Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, November 1998, p. 3230-3233, Vol. 36, No. 11
0095-1137/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Performance of the Gen-Probe AMPLIFIED Chlamydia Trachomatis
Assay in Detecting Chlamydia trachomatis in Endocervical and
Urine Specimens from Women and Urethral and Urine Specimens
from Men Attending Sexually Transmitted Disease and Family
Planning Clinics
Dennis V.
Ferrero,*
Holly N.
Meyers,
Diane E.
Schultz, and
Stephen A.
Willis
San Joaquin County Regional Public Health
Laboratory, Stockton, California
Received 6 April 1998/Returned for modification 26 May
1998/Accepted 16 August 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
The Gen-Probe AMPLIFIED Chlamydia Trachomatis Assay (AMP CT) uses
transcription-mediated amplification and hybridization protection assay
procedures to qualitatively detect Chlamydia trachomatis rRNA in urine, endocervical swab, and urethral specimens. The performance of the AMP CT was compared to that of cell culture for
endocervical swab and urine specimens from women and urethral and urine
specimens from men. Analysis of specimens with discrepant results was
performed by a combination of reculture, direct
fluorescent-antibody (DFA) staining of specimen sediment, and
amplification which targeted a different chlamydial rRNA. A total
of 800 urine samples were tested by the AMP CT (607 from women and 193 from men), and 7.1% were positive for C. trachomatis, with
a sensitivity of 91.2% and a specificity of 99.6% upon discrepant
analysis. A total of 926 swab specimens were tested by culture and AMP
CT (717 endocervical swab specimens and 209 urethral swab specimens
from men), and 7.7% were positive for C. trachomatis, with
a sensitivity and specificity of 100% upon discrepant analysis. The
AMP CT is a sensitive and specific nucleic acid hybridization assay for
the detection of C. trachomatis in endocervical swab
specimens from women, urethral swab specimens from men, and urine
specimens from men and women.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The most prevalent sexually
transmitted disease in the United States today is caused by
Chlamydia trachomatis (1, 3, 4). C. trachomatis may cause urethritis, epididymitis, proctitis, cervicitis, pelvic inflammatory disease, infant pneumonia, and conjunctivitis. The significance of serious complications related to
chlamydial infections has been well established (1, 15). The
advent of managed care and shrinking public health budgets have made
rapid, early, and accurate diagnosis and treatment even more critical.
Until recently, testing capabilities that are noninvasive and that are
applicable to various venues were a particular challenge for the
diagnosis of chlamydial infections. The laboratory technology available
as an aid in the diagnosis of chlamydial infections is currently
undergoing rapid evolution.
Traditional cell culture methods have been the "gold standard" for
the diagnosis of chlamydial infections. However, cell culture methods
are expensive, time-consuming, and subject to laboratory-to-laboratory variation. The advent of enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) and the DNA probe
test (Gen-Probe, Inc.) for direct detection of antigen or nucleic acids
in patient samples provides an alternative to tissue culture
(16). The sensitivities and specificities of EIAs and DNA
probe tests are comparable to those of culture (9-11). The performance of the EIA has been reported to be improved with the use of
verification testing for samples whose results are in the negative grey zone (6, 7). Recently, amplification methods based on PCR and ligase chain reaction have been reported to
offer improved performance over those of culture and nonculture
methods (2, 12-14). The newest amplification procedure to
be cleared in the United States by the Food and Drug
Administration is the AMPLIFIED Chlamydia Trachomatis Assay (AMP
CT; Gen-Probe, Inc.).
The purpose of this study was to assess the performance characteristics
of AMP CT with endocervical swab and urine specimens from women and
urethral swab and urine specimens from men. AMP CT was compared to
standard culture methods.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Study population and sites.
