributes of ease of performance, reproducibility (intergel
reproducibility, 100%), and much less time consumption (from time of
receipt of an isolate, less than 2 days to complete without intensive
labor). Also, minute quantities of target DNA are sufficient for PCR
amplification. The fragments amplified by IRS-PCR have small molecular
sizes (less than 1,100 bp), facilitating separation in 3 to 4 h by
standard agarose gel electrophoresis. Moreover, IRS-PCR is less
expensive to operate than PFGE in terms of both equipment and
consumables.
The IRS-PCR method appears to be a potentially useful epidemiologic
tool for the early investigations of L. pneumophila
serogroup 1 isolates in hospital and regional laboratories. The results based on epidemiological markers could then be confirmed in the reference laboratory.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
This work was supported by a grant from the Bureau des Ressources
Génétiques.
We thank M. Goldner for editorial assistance. We are grateful to H. Lelièvre for photography and C. Bouveyron, D. de Longevialle, P. Lefevre, M. Siffert, and C. Vallier for technical support.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: UPRES EA1655,
Faculté de Médecine R.T.H. Laënnec, rue Guillaume
Paradin, 69372 Lyon Cedex 08, France. Phone: (33) 478 77 86 57. Fax:
(33) 478 77 86 58. E-mail:
derba{at}cimac-res.univ-lyon1.fr.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Bangsborg, J. M.,
P. Gerner-Smidt,
H. Colding,
N. E. Fiehn,
B. Bruun, and N. Hoiby.
1995.
Restriction fragment length polymorphism of rRNA genes for molecular typing of members of the family Legionellaceae.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
33:402-406[Abstract].
|
| 2.
|
Bartlett, C. L. R.,
A. D. Macrae, and J. T. Macfarlane.
1986.
Clinical aspects and diagnosis of Legionella infection, p. 37-55.
In
C. L. R. Bartlett, A. D. Macrae, and J. T. Macfarlane (ed.), Legionella infections 1986. Edward Arnold, London, United Kingdom.
|
| 3.
|
Benson, R. F.,
W. L. Thacker,
M. I. Daneshvar, and D. J. Brenner.
1996.
Legionella waltersii sp. nov. and an unnamed Legionella genomospecies isolated from water in Australia.
Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.
46:631-634[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Bingen, E. H.,
E. Denamur, and J. Elion.
1994.
Use of ribotyping in epidemiological surveillance of nosocomial outbreaks.
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
7:311-327[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Dice, L. R.
1945.
Measures of the amount of ecological association between species.
Ecology
26:297-302.
|
| 6.
|
Georghiou, P. R.,
A. M. Doggett,
M. A. Kielhofner,
J. E. Stout,
D. A. Watson,
J. R. Lupski, and R. J. Hamill.
1994.
Molecular fingerprinting of Legionella species by repetitive element PCR.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
32:2989-2994[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Gomez-Lus, P.,
B. S. Fields,
R. F. Benson,
W. T. Martin,
S. P. O'Connor, and C. M. Black.
1993.
Comparison of arbitrarily primed polymerase chain reaction ribotyping and monoclonal antibody analysis for subtyping Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
31:1940-1942[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Gosting, L. H.,
K. Cabrian,
J. C. Sturge, and L. C. Goldstein.
1984.
Monoclonal antibody to a species-specific antigen of Legionella pneumophila.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
20:1031-1035[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Grattard, F.,
P. Berthelot,
M. Reyrolle,
A. Ros,
J. Etienne, and B. Pozzetto.
1996.
Molecular typing of nosocomial strains of Legionella pneumophila by arbitrarily primed PCR.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
34:1595-1598[Abstract].
|
| 10.
|
Grothues, D., and B. Tümmler.
1987.
Genome analysis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa by field inversion gel electrophoresis.
FEMS Microbiol. Lett.
48:419-422.
|
| 11.
|
Hookey, J. V.,
N. A. Saunders,
N. K. Fry,
R. J. Birtles, and T. G. Harrison.
1996.
Phylogeny of Legionellaceae based on small-subunit ribosomal DNA sequences and proposal of Legionella lytica comb. nov. for Legionella-like amoebal pathogens.
Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.
46:526-531[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Hunter, P. R., and M. A. Gaston.
1988.
Numerical index of the discriminatory ability of typing systems: an application of Simpson's index of diversity.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
26:2465-2466[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Marmur, J.
1961.
A procedure for the isolation of deoxyribonucleic acid from microorganisms.
J. Mol. Biol.
3:208-218.
|
| 14.
|
Marques, M. T.,
N. Bornstein, and J. Fleurette.
1995.
Combined monoclonal antibody typing, multilocus enzyme electrophoresis, soluble protein profiles and plasmid analysis of clinical and environmental Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 isolated in a Portuguese hospital.
J. Hosp. Infect.
30:103-110[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Marrie, T. J.,
W. Johnson,
S. Tyler,
G. Bezanson,
D. Haldane,
S. Burbridge, and J. Joly.
1995.
Potable water and nosocomial Legionnaires' disease check water from all rooms in which patient has stayed.
Epidemiol. Infect.
114:267-276[Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Marrie, T. J.,
W. M. Johnson,
S. D. Tyler,
G. S. Bezanson, and S. Burbridge.
1994.
Genomic stability of Legionella pneumophila isolates recovered from two cardiac transplant patients with nosocomial Legionnaires' disease.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
32:3085-3087[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Mazurek, G. H.,
V. Reddy,
B. J. Marston,
W. H. Haas, and J. T. Crawford.
1996.
DNA fingerprinting by infrequent-restriction-site amplification.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
34:2386-2390[Abstract].
|
| 18.
|
Meunier, J.-R., and P. A. D. Grimont.
1993.
