This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rohner, P.
Right arrow Articles by Pfyffer, G. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rohner, P.
Right arrow Articles by Pfyffer, G. E.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, October 1998, p. 3046-3047, Vol. 36, No. 10
0095-1137/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Rapid Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis with the LCx Mycobacterium tuberculosis Assay and Comparison with Conventional Diagnostic Techniques

Peter Rohner,1,* Esther I. M. Jahn,2 Beatrice Ninet,1 Concetta Ionati,1 Rainer Weber,3 Raymond Auckenthaler,1 and Gaby E. Pfyffer2

Infectious Disease Division, Bacteriology Laboratory, University Hospital Geneva, 1211 Geneva,1 Swiss National Center for Mycobacteria, Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Zurich, 8028 Zurich,2 and Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital, 8091 Zurich,3 Switzerland

Received 16 December 1997/Returned for modification 9 March 1998/Accepted 2 July 1998

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

The LCx MTB amplification assay is a nucleic acid amplification test intended for the direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in respiratory specimens. We evaluated its performance on 2,001 consecutive respiratory specimens; 78 were culture positive for M. tuberculosis. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of this assay for all specimens compared to culture results were 88.5, 97.7, 60.5, and 99.5%, respectively. When referred to resolved clinical diagnosis of active tuberculosis, these values improved to 90.2, 98.4, 72.8, and 99.5%, respectively.

    TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

Nucleic acid amplification tests have contributed to a more rapid and reliable diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis. Two of these methods, based on transcription-mediated amplification (Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct Test MTD; Gen-Probe, San Diego, Calif.) and on PCR (Amplicor M. tuberculosis; Roche Diagnostic Systems, Somerville, N.J.) were approved in 1996 by the Food and Drug Administration for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in smear-positive respiratory specimens in conjunction with culture for untreated patients (2). Another amplification assay, the LCx MTB (Abbott Diagnostics Division, Abbott Park, Ill.) uses the ligase chain reaction to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex directly in respiratory specimens. We prospectively evaluated its performance on consecutive, nonselected specimens.

A total of 2,001 clinical specimens (1,108 sputum, 540 bronchial aspirate, 320 bronchoalveolar lavage, 21 gastric fluid, and 12 tracheal aspirate specimens) obtained from 1,130 patients were analyzed by two clinical mycobacteriology laboratories. Smear samples were stained with fluorochrome dye. At site A (Geneva, Switzerland), specimens were digested and decontaminated with the 4% sodium hydroxide method (7, 10) before inoculating BACTEC 12B vials (Becton Dickinson, Sparks, Md.) and Coletsos (BioMérieux, Lyon, France) and Stonebrink egg-based slants (Becton Dickinson). All media were incubated at 36°C for 14 weeks. At site B (Zurich, Switzerland), the NALC-NaOH procedure (7, 8) was used and one BACTEC 12B vial, one Löwenstein-Jensen slant, and one Middlebrook 7H10/sel 7H11 agar (bi-plate; Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems, Cockeysville, Md.) were inoculated per specimen. BACTEC 12B vials were incubated at 36°C for 8 weeks, and solid media were incubated at 36°C for 9 weeks. The LCx MTB assay, which consists three main steps (specimen preparation, amplification, and detection), was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions (1, 6). The remaining volumes of the decontaminated samples were frozen at -20°C so that the LCx assay could be repeated for specimens yielding discrepant results by LCx assay and culture. For LCx MTB-positive specimens which remained culture negative, patient charts were reviewed or the treating physician was questioned as to whether clinical evidence of active pulmonary tuberculosis existed for these patients. Specimens which were LCx MTB positive but culture negative and which originated from patients with strong clinical evidence of tuberculosis were considered true positive in the resolved results.