Specimens for routine
C. trachomatis testing were collected from three sites.
Site 1 was the San Joaquin County Public Health sexually transmitted
disease clinic located in Stockton, Calif., which serves a diverse
population. All urethral and urine specimens from men were collected at
this site. Sites 2 and 3 were two family planning clinics. One clinic
is located in Stockton, Calif., and the other one is located in Lodi,
Calif. All endocervical and urine specimens from women were collected
at these two sites.
Specimen collection and transport.
At Site 1, two urethral
swab specimens and a urine specimen were to be collected from each male
patient. The patient must not have urinated within 2 h and must
have provided a first-catch urine specimen in order to be included in
the study. If the patient had urinated within 2 h, a urine
specimen was not collected from the patient. Sixteen male patients were
unable to provide urine specimens because of this restriction. At Sites
2 and 3, two endocervical swab specimens and a urine specimen were to
be collected from each female patient. As for the male patients, if the
women had urinated within 2 h a urine specimen was not collected
from the patient. One hundred ten female patients were unable to
provide urine specimens because of this restriction. At each site the order of swab collection was randomized. One swab sample was used for
culture of C. trachomatis and one swab was tested by
AMP CT. All urine specimens were tested by AMP CT. All specimens tested by culture, swab specimens tested by AMP CT, and urine specimens were
transported to the laboratory on cold pack and were held at 4°C until
testing.
AMP CT procedure.
AMP CT uses transcription-mediated
amplification (TMA) and hybridization protection assay procedures
to qualitatively detect C. trachomatis rRNA in urethral
swab and urine specimens from men and endocervical swab and urine
specimens from women (8). TMA uses two primers and two
enzymes. One primer contains a promoter sequence for RNA polymerase. In
the first step of amplification the promoter-primer hybridizes to the
target rRNA at a predefined site. Reverse transcriptase creates a DNA
copy of the target. A second primer then binds to the DNA copy, and a
new DNA strand is synthesized by reverse transcriptase, creating a
double-stranded DNA molecule. RNA polymerase recognizes the promoter
sequence in the DNA template and initiates a transcription. Each of the newly synthesized RNA copies (amplicons) reenters the TMA process and
serves as a template for a new round of replication, leading to an
exponential expansion of the RNA amplicon. This entire process is
autocatalytic and is performed at a single temperature. The RNA
amplicons are detected by the hybridization protection assay. An
acridinium ester-labeled DNA probe is added and is hybridized to the
target amplicons. Separation of hybridized and unhybridized probes is
performed by the addition of a selection reagent, and the light emitted
is read by a luminometer.
Gen-Probe, Inc., provided swab collection kits and standard urine
collection containers for the specimens to be tested by AMP CT. The
swab specimens were centrifuged at 300 × g for 5 min to bring all fluid to the bottom of the collection tube. Each swab was
then treated with specimen preparation reagent and was heated to 60°C
for 10 min. A 20-µl portion of treated fluid was further diluted in
specimen dilution buffer and tested by AMP CT. Urine specimens were
dispensed into 1.5-ml aliquots, warmed to 35°C, and then centrifuged
at 9,000 × g for 5 min. The pellet was diluted with
specimen dilution buffer and tested by AMP CT. A maximum of 48 specimens, in any combination of urine or swab specimens, as well as
two controls may be tested at one time. Fifty microliters of each
prepared specimen (either swab or urine) was added to a tube containing
amplification reagent and oil reagent; the specimen was added below the
oil layer. Positive and negative controls were prepared in the same
manner. A sealing card was placed over the tubes, and the rack with
tubes was placed into a 95°C heat block for 10 min. The tubes were
then transferred to a 42°C heat block for 5 min; and 25 µl of
enzyme reagent was added to each tube, a sealing card was attached, and
the rack with tubes was swirled to mix the contents of the tubes. The
tubes were incubated for 1 h at 42°C. At the end of
amplification, 20 µl of termination reagent was added to each
tube, a new sealing card was attached, and the rack with tubes was
swirled to mix the contents of the tubes and incubated for a further 10 min. The rack with tubes was then transferred to the hybridization area. To each tube, 100 µl of probe reagent was added and a sealing card was attached; the contents of the tubes in the rack were then
mixed on a multitube vortexer. The tubes were incubated at 60°C in a
water bath for 15 min. The tubes were removed, 300 µl of
selection reagent was added to each tube, and the tubes were sealed and
the contents were swirled mixed as described above. The rack of tubes
was then incubated at 60°C for 10 min. The tubes were allowed to cool
for 5 min prior to reading of the results on a Gen-Probe LEADER. Any
specimen with greater than or equal to 500,000 relative light units
(RLUs) was considered positive for C. trachomatis, and
a reading of less than 40,000 RLUs was considered negative. Any
specimen with an RLU value of between 15,000 and 200,000 was retested.
