Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, October 1998, p. 3077-3078, Vol. 36, No. 10
0095-1137/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Genotyping of Chlamydia trachomatis in
Urine Specimens Will Facilitate Large Epidemiological Studies
Servaas A.
Morré,1
Robert
Moes,1
Irene
Van
Valkengoed,2
Joan P.
Boeke,2
Jacques T. M.
van Eijk,2
Chris J. L. M.
Meijer,1 and
Adriaan J. C.
Van den
Brule1,*
Section of Molecular Pathology, Department of
Pathology, University Hospital Vrije Universiteit, 1081 HV,1 and
Institute for Research in
Extramural Medicine, Vrije Universiteit, 1081 BT,2 Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Received 3 April 1998/Returned for modification 9 June
1998/Accepted 17 July 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
The serovars of Chlamydia trachomatis-positive urine
specimens (n = 81; as detected by PCR and ligase chain
reaction) were successfully analyzed in 94% of cases by
omp1 PCR-based RFLP analysis. The use of urine specimens
and this simple and sensitive typing method will greatly facilitate
epidemiological studies of C. trachomatis serovar
distribution in asymptomatic C. trachomatis infections in
both females and males.
 |
TEXT |
The species Chlamydia
trachomatis comprises 15 serovars, serovars A to L and additional
variants. Serotyping of these C. trachomatis isolates is
performed on cell cultures of cervical and urethral specimens by using
polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies (13). Recent studies
showed the feasibility of typing clinical isolates (5, 14)
and direct typing of cervical specimens (8, 9) by a nested
omp1 PCR-based restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) assay for the differentiation of isolates into serovars and
genovariants (12). By a nested PCR assay, 0.01 inclusion-forming unit (IFU) of serovar L2 DNA could be typed in
reconstruction experiments (8). Nowadays, urine specimens
are more frequently used for the detection of C. trachomatis
in both males and females by nucleic acid amplification assays (LCx,
COBAS, NASBA, and AMP-CT [2, 6, 7, 10, 11]). This
noninvasive technique has a sensitivity higher than that of cell
culture of tissue from the urethra and the cervix (6) and a
sensitivity comparable to that of C. trachomatis detection
in cervical scrape specimens by amplification assays. The use of urine
specimens facilitates the screening of asymptomatically infected males
and females. Typing asymptomatic C. trachomatis infections
in urine specimens would enable the performance of large
epidemiological typing studies. However, urine specimens cannot be used
for serotyping purposes since cell culture using urine specimens is
impossible. Also PCR-based genotyping directly on urine (e.g., 10 or 20 µl) will result in the introduction of urinary inhibitors which
negatively influence C. trachomatis amplification.
Furthermore, commercial assays (LCx [Abbott Laboratories, Chicago,
Ill.] and COBAS Amplicor [Roche Diagnostic Systems, Inc., Branchburg,
N.J.]) are more frequently used in routine laboratories for detection
of C. trachomatis in clinical specimens and generate buffer
sample solutions of which the composition, which is not exactly known,
inhibits the PCR in the PCR-based RFLP genotyping. Therefore, the aim
of this study was to develop a simple and sensitive method for the
typing of C. trachomatis serovars in urine specimens.
Firstly, the DNA isolation procedure for urine specimens had to be
optimized, and secondly, C. trachomatis typing using the
purified DNA had to be evaluated.
To optimize the genotyping of C. trachomatis from urine
specimens, different DNA isolation methods were compared. For this, a
dilution series of serovar L2 (range, 101 to
10
3 IFU) in the background of a C. trachomatis-negative urine specimen (as determined by PCR and
ligase chain reaction) was used to determine the sensitivities of a
silica-based DNA isolation method (1) and a filter
tube-based isolation method (High Pure PCR Template Preparation
[HPPTP] kit; Boehringer Mannheim B.V., Almere, The Netherlands) by
amplifying the plasmid target (11) and the omp1 gene (9, 12). In addition, pellets from 1, 3, and 5 ml of five C. trachomatis-positive urine specimens (as determined
by PCR and ligase chain reaction) were analyzed in the two different DNA isolations. Purified DNAs were subjected to a nested
omp1 PCR (1.1 kb) as previously described (9),
after which the PCR product was used for RFLP analysis (12).