From 117 (5.8%) of the 2,001 specimens, mycobacteria were cultured, 78 (3.9%) were identified as M. tuberculosis and 39 were identified as nontuberculous mycobacteria. Acid-fast bacilli could be detected by microscopy in 68 (3.4%) specimens. Of the 78 specimens from which M. tuberculosis could be cultured, 58 (74.4%) were smear positive. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the LCx MTB assay for all specimens as well as for smear-positive and smear-negative specimens are given in Table 1. Table 2 shows the performance of the LCx MTB assay compared to clinical evidence of active pulmonary tuberculosis. Fourteen samples collected from patients with pulmonary tuberculosis were microscopy and culture negative; five of these patients had received antituberculous treatment when the samples were collected. Table 3 summarizes the results obtained for specimens with initially discrepant results between LCx MTB assay and culture compared to the results of the repeated LCx test.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1.   Comparison of LCx MTB results with culture results for the detection of M. tuberculosis complex

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2.   Comparison of LCx MTB and microscopic results with resolved results for the clinical diagnosis of tuberculosis

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3.   Initial and repeat results of the LCx MTB test obtained for specimens with initially discrepant resultsa

The results achieved with the LCx MTB assay on respiratory specimens pretreated with either the NaOH or NALC-NaOH method are similar and comparable to those obtained for the MTD and Amplicor M. tuberculosis nucleic acid amplification assays (4). Other evaluations of the LCx MTB assay have been published recently (1, 6, 12). These studies were performed on selected specimens in order to include a large number of specimens containing species of the M. tuberculosis complex. With selected specimens, high positivity rates ranging from 16 to 33% were obtained. Sensitivities, specificities, and NPVs were comparable in all LCx MTB evaluations (>88%), but the PPV was relatively low in one evaluation (70.0%) (6), which was close to the value we obtained (60.5%). The reason for this observation in the current study was the large number of culture-negative specimens (n = 1,923), which is generally observed when analyzing nonselected samples. As reported for other nucleic acid amplification tests (1, 2, 4, 6, 11, 12), higher sensitivity was achieved with the LCx MTB assay on smear-positive specimens than on smear-negative specimens, i.e., 94.8 versus 70.0%, respectively (Table 1).

In our study, 14 specimens were obtained from patients with clinical evidence of tuberculosis and with LCx MTB assay-positive but culture-negative results. Culture media may not reveal all specimens containing M. tuberculosis. In this study, the BACTEC 12B medium alone detected 75 (96.7%) of the 78 M. tuberculosis strains as the most sensitive medium used in both participating laboratories. "False-positive" nucleic acid amplification test results have been reported for patients receiving adequate antituberculous treatment with residual M. tuberculosis detectable with nucleic acid amplification assays in their respiratory specimens collected up to 6 months after the onset of treatment (3, 9). In the present study, five specimens were collected from patients receiving antituberculous treatment which were LCx MTB positive but microscopy and culture negative. False-positive results have also been reported for specimens collected with sterilized bronchoscopes which may be contaminated with residual M. tuberculosis (5). In the current study, a relatively large number of bronchoalveolar lavage specimens (n = 320) was included. Of these specimens, only two gave false positive results by the LCx MTB assay, which is negligible compared to the total number of 31 false-positive LCx results.

Commercially available automated amplification assays have advantages over in-house techniques, since automation reduces variations during the technical procedure and large-scale production of reagents limits lot-to-lot variations and interlaboratory differences. In addition, external quality control data from different testing sites allow an objective validation of the performance of a test system as well as comparisons of the results. The main advantage of the LCx MTB test over other currently available nucleic acid amplification tests is the automated microparticle enzyme immunoassay detection of the amplified product with the LCx analyzer. Cost awareness is becoming an important issue in the management of diagnostic laboratories. The frequency of testing largely influences the cost efficiency of these tests. Testing once weekly allows batching and economic advantages, but the impact on patient care and the benefit of rapid testing are reduced. Therefore, such tests should be run at least twice weekly (11). Laboratories processing large numbers of specimens may need several instruments, since a maximum of 20 specimens can be processed per LCx MTB run.

    FOOTNOTES

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Division des Maladies Infectieuses, Laboratoire Central de Bactériologie, Hôpital Cantonal de Genève, 24 Rue Micheli-du-Crest, 1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland. Phone: 41 22 37 27 313. Fax: 41 22 37 27 304. E-mail: Peter.Rohner{at}hcuge.ch.