The positive control must have greater than or equal to 750,000 RLUs,
and the negative control must have less than 20,000 RLUs for the test
to be valid. The swab and urine specimens were stored at
70°C after
initial testing and until all testing was completed.
Culture procedure.
M4 transport medium (MicroTest, Inc.,
Snellville, Ga.) and collection swabs were provided to each site for
culture. The M4 transport medium was vortexed and the swab was removed.
A portion of the M4 transport medium was inoculated onto McCoy cell
shell vials. The McCoy cell shell vials were centrifuged at 4,000 × g for 60 min at 30°C. At the completion of
centrifugation the vials were removed and the specimen was aspirated
from each vial and replaced with an isolation medium containing
cycloheximide. The vials were incubated at 35°C for 48 to 72 h.
Each vial was fixed with reagent alcohol for 1 to 10 min and was then
stained with fluorescent-antibody stain according to the
manufacturer's instructions (Behring Diagnostics, Inc.).
Discrepant analysis.
AMP CT-positive, culture-negative
specimens were further analyzed by repeat culture, direct
fluorescent-antibody (DFA) testing, and/or a supplementary TMA assay
which detected a different rRNA target. AMP CT-negative,
culture-positive specimens were not further analyzed. Specimens found
to be initially positive by culture or positive after discrepant
analysis were considered true positives. Repeat culture was performed
as previously described in this article. Confirmation by DFA testing
was performed with specimens on culture transport medium and urine
specimens. The M4 transport medium was centrifuged at 13,000 × g for 15 min, the supernatant was decanted, and the pellet
was placed on a MicroTrak (Behring Diagnostics, Inc.) slide, air dried,
fixed with absolute methanol for 5 min, and then stained by the
MicroTrak Direct Specimen Test. The following procedure was used for
urine specimens. A 1.5-ml portion of urine was centrifuged at
13,000 × g for 5 min, the supernatant was decanted, and the pellet was washed with physiological saline and then
centrifuged at 13,000 × g for 5 min. The supernatant
was discarded and the pellet was resuspended in 10 µl of water. The
pellet was placed on a MicroTrak slide, air dried, fixed with absolute
methanol for 5 min, and then stained with the MicroTrak Direct Specimen Test. Each slide was examined for the presence of elementary bodies; the observation of one or more elementary bodies constituted a positive
test result. Results for AMP CT-positive, DFA assay-negative specimens
were further resolved by a supplementary TMA assay which detected a
different rRNA target. The assay was performed by Gen-Probe, Inc. A
specimen with a false-positive result by AMP CT caused by amplicon
contamination will not be positive by the supplementary TMA assay,
whereas a specimen with true-positive signal due to C. trachomatis rRNA will be positive.
 |
RESULTS |
A total of 926 swab specimens and 800 urine specimens were tested
by AMP CT and 926 swab specimens were tested by tissue culture. Table
1 contains the results of the initial
tests for urine and genital swab specimens from men and women. The
sensitivity and specificity for urine specimens from men and women
before discrepant analysis were 88.5 and 97.5%, respectively. The
sensitivity and specificity for urethral swab specimens from men and
endocervical swab specimens from women before discrepant analysis were
100 and 97.7%, respectively. These calculations were based on a cell culture sensitivity and specificity of 100% each. Sixteen urine specimens from eight male patients and eight female patients were apparent false positives by AMP CT upon initial testing. However, upon
discrepant analysis, 13 urine specimens from eight male patients and
five female patients were found to be true positive and urine specimens
from three female patients were determined to be false positive by AMP
CT. Of these, urine specimens from five male patients and two female
patients were DFA assay positive, and urine specimens from three male
patients and three female patients were positive by the alternate TMA
assay. Eleven urethral swab specimens from men and nine endocervical
swab specimens were apparently false positive by AMP CT upon initial
testing, but upon discrepant analysis all 20 specimens were determined
to be true positive. Of these, four swab specimens from women and two
swab specimens from men were positive by the DFA assay and seven swab
specimens from men and seven swab specimens from women were positive by
the alternate TMA assay.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1.
Comparison of cell culture and AMP CT results for
C. trachomatis from swab and urine specimens from men
and women before and after resolution by discrepant analysis
|
|
Five urine specimens from three male patients and two female
patients were determined to be false negative by AMP CT. Table 1 also
contains the results after discrepant analysis. The sensitivity for
urine specimens from men after discrepant analysis was 88.5%, and that
for urethral swab specimens was 100%. The specificity for urine and
swab specimens from men after discrepant analysis was 100%. The
sensitivity for urine specimens from women after discrepant analysis
was 93.5%, and that for endocervical swab specimens was 100%. The
specificity for urine specimens from women after discrepant analysis
was 99.5%, and that for endocervical swab specimens was 100%. The
combined positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive
value (NPV) for urine specimens from men and women after discrepant
analysis were 95.0 and 99.9%, respectively, and were calculated on the
basis of an overall prevalence of 7.7%. The PPV and NPV for swab
specimens from men and women after discrepant analysis were 100%
each and were calculated on the basis of a 7.7% prevalence (Table
2).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 2.
Sensitivity, specificity, prevalence, PPV, and NPV for
AMP CT before and after resolution by discrepant analysis
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
AMP CT is a sensitive and specific nucleic acid hybridization
assay for the detection of C. trachomatis in male and
female patients (5). The sensitivity for genital swab
specimens from men and women after discrepant analysis was 100%,
with a specificity of 100% and a PPV and NPV of 100% each. Use of
only a urine specimen still gave comparable results, with a
sensitivity of 91.2%, a specificity of 99.6%, a PPV of 94.5%, and an
NPV of 99.3%. Use of a noninvasive specimen such as urine has its
advantages if the patient is reluctant to allow a swab sample to be
collected or if the collection venue does not permit invasive genital
sampling procedures with a swab.
The assay can be performed in 1 day, thus eliminating the 3- to 4-day
turnaround for a culture result. AMP CT does not require specialized equipment such as a thermal cycler. The swab specimens for
AMP CT may be held at room temperature (<25°C) for up to 7 days.
Urine specimens may be held at room temperature (up to 30°C) for
24 h after collection and during transport or up to 7 days if it
is stored at 2 to 8°C. Culture specimens usually must be tested
within 3 days and must be held at 4°C prior to being tested and
during transport. This also lends more flexibility to the use of AMP CT
compared to other amplification procedures, which require more
stringent specimen handling.
The sensitivities of cell culture compared to the results after
discrepant analysis of AMP CT (true-positive results) for urine
specimens from men and women and for urethral from men and endocervical
specimens from women were 77.2 and 71.8%, respectively. The sensitivity of cell culture can vary greatly from
laboratory to laboratory. Even in experienced laboratories, culture has
a reported sensitivity of only 70 to 85% (1, 10, 12). The advantage of culture is the ability to visualize the inclusion body,
and confirmation assays are not necessary. The advantages of nonculture
methods over culture methods include the need for less stringent
transport times and transport temperatures. The time