Factors affecting reproducibility of random amplified polymorphic DNA fingerprinting.
Res. Microbiol.
144:373-379[Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Ott, M.,
L. Bender,
R. Marre, and J. Hacker.
1991.
Pulsed field electrophoresis of genomic restriction fragments for the detection of nosocomial Legionella pneumophila in hospital water supplies.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
29:813-815[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Pruckler, J. M.,
L. A. Mermel,
R. F. Benson,
C. Giorgio,
P. K. Cassiday,
R. F. Breiman,
C. G. Whitney, and B. S. Fields.
1995.
Comparison of Legionella pneumophila isolates by arbitrarily primed PCR and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: analysis from seven epidemic investigations.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
33:2872-2875[Abstract].
|
| 21.
|
Saunders, N. A.,
T. G. Harrison,
A. Haththotuwa,
N. Kachwalla, and A. G. Taylor.
1990.
A method for typing strains of Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 by analysis of restriction fragment length polymorphisms.
J. Med. Microbiol.
31:45-55[Abstract].
|
| 22.
|
Schoonmaker, D.,
T. Heimberg, and G. Birkhead.
1992.
Comparison of ribotyping and restriction enzyme analysis using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for distinguishing Legionella pneumophila isolates obtained during a nosocomial outbreak.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
30:1491-1498[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Struelens, M. J.,
N. Maes,
F. Rost,
A. Deplano,
F. Jacobs,
C. Liesnard,
N. Bornstein,
F. Grimont,
S. Lauwers,
M. P. McIntyre, and E. Serruys.
1992.
Genotypic and phenotypic methods for the investigation of a nosocomial Legionella pneumophila outbreak and efficacy of control measures.
J. Infect. Dis.
166:22-30[Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Tenover, F. C.,
R. D. Arbeit,
R. V. Goering,
P. A. Mickelsen,
B. E. Murray,
D. H. Persing, and B. Swaminathan.
1995.
Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
33:2233-2239[Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Valsangiacomo, C.,
F. Baggi,
V. Gaia,
T. Balmelli,
R. Peduzzi, and J.-C. Piffaretti.
1995.
Use of amplified fragment length polymorphism in molecular typing of Legionella pneumophila and application to epidemiological studies.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
33:1716-1719[Abstract].
|
| 26.
|
Van Belkum, A.
1996.
Molecular typing methods for epidemiological studies in medical microbiology.
Med. Microbiol. Lett.
5:271-283.
|
| 27.
|
Van Belkum, A.,
M. Struelens, and W. Quint.
1993.
Typing of Legionella pneumophila strains by polymerase chain reaction-mediated DNA fingerprinting.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
31:2198-2200[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, January 1998, p. 161-167, Vol. 36, No. 1
0095-1137/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Aurell, H., Farge, P., Meugnier, H., Gouy, M., Forey, F., Lina, G., Vandenesch, F., Etienne, J., Jarraud, S.
(2005). Clinical and Environmental Isolates of Legionella pneumophila Serogroup 1 Cannot Be Distinguished by Sequence Analysis of Two Surface Protein Genes and Three Housekeeping Genes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
71: 282-289
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Moissenet, D., Vu-Thien, H., Benzerara, Y., Arlet, G.
(2003). DNA Fingerprinting of Ralstonia paucula by Infrequent-Restriction-Site PCR and Randomly Amplified Polymorphic DNA Analysis. J. Clin. Microbiol.
41: 5747-5749
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kyme, P., Dillon, B., Iredell, J.
(2003). Phase variation in Bartonella henselae. Microbiology
149: 621-629
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Cordevant, C., Tang, J. S., Cleland, D., Lange, M.
(2003). Characterization of Members of the Legionellaceae Family by Automated Ribotyping. J. Clin. Microbiol.
41: 34-43
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Fields, B. S., Benson, R. F., Besser, R. E.
(2002). Legionella and Legionnaires' Disease: 25 Years of Investigation. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
15: 506-526
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Franciosa, G., Tartaro, S., Wedell-Neergaard, C., Aureli, P.
(2001). Characterization of Listeria monocytogenes Strains Involved in Invasive and Noninvasive Listeriosis Outbreaks by PCR-Based Fingerprinting Techniques. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
67: 1793-1799
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Garaizar, J., López-Molina, N., Laconcha, I., Lau Baggesen, D., Rementeria, A., Vivanco, A., Audicana, A., Perales, I.
(2000). Suitability of PCR Fingerprinting, Infrequent-Restriction-Site PCR, and Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis, Combined with Computerized Gel Analysis, in Library Typing of Salmonella enterica Serovar Enteritidis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
66: 5273-5281
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Handley, S. A., Regnery, R. L.
(2000). Differentiation of Pathogenic Bartonella Species by Infrequent Restriction Site PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol.
38: 3010-3015
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lo Presti, F., Riffard, S., Jarraud, S., Le Gallou, F., Richet, H., Vandenesch, F., Etienne, J.
(2000). Isolation of Legionella oakridgensis from Two Patients with Pleural Effusion Living in the Same Geographical Area. J. Clin. Microbiol.
38: 3128-3130
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Yoo, J.-H., Choi, J.-H., Shin, W.-S., Huh, D.-H., Cho, Y.-K., Kim, K.-M., Kim, M.-Y., Kang, M.-W.
(1999). Application of Infrequent-Restriction-Site PCR to Clinical Isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii and Serratia marcescens. J. Clin. Microbiol.
37: 3108-3112
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Montanaro-Punzengruber, J. C., Hicks, L., Meyer, W., Gilbert, G. L.
(1999). Australian Isolates of Legionella longbeachae Are Not a Clonal Population. J. Clin. Microbiol.
37: 3249-3254
[Abstract]
[Full Text]