In the comparison of the silica-based DNA isolation method with the
HPPTP method, the latter not only was 10 times more sensitive (0.1 versus 0.01 IFU) for both the C. trachomatis plasmid target
and the omp1 target but also proved to be faster (30 versus
60 min) and easier to perform as well. For the five C. trachomatis-positive urine specimens, an input of 5 ml of urine
gave the strongest amplification signals.
Subsequently, C. trachomatis-positive urine specimens
(n = 81), obtained from asymptomatically infected men
and women during a screening program in Amsterdam, The Netherlands,
were used for genotyping. Urine pellets were used to isolate DNA by the
HPPTP method. Serovars could be determined for 76 samples by a
PCR-based RFLP method. The serovar distribution is shown in Table
1. Serovars F, E, and D (D and
D
) were the most prevalent C. trachomatis
serovars in asymptomatic infected females and males. Furthermore, two
C. trachomatis variants were found to have unknown RFLP
patterns which were not due to double infections. Variants have been
found in other studies, but in those studies cervical specimens were
used (12). The obtained typing data are in agreement with
those of other typing studies using cervical and urethral swabs
(15, 16). For the urine specimens in which omp1
amplification and typing were not possible (n = 5),
inhibition in three eluates (urine specimens from two females and one
male) was shown by means of spiking of serovar L2 DNA in the HPPTP
eluates and subsequent plasmid PCR. In the two remaining urine
specimens, partial inhibition could be the reason for the inability to
amplify the longer omp1 fragment. This is still a subject of
further investigation.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1.
Serovar distribution as found for C. trachomatis-positive urine specimens from asymptomatic
infected patients
|
|
Since nowadays commercial assays (LCx and COBAS Amplicor) are
increasingly used in routine laboratories for C. trachomatis detection in cervical or urethral and urine specimens, the HPPTP kit
was also optimized for DNA isolation from the buffer sample solutions
since PCR could not directly be applied to buffer sample solutions.
From the LCx and COBAS Amplicor sample buffer solutions, 300 and
500 µl, respectively, were mixed with 1 volume of isopropanol and
centrifuged for 10 min at 14,000 rpm. The supernatant was removed, and
the obtained pellet was resuspended in 200 µl of phosphate-buffered
saline. Subsequently, the HPPTP protocol was followed for DNA isolation
and C. trachomatis serovars were determined by the PCR-based
RFLP method. From the C. trachomatis-positive urine
specimens, 80 corresponding sample buffer solutions (40 each from the
LCx and Amplicor assays) were used for typing. Serovars identical to
those found by DNA isolation directly from the urine specimens were
found. For one LCx mixture and three Amplicor mixtures obtained from
different urine specimens the subsequent omp1 amplification was not successful and the mixtures could therefore not be typed. All
samples (urines and sample buffer solutions) in which omp1 amplification and subsequent RFLP typing were not successful were noncorresponding samples.
In this study it was shown that C. trachomatis typing,
despite inhibition in a small number of the samples, could be
successfully performed for 94% of the urines. C. trachomatis typing of 95% (4 of 80) of the buffer-urine solutions
from the commercial assays was also possible. Preliminary results
showed that identical serovars were found in urines and the
corresponding cervical scrapes (n = 24), supporting the
feasibility of urine for C. trachomatis typing. The typing
of C. trachomatis serovars in routine collected material
(urine specimens and buffer-resuspended clinical material) provides the
opportunity to study the epidemiology of C. trachomatis serovars and genovariants in an asymptomatically infected population (3, 4, 15).
In conclusion, the use of urine specimens in combination with this
simple and sensitive C. trachomatis typing method will greatly facilitate epidemiological studies of C. trachomatis
serovars in both asymptomatically and symptomatically infected females and males.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Section of
Molecular Pathology, Department of Pathology, University Hospital Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Phone: 31-20-4440503 or 31-20-44023. Fax: 31-20-4442964. E-mail: vandenbrule{at}azvu.nl.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Boom, R.,
C. L. M. Sol,
M. M. M. Salimans,
C. L. Jansen,
P. M. E. Wertheim-van Dillen, and J. van der Noordaa.
1990.