    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Text
References

1. Ausina, A., F. Gamboa, E. Gazapo, J. M. Manterola, J. Lonca, L. Matas, J. R. Manzano, C. Rodrigo, P. J. Cardona, and E. Padilla. 1997. Evaluation of the semiautomated Abbott LCx Mycobacterium tuberculosis assay for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in respiratory specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:1996-2002[Abstract].
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 1996. Nucleic acid amplification tests for tuberculosis. Morbid. Mortal. Weekly Rep. 45:950-952[Medline].
3. Hellyer, T. J., T. W. Fletcher, J. H. Bates, W. W. Stead, G. L. Templeton, M. D. Cave, and K. D. Eisenach. 1996. Strand displacement amplification and the polymerase chain reaction for monitoring response to treatment in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. J. Infect. Dis. 173:934-941[Medline].
4. Ieven, M., and H. Goossens. 1997. Relevance of nucleic acid amplification techniques for diagnosis of respiratory tract infections in the clinical laboratory. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 10:242-256[Abstract].
5. Kaul, K., S. Luke, C. McGurn, N. Snowden, C. Monti, and W. A. Fry. 1996. Amplification of residual DNA sequences in sterile bronchoscopes leading to false-positive PCR results. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:1949-1951[Abstract].
6. Lindbraten, A., P. Gaustad, B. Hovig, and T. Tonjum. 1997. Direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in clinical samples from patients in Norway by ligase chain reaction. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:3248-3253[Abstract].
7. Nolte, F. S., and B. Metchock. 1995. Mycobacterium, p. 400-437. In P. R. Murray, E. J. Baron, M. A. Pfaller, F. C. Tenover, and R. H. Yolken (ed.), Manual of clinical microbiology, 6th ed. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
8. Pfyffer, G. E., C. Cieslak, H. M. Welscher, P. Kissling, and S. Rüsch-Gerdes. 1997. Rapid detection of mycobacteria in clinical specimens by using the automated BACTEC 9000 MB system and comparison with radiometric and solid-culture systems. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:2229-2234[Abstract].
9. Pfyffer, G. E., P. Kissling, R. Wirth, and R. Weber. 1994. Direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in respiratory specimens by a target-amplified test system. J. Clin. Microbiol. 32:918-923[Abstract/Free Full Text].
10. Rohner, P., B. Ninet, C. Metral, S. Emler, and R. Auckenthaler. 1997. Evaluation of the MB/BacT system and comparison to the BACTEC 460 system and solid media for isolation of mycobacteria from clinical specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:3127-3131[Abstract].
11. Salfinger, M., J. Sbarbaro, N. W. Schluger, M. F. Sierra, and G. L. Woods. 1997. Rapid diagnostic tests for tuberculosis. What is the appropriate use? Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 155:1804-1814[Abstract].
12. Tortoli, E., F. Lavinia, and M. T. Simonetti. 1997. Evaluation of a commercial ligase chain reaction kit (Abbott LCx) for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in pulmonary and extrapulmonary specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:2424-2426[Abstract].


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, October 1998, p. 3046-3047, Vol. 36, No. 10
0095-1137/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Greco, S, Girardi, E, Navarra, A, Saltini, C (2006). Current evidence on diagnostic accuracy of commercially based nucleic acid amplification tests for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis. Thorax 61: 783-790 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Danes, C., Gonzalez-Martin, J., Pumarola, T., Rano, A., Benito, N., Torres, A., Moreno, A., Rovira, M., Puig de la Bellacasa, J. (2002). Pulmonary Infiltrates in Immunosuppressed Patients: Analysis of a Diagnostic Protocol. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40: 2134-2140 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Lumb, R., Davies, K., Dawson, D., Gibb, R., Gottlieb, T., Kershaw, C., Kociuba, K., Nimmo, G., Sangster, N., Worthington, M., Bastian, I. (1999). Multicenter Evaluation of the Abbott LCx Mycobacterium tuberculosis Ligase Chain Reaction Assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37: 3102-3107 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rohner, P.
Right arrow Articles by Pfyffer, G. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rohner, P.
Right arrow Articles by Pfyffer, G. E.