Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, January 1998, p. 179-183, Vol. 36, No. 1
0095-1137/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Determination of Penicillin MICs for
Streptococcus pneumoniae by Using a Two- or Three-Disk
Diffusion Procedure
Michael R.
Jacobs,1,*
Saralee
Bajaksouzian,1
Elizabeth L.
Palavecino-Fasola,1
Henry M.
Holoszyc,2 and
Peter
C.
Appelbaum3
Department of Pathology, Case Western Reserve
University, and University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio
441061;
Giles Scientific, Inc., New
York, New York 100112; and
Department of Pathology, Hershey Medical Center, Hershey,
Pennsylvania 170333
Received 26 June 1997/Returned for modification 4 August
1997/Accepted 16 October 1997
 |
ABSTRACT |
The potential for the use of the disk diffusion method to
accurately predict penicillin MICs for Streptococcus
pneumoniae was investigated with penicillin (6 µg), methicillin
(5 µg), and oxacillin (1 µg) disks. A total of 183 S. pneumoniae isolates were tested by three MIC procedures (agar
dilution, microdilution, and E-test). Regression analyses of the
geometric mean of the three MIC results against (i) the sum of the zone
diameters for methicillin, penicillin, and oxacillin disks; (ii) the
sum of the zone diameters for methicillin and penicillin disks; and
(iii) each of the three individual zone diameters were performed.
Calculated MICs were determined from each of these regression analyses
and compared to the mean reference MICs. A high level of correlation was obtained with both the two- and the three-disk procedures (r = 0.97), with essential agreement rates (±1
doubling dilution) between MICs calculated by the three-disk procedure
and the two-disk procedure and the mean reference MICs of 98.4 and
98.9%, respectively. No major or very major errors were obtained with
the two- or three-disk procedures. The accuracy of the disks used
individually was lower (r = 0.84 to 0.93). However,
oxacillin and methicillin disk testing remain excellent for screening
strains, with all penicillin-susceptible strains having zones of >21
and >22 mm, respectively. The combination disk procedure, which
involves the use of three disks (methicillin, oxacillin, and
penicillin) or two disks (methicillin and penicillin) for testing
S. pneumoniae, can provide accurate penicillin MICs and
qualitative category results that are comparable to results obtained by
the E-test, agar, and microdilution MIC methods.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Clinical microbiology laboratories
are faced with the challenge of reliably detecting bacterial resistance
to antimicrobial agents, and at the same time, reducing their
laboratory costs. As resistance rates increase, additional
susceptibility testing is required, which increases laboratory costs.
For example, since it was first reported in 1967, Streptococcus
pneumoniae resistance to penicillin has been recognized worldwide
(1, 6, 8, 10, 14, 16, 18, 23). In recent studies, penicillin
resistance rates as high as 30% have been reported in some pediatric
populations (2, 6).
Based on the current prevalence of resistance, susceptibility testing
of pneumococcal strains is often important for patient care as well as
for tracking epidemiological trends. S. pneumoniae isolates
are considered susceptible to penicillin if MICs are
0.06 µg/ml,
intermediate if MICs are 0.12 to 1 µg/ml, and resistant if MICs are
2 µg/ml (10, 22). The current recommendation for the
determination of penicillin susceptibility is to perform a MIC analysis
by an approved method or to first screen for penicillin resistance by
disk diffusion with a 1-µg oxacillin disk, followed by MIC
determination for strains with zone diameters of
19 mm. Penicillin-susceptible strains are also susceptible to other
-lactam antibiotics approved for treating pneumococcal infections, and other
-lactams usually do not need to be tested (1, 22).
The use of disk diffusion for screening strains of S. pneumoniae was first described by Dixon et al. in 1977 with 1-µg
oxacillin disks, as 6-µg penicillin disks did not reliably detect all
resistant strains (5). Methicillin was reported to have
similar utility shortly thereafter (10, 11). Since then,
other studies have confirmed the utility of oxacillin and methicillin
disks (12, 24), and the oxacillin disk is the currently
recommended screening procedure (21, 22). Susceptible
strains of pneumococci reliably produce oxacillin zones of 20 mm or
greater. However, it has been clearly demonstrated that oxacillin zones
of
19 mm have been obtained not only with penicillin-resistant and
-intermediate strains but also with some penicillin-susceptible strains
(6, 12, 17, 24). These strains, which produce oxacillin
zones of 7 to 19 mm, usually have MICs at the upper limit of the
susceptible category (0.06 µg/ml) and have been shown to have altered
penicillin-binding proteins (9).