Rapid and simple method for purification of nucleic acids.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
28:495-503[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Crotchfelt, K. A.,
B. Pare,
C. Gaydos, and T. C. Quinn.
1998.
Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by the Gen-Probe AMPLIFIED Chlamydia Trachomatis Assay (AMP CT) in urine specimens from men and women and endocervical specimens from women.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
36:391-394[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Dean, D., and K. Millman.
1997.
Molecular and mutation trends analyses of omp1 alleles for serovar E of Chlamydia trachomatis.
J. Clin. Investig.
99:475-483[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Dean, D.,
E. Oudens,
G. Bolan,
N. Padian, and J. Schachter.
1995.
Major membrane variants of Chlamydia trachomatis are associated with severe upper genital tract infections and histopathology in San Francisco.
J. Infect. Dis.
172:1013-1022[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Frost, E. H.,
S. Deslandes,
S. Veilleux, and D. Bourgaux-Ramoisy.
1991.
Typing Chlamydia trachomatis by detection of restriction fragment length polymorphism in the gene encoding the major outer membrane protein.
J. Infect. Dis.
163:1103-1107[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Goessens, W. H. F.,
J. W. Mouton,
W. J. van der Meijden,
S. Deelen,
T. H. van Rijsoort-Vos,
N. Lemmens-den Toom,
H. A. Verbrugh, and R. P. Verkooyen.
1997.
Comparison of three commercially available amplification assays, AMP CT, LCx, and COBAS AMPLICOR, for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in first-void urine.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
35:2628-2633[Abstract].
|
| 7.
|
Jaschek, G.,
C. A. Gaydos,
L. E. Welsh, and T. Quinn.
1993.
Direct detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens from symptomatic and asymptomatic men by using a rapid polymerase chain reaction assay.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
31:1209-1212[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Lan, J.,
J. M. M. Walboomers,
R. Roosendaal,
G. J. J van Doornum,
D. M. MacLaren,
C. J. L. M. Meijer, and A. J. C van den Brule.
1993.
Direct detection and genotyping of Chlamydia trachomatis in cervical scrapes by using polymerase chain reaction and restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
31:1060-1065[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Lan, J.,
J. M. Ossewaarde,
J. M. M. Walboomers,
C. J. L. M. Meijer, and A. J. C. van den Brule.
1994.
Improved PCR sensitivity for direct genotyping of Chlamydia trachomatis serovars by using a nested PCR.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
32:528-530[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Lee, H. H.,
M. A. Chernesky,
J. Schachter,
J. D. Burczak,
W. W. Andrews,
S. Muldoon,
G. Leckie, and W. E. Stamm.
1995.
Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis genitourinary infection in women by ligase chain reaction assay of urine.
Lancet
345:213-216[Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Morré, S. A.,
P. Sillekens,
M. V. Jacobs,
P. van Aarle,
S. de Blok,
B. van Gemen,
J. M. M. Walboomers,
C. J. L. M. Meijer, and A. J. C. van den Brule.
1996.
RNA amplification by nucleic acid sequence-based amplification with an internal standard enables reliable detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in cervical scrapings and urine samples.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
34:3108-3114[Abstract].
|
| 12.
|
Morré, S. A.,
J. M. Ossewaarde,
J. Lan,
G. J. J. van Doornum,
J. M. M. Walboomers,
D. M. MacLaren,
C. J. L. M. Meijer, and A. J. C. van den Brule.
1998.
Serotyping and genotyping of genital Chlamydia trachomatis isolates reveal variants of serovars Ba, G, and J as confirmed by omp1 nucleotide sequence analysis.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
36:345-351[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Ossewaarde, J. M.,
M. Rieffe,
A. de Vries,
R. P. Derksen-Nawrocki,
H. J. Hooft,
G. J. J. van Doornum, and A. M. van Loon.
1994.
Comparison of two panels of monoclonal antibodies for serovar determination of Chlamydia trachomatis.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
32:2968-2974[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Sayada, C.,
E. Danamur,
J. Orfila,
F. Catalan, and J. Elion.
1991.
Rapid genotyping of Chlamydia trachomatis major outer membrane protein by the polymerase chain reaction.
FEMS Microbiol. Lett.
83:73-78.
|
| 15.
|
Van de Laar, M. J. W.,
J. Lan,
Y. T. H. H. van Duynhoven,
J. S. A. Fennema,
J. M. Ossewaarde,
A. J. C. van den Brule,
G. J. J. van Doornum,
R. A. Coutinho, and J. A. R. van den Hoek.
1996.
Differences in clinical manifestations of genital chlamydial infections related to serovars.
Genitourin. Med.
72:261-265[Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Workowski, K. A.,
R. J. Suchland,
M. B. Pettinger, and W. E. Stamm.
1992.
Association of genital infections with specific chlamydia serovars and race.
J. Infect. Dis.
166:1445-1449[Medline].
|
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, October 1998, p. 3077-3078, Vol. 36, No. 10
0095-1137/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Xiong, L., Kong, F., Zhou, H., Gilbert, G. L.
(2006). Use of PCR and Reverse Line Blot Hybridization Assay for Rapid Simultaneous Detection and Serovar Identification of Chlamydia trachomatis. J. Clin. Microbiol.
44: 1413-1418
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Millman, K., Black, C. M., Johnson, R. E., Stamm, W. E., Jones, R. B., Hook, E. W., Martin, D. H., Bolan, G., Tavare, S., Dean, D.
(2004). Population-Based Genetic and Evolutionary Analysis of Chlamydia trachomatis Urogenital Strain Variation in the United States. J. Bacteriol.
186: 2457-2465
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ngandjio, A., Clerc, M., Fonkoua, M. C., Thonnon, J., Lunel, F., Bebear, C., Bianchi, A., de Barbeyrac, B.
(2004). Restriction endonuclease patterns of the omp1 gene of reference Chlamydia trachomatis strains and characterization of isolates from Cameroonian students. J Med Microbiol
53: 47-50
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Singh, V., Salhan, S., Das, B. C., Mittal, A.
(2003). Predominance of Chlamydia trachomatis Serovars Associated with Urogenital Infections in Females in New Delhi, India. J. Clin. Microbiol.
41: 2700-2702
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bandea, C I, Kubota, K, Brown, T M, Kilmarx, P H, Bhullar, V, Yanpaisarn, S, Chaisilwattana, P, Siriwasin, W, Black, C M
(2001). Typing of Chlamydia trachomatis strains from urine samples by amplification and sequencing the major outer membrane protein gene (omp1). Sex. Transm. Infect.
77: 419-422
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Jurstrand, M., Falk, L., Fredlund, H., Lindberg, M., Olcen, P., Andersson, S., Persson, K., Albert, J., Backman, A.
(2001). Characterization of Chlamydia trachomatis omp1 Genotypes among Sexually Transmitted Disease Patients in Sweden. J. Clin. Microbiol.
39: 3915-3919
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Pannekoek, Y., Westenberg, S. M., de Vries, J., Repping, S., Spanjaard, L., Eijk, P. P., van der Ende, A., Dankert, J.
(2000). PCR Assessment of Chlamydia trachomatis Infection of Semen Specimens Processed for Artificial Insemination. J. Clin. Microbiol.
38: 3763-3767
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Morré, S. A., Ossewaarde, J. M., Savelkoul, P. H. M., Stoof, J., Meijer, C. J. L. M., van den Brule, A. J. C.
(2000). Analysis of Genetic Heterogeneity in Chlamydia trachomatis Clinical Isolates of Serovars D, E, and F by Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism. J. Clin. Microbiol.
38: 3463-3466
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Morré, S. A., Rozendaal, L., van Valkengoed, I. G. M., Boeke, A. J. P., van Voorst Vader, P. C., Schirm, J., de Blok, S., van den Hoek, J. A. R., van Doornum, G. J. J., Meijer, C. J. L. M., van den Brule, A. J. C.
(2000). Urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis Serovars in Men and Women with a Symptomatic or Asymptomatic Infection: an Association with Clinical Manifestations?. J. Clin. Microbiol.
38: 2292-2296
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kjar, H O, Dimcevski, G, Hoff, G, Olesen, F, Ostergaard, L
(2000). Recurrence of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection evaluated by mailed samples obtained at home: 24 weeks' prospective follow up study. Sex. Transm. Infect.
76: 169-172
[Abstract]
[Full Text]