The present study was conducted in order to evaluate the use of a less
costly procedure for obtaining penicillin MIC results for S. pneumoniae. Disk diffusion testing with oxacillin, penicillin, and
methicillin disks and three different MIC procedures were performed on
183 isolates of S. pneumoniae. The results of MIC and disk
diffusion tests were compared in order to determine if results from any
single disk or a combination of disks could be used to accurately
calculate MICs. The use of a combination of disks of varying penicillin
content has been demonstrated previously to be an accurate method of
determining penicillin MICs for Neisseria gonorrhoeae
(13).
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Bacterial isolates.
One hundred eighty-three S. pneumoniae strains isolated from clinical infections and carriers
in the United States, Europe, and South Africa were selected. Strains
were identified by typical Gram stain and colonial morphology,
alpha-hemolysis, inhibition by optochin, bile solubility, and positive
capsular swelling with pneumococcal omniserum (14). Strains
were chosen to include approximately one-third penicillin susceptible,
one-third penicillin intermediate, and one-third penicillin resistant.
Strains were stored at
70°C and subcultured to blood agar plates at
least twice prior to testing.
Susceptibility testing. (i) Agar dilution MIC determination.
MICs were determined on Mueller-Hinton agar (Difco, Detroit, Mich.)
supplemented with 5% sheep blood (Cleveland Scientific, Bath, Ohio)
(11, 20). Concentrations of penicillin tested were doubling
dilutions from 0.008 to 64 µg/ml. Plates were refrigerated and used
within 24 h of preparation. Organism suspensions were prepared in
saline from overnight growth on blood agar plates to the density of a
0.5 McFarland standard, diluted 1:10, and inoculated onto
penicillin-containing plates with a Steers replicator with 3-mm pins
delivering inocula of 1 µl (104 CFU/spot). Plates were
incubated in 5% CO2 at 35°C for 24 h.
(ii) Microdilution MIC determination.
Microdilution trays
were prepared according to the National Committee for Clinical
Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) method with cation-adjusted
Mueller-Hinton broth (Difco) supplemented with 5% lysed horse blood
(Cleveland Scientific) (4, 20). The penicillin concentration
in the trays ranged from 0.008 to 16 µg/ml. Organism suspensions were
prepared in saline from overnight growth on blood agar plates to the
density of a 0.5 McFarland standard. This organism suspension was then
diluted to provide a final inoculum of 105 to
106 CFU/ml. The microdilution trays were incubated in
ambient air at 35°C for 24 h.
(iii) E-test MIC determination.
E-test penicillin G strips
(AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden) graduated from 0.016 to 256 µg/ml were
used (15). Organism suspensions were prepared in saline from
overnight growth on blood agar plates to the density of a 0.5 McFarland
standard. A swab from this organism suspension was used to inoculate
15-cm-diameter Mueller-Hinton plates with 5% sheep blood (Becton
Dickinson, Cockeysville, Md.) with a three-direction inoculation
procedure. The penicillin E-test strips were placed on the plates,
which were incubated at 35°C in 5% CO2 for 24 h.
MICs were read at the point of intersection between the ellipse edge
and the E-test strip. Intermediate E-test MICs were adjusted up to the
next-highest doubling-dilution value for comparative purposes
(15).
(iv) Disk diffusion testing.
Disk diffusion tests were
performed according to NCCLS methods with Mueller-Hinton agar
supplemented with 5% sheep blood (Becton Dickinson) (21,
22). Disks containing 6 µg of penicillin, 1 µg of oxacillin,
and 5 µg of methicillin were applied to the same plates inoculated
for the E-test procedure. Plates were incubated at 35°C in 5%
CO2 for 24 h. Zone diameters were measured with calipers to the nearest millimeter.
(v) Quality control.
For all methods, NCCLS-recommended
quality control strains, including S. pneumoniae (ATCC
49619), were included in each test run (22). Results
were accepted only if quality control results were within the
NCCLS-specified ranges.
Validation.
Sixty selected strains of S. pneumoniae were chosen from recent clinical isolates to include 20 strains in each category (susceptible, intermediate, and resistant) for
validation of the disk methods with criteria described by Tenover et
al. (25). Strains were tested by broth microdilution with
commercially available dried panels (Accumed, Westlake, Ohio)
reconstituted with Mueller-Hinton broth with 5% lysed horse blood
according to the manufacturer's directions. This method complies with
the requirements of the NCCLS broth microdilution method
(20). Disk diffusion was performed as above with different
lots of disks and plates than those used for generating the
interpretative criteria. Results of combined disk diffusion zones were
interpreted according to the criteria developed in this study to
evaluate the accuracy of the method.
Statistical methods.
Regression analysis of scatterplots was
done by the least-squares method, and correlation coefficients
(r) were calculated for MICs versus MICs, MICs versus zone
diameters, and MICs versus sums of zone diameters (13). MICs
were calculated from zone diameters and sums of zone diameters with the
BIOMIC system (Giles Scientific Inc., New York, N.Y.) algorithm
(3). The method of summing zone diameters from several disks
has been used in prior studies and provides greater precision in MIC
prediction (13). The ratios of these calculated MICs to the
mean MICs by the three methods and the ratios of the MICs by the three
methods to each other were determined. When the MICs by the two methods were identical, the ratio was 1; when the calculated MIC was greater than the reference method MIC, the ratio was greater than 1; and when
the calculated MIC was less than the reference method MIC, the ratio
was less than 1. When a reference MIC was less than or equal to the
minimum concentration tested, the minimum value was used for
calculating the ratio. There were no values greater than the maximum
concentration for the MIC methods. The two methods were considered to
be essentially in agreement when the ratios ranged from 0.5 to 2.0, i.e., within 1 doubling dilution.
With NCCLS-recommended interpretive criteria for penicillin (i.e.,
0.06 µg/ml, susceptible; 0.12 to 1 µg/ml, intermediate; and
2
µg/ml, resistant) (22), discrepancy rates were calculated according to minor, major, and very major error criteria
(24). A minor error is a one-category difference between the
methods (e.g., susceptible versus intermediate or intermediate versus resistant). A major error is indicated when the reference result is
susceptible and the comparative result is resistant. A very major error
is indicated when the reference result is resistant and the comparative
result is susceptible.
 |
RESULTS |
The results of the three reference MIC methods are shown as the
MICs at which 50% of the isolates are inhibited (MIC50s)
and MIC90s in Table 1. These
values show excellent agreement between the three MIC methods. The
percentages of isolates according to penicillin category by the agar
dilution method were 32.8% susceptible (Pens), 36.1%
intermediate (Peni), and 31.1% resistant
(Penr). In comparison, microdilution showed 37.3% to be
Pens, 33.9% to be Peni, and 28.4% to be
Penr, while the E-test showed 27.9% to be
Pens, 42.6% to be Peni, and 29.5% to be
Penr. The results of the three MIC methods were compared by
regression plots, comparisons of MIC ratios, and categorical error
rates. This analysis showed that the E-test and agar dilution results were closest, with a 99.5% essential agreement rate; no major or very
major category discrepancies; 7.7% minor discrepancies; and a
correlation coefficient (r) of 0.99. The correlation of agar
dilution versus microdilution and E-test versus microdilution was
slightly lower (95.1% essential agreement, r = 0.98 for both), with 9.9 and 13.3% minor errors, respectively; no
major or very major category discrepancies were present. As the three
MIC methods were in such close agreement, their geometric mean MICs
(referred to as mean reference MICs) were determined and used for
correlation with disk diffusion results.
Regression analyses of individual zone diameters and the sum of zone
diameters of various combinations of the oxacillin, methicillin, and
penicillin disks against mean reference MICs were performed. These
scatterplots are depicted in Fig. 1 and
2, and essential agreement rates,
correlation coefficients, and error rates are shown in Table
2. The individual disk correlation
coefficients were 0.84, 0.92, and 0.93 for oxacillin, methicillin, and
penicillin, respectively. Essential agreement scores of MICs calculated
from individual oxacillin and methicillin disks were 79% and 87%,
respectively. The penicillin disk, however, had the best essential
agreement of the single disks (93%), although the MIC ratios for only
54% of the strains were 1. The oxacillin and methicillin disks did not
differentiate Peni from Penr strains, and
penicillin disks showed considerable overlap between categories.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Regression lines of penicillin, methicillin, and
oxacillin disk zones plotted against mean reference MICs. Diagonal
dotted lines on either side of regression lines indicate 1 doubling-dilution variation. Zone diameter breakpoints corresponding to
penicillin MIC breakpoints are shown as vertical lines.
|
|

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Regression lines of combination disk zones plotted
against mean reference MICs. Diagonal dotted lines on either side of
regression lines indicate 1 doubling-dilution variation. Zone diameter
breakpoints corresponding to penicillin MIC breakpoints are shown as
vertical lines. The second x axis shows calculated
penicillin MICs corresponding to the zone diameter sum values of the
first x axis.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 2.
Comparison of MIC ratios of MICs, calculated from zone
diameter measurements and mean reference MICs, and categorical
error ratesa
|
|
The sum of the oxacillin, methicillin, and penicillin disks and the sum
of the methicillin and penicillin disks produced better agreement with
mean reference MICs than did the single disks. The correlation
coefficient was 0.97 for both disk combinations, and essential
agreement between MICs calculated by the three-disk procedure
(oxacillin, methicillin, and penicillin) with the mean reference MICs
was 98.4%, and that between MICs calculated by the two-disk procedure
(methicillin and penicillin) was 98.9%. In addition, MIC ratios of 1 were obtained for 76% of strains by the three-disk method and for 81%
by the two-disk method.
Analysis of discrepancies in Pens, Peni, and
Penr categories between calculated MICs and mean reference
MICs showed all discrepancies to be minor, with most being within 1 doubling dilution of a breakpoint. The fewest discrepancies
occurred with the three-disk, two-disk, and methicillin disk
procedures, with values similar to those obtained by the various MIC
methods. Oxacillin discrepancies were substantially higher (27.9%),
even when discrepancies within 1 dilution of breakpoints were excluded
(11.5%).
Further analysis of oxacillin disk and individual MIC method data with
the NCCLS oxacillin zone interpretations of
20 mm as Pens
and
19 mm as Peni or Penr showed agreement
for 181 of the 183 strains (98.9%) with E-test categories; the MICs
for the discrepant strains were 0.06 and 0.12 µg/ml. Oxacillin zones
were in agreement with agar dilution categories for 173 strains
(94.5%); the MICs for the discrepant strains were 0.06 µg/ml (9 strains) and 0.12 µg/ml (1 strain). Agreement with microdilution
category occurred for 164 strains (89.6%); the MICs for the discrepant
strains were 0.03 µg/ml (1 strain), 0.06 µg/ml (17 strains), and
0.12 µg/ml (1 strain).
The MICs that can be calculated from the two- and three-disk
combination procedures include a wide range (from 0.004 to 16 µg/ml),
assuring that all currently encountered susceptible, intermediate, and
resistant strains can be differentiated (Fig. 2). This is not the case
with the single-disk oxacillin procedure, which is unable to
differentiate strains for which MICs are 1.1 µg/ml from strains for
which MICs are higher (Fig. 1). Similarly, the highest MIC predicted by
the methicillin disk is 2.5 µg/ml. A wide range of MIC results can be
calculated with the penicillin disk (0.012 to 48 µg/ml); however, the
intermediate range (from 19 to 35 mm) has a 5% minor error rate, with
both susceptible and resistant organisms in this range.
Validation of the data generated by this study with 60 recently
isolated strains (20 Pens, 20 Peni, and 20 Penr) showed essential agreement rates of 95.0% for the
three-disk procedure and 96.7% for the two-disk procedure (Table
3). Calculated penicillin MICs were
correctly categorized for all Pens and Penr
strains. Of the 20 Peni strains, 18 were correctly
categorized by the three-disk method and 19 were correctly categorized
by the two-disk method; calculated MICs for the misclassified strains
were 1.1 to 1.3 µg/ml, while reference MICs for these two strains
were 1.0 µg/ml.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 3.
Comparison of MIC ratios of MICs calculated from sums of
zone diameters with microdilution MICs for 60 strains
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Resistance of S. pneumoniae to agents other than
-lactams is usually high level, and strains therefore have bimodal
distributions to these agents, with few (if any) intermediate strains
(16, 18).
-Lactam resistance, on the other hand, results
from multiple changes to one or more penicillin-binding proteins in
strains for which penicillin MICs are 0.06 µg/ml to as high as 64 µg/ml, depending on the number of changes and the affinities of the
penicillin-binding proteins (9). Disk diffusion has been
shown to be an accurate method for obtaining categorical susceptibility
results with S. pneumoniae for many non-
-lactams,
including erythromycin, clindamycin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole,
tetracycline, and chloramphenicol (7, 11, 17, 22).
Prior to this study, the use of disk diffusion for
-lactams has been
limited to screening for penicillin susceptibility with 1-µg
oxacillin disks (14, 21, 24). In addition, the use of the
oxacillin disk is limited by the fact that strains for which penicillin
MICs are 0.06 µg/ml, the upper limit of the susceptible category,
usually have oxacillin zones of
19 mm (14, 16-18). This occurs more frequently when MICs are determined by
microdilution, which was the case in this study, in which 17 such discrepancies occurred with microdilution MICs, compared to 9 with agar dilution, and 1 with the E-test. Although this limits
the value of the oxacillin disk as a screening method, in the
current study most of the discrepant Pens strains had
oxacillin zones of 11 to 19 mm, while most Peni strains had
zones of
10 mm.
This study has shown that the standard NCCLS disk diffusion method for
testing S. pneumoniae can be adapted to provide accurate MICs and qualitative category (Pens, Peni, and
Penr) results for penicillin that are comparable to E-test,
agar dilution, and microdilution MIC methods. By summing zone diameter
measurements from either three (penicillin, oxacillin, and methicillin)
or two (penicillin and methicillin) disks, accurate MIC results can be
determined from regression plots at a considerably lower cost than that
for any MIC method that is currently available. The best results
were obtained with the sum of the three zone diameters from standard
penicillin, methicillin, and oxacillin disks. The sum of two disks also
provided excellent results, with only minimally more minor
category discrepancies than with the three disks. In fact, the
essential agreement rates of 98.4% for MICs determined by the
three-disk procedure and 98.9% for MICs determined by the two-disk
procedure were higher than the essential agreement rate of 95.1% for
MICs obtained by microdilution versus agar dilution and microdilution
versus E-test. MICs can be determined manually from regression plots or
generated electronically with the BIOMIC system programmed to perform
these conversions (3, 19).
The validation of the two- and three-disk procedures performed as part
of this study confirmed the accuracy of these methods for determining
penicillin MICs. Essential agreement rates for penicillin (95.0 and
96.7%) were similar to those found with several commercially available
systems (91.3 to 100%) which have been approved for use in diagnostic
laboratories (25). The few categorical errors found in the
validation study were minor, and the frequency of these minor errors
was similar to or lower than recently published values (25).
In summary, this study has demonstrated the value of disk diffusion in
accurately and economically determining the penicillin susceptibility
of S. pneumoniae at both a categorical level and a
calculated MIC. This approach may have additional applications with
other
-lactams.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We acknowledge the interest of Ronald N. Jones in this work, the
support of David Gibbs for the data analysis, and the editorial assistance of Laura Koeth in manuscript preparation.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Pathology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, 11100 Euclid Ave.,
Cleveland, OH 44106. Phone: (216) 844-3484. Fax: (216) 844-5601.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Appelbaum, P. C.
1992.
Antimicrobial resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae: an overview.
Clin. Infect. Dis.
15:77-83[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Block, S. L.,
C. J. Harrison,
J. A. Hedrick, et al.
1995.
Penicillin resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in acute otitis media: risk factors, susceptibility patterns and antimicrobial management.
Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J.
14:751-759[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
D'Amato, R. F.,
L. Hochstein,
J. R. Vernaleo,
D. J. Cleri,
A. A. Wallman,
M. S. Gradus, and C. Thornsberry.
1985.
Evaluation of the BIOGRAM antimicrobial susceptibility test system.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
22:793-798[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
D'Amato, R. F.,
J. A. Swenson,
G. A. McKinley, et al.
1987.
Quantitative antimicrobial susceptibility test for Streptococcus pneumoniae using inoculum supplemented with whole defibrinated sheep blood.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
25:1753-1756[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Dixon, J. M. S.,
A. E. Lipsinski, and M. E. P. Graham.
1977.
Detection and prevalence of pneumococci with increased resistance to penicillin.
Can. Med. Assoc. J.
117:1159-1161[Abstract].
|
| 6.
|
Doern, G. V.,
A. Bruggemann,
H. P. Holley, Jr., and A. M. Rauch.
1996.
Antimicrobial resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae recovered from outpatients in the United States during the winter months of 1994 to 1995: results of a 30-center national surveillance study.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
40:1208-1213[Abstract].
|
| 7.
|
Fasola, E. L.,
S. Bajaksouzian,
P. C. Appelbaum, and M. R. Jacobs.
1997.
Variation in erythromycin and clindamycin susceptibilities of Streptococcus pneumoniae by four test methods.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
41:129-134[Abstract].
|
| 8.
|
Hansman, D., and M. M. Bullen.
1967.
A resistant pneumococcus.
Lancet
ii:264-265.
|
| 9.
|
Jabes, D.,
S. Nachman, and A. Tomasz.
1989.
Penicillin-binding protein families: evidence for the clonal nature of penicillin resistance in clinical isolates of pneumococci.
J. Infect. Dis.
159:16-25[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Jacobs, M. R.,
H. J. Koornhof,
R. M. Robins-Browne,
C. M. Stevenson,
Z. A. Vermaak,
I. Freiman,
G. B. Miller, and R. Austrian.
1978.
Emergence of multiply resistant pneumococci.
N. Engl. J. Med.
299:735-740[Abstract].
|
| 11.
|
Jacobs, M. R.,
Y. Mithal,
R. M. Robins-Browne,
M. N. Gaspar, and H. J. Koornhof.
1979.
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of pneumococci: determination of Kirby-Bauer breakpoints for penicillin G, erythromycin, clindamycin, tetracycline, chloramphenicol, and rifampin.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
16:190-197[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Jacobs, M. R.,
M. N. Gaspar,
R. M. Robins-Browne, and H. J. Koornhof.
1980.
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of pneumococci. Determination of optimal disc diffusion test for detection of penicillin G resistance.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
6:53-64[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Jacobs, M. R.,
J. F. Tomashefski, Jr.,
A. Franco, and P. Anton.
1981.
Penicillin susceptibility testing of gonococci by disc diffusion.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
7:319-330[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Jacobs, M. R.
1992.
Treatment and diagnosis of infections caused by drug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae.
Clin. Infect. Dis.
15:119-127[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Jacobs, M. R.,
S. Bajaksouzian,
P. C. Appelbaum, and A. Bolmstrom.
1992.
Evaluation of the E-test for susceptibility testing of pneumococci.
Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.
15:473-478[Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Jacobs, M. R., and P. C. Appelbaum.
1995.
Antibiotic-resistant pneumococci.
Rev. Med. Micro.
6:77-93.
|
| 17.
|
Jorgensen, J. H.,
J. M. Swenson,
F. C. Tenover,
M. J. Ferraro,
J. A. Hindler, and P. R. Murray.
1994.
Development of interpretive criteria and quality control limits for broth microdilution and disk diffusion antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Streptococcus pneumoniae.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
32:2448-2459[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Klugman, K. P.
1990.
Pneumococcal resistance to antibiotics.
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
3:171-196[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Korgenski, E. K., and J. A. Daly.
1995.
Evaluation of the BIOMIC Video Reader System, abstr. C-337.
In
Abstracts of the 95th General Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology 1995. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
|
| 20.
|
National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards.
1993.
Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically. Approved standard M7-A3.
National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Villanova, Pa.
|
| 21.
|
National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards.
1993.
Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility tests. Approved standard M2-A5.
National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Villanova, Pa.
|
| 22.
|
National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards.
1995.
Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing: sixth informational supplement. M100-S6.
National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Villanova, Pa.
|
| 23.
|
Spika, J. S.,
R. R. Facklam,
B. D. Plikaytis,
M. J. Oxtoby, and the Pneumococcal Surveillance Working Group.
1991.
Antimicrobial resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae in the United States, 1979-1987.
J. Infect. Dis.
163:1273-1278[Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Swenson, J. M.,
B. C. Hill, and C. Thornsberry.
1986.
Screening pneumococci for penicillin resistance.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
24:749-752[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Tenover, F. C.,
C. N. Baker, and J. M. Swenson.
1996.
Evaluation of commercial methods for determining antimicrobial susceptibility of Streptococcus pneumoniae.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
34:10-14[Abstract].
|
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, January 1998, p. 179-183, Vol. 36, No. 1
0095-1137/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Tenover, F. C., Mohammed, M. J., Stelling, J., O'Brien, T., Williams, R.
(2001). Ability of Laboratories To Detect Emerging Antimicrobial Resistance: Proficiency Testing and Quality Control Results from the World Health Organization's External Quality Assurance System for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. J. Clin. Microbiol.
39: 241-250
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Rowe, A. K., Schwartz, B., Wasas, A., Klugman, K. P.
(2000). Evaluation of the Etest as a means of determining the antibiotic susceptibilities of isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae from children in the Central African Republic. J Antimicrob Chemother
45: 132-133
[Full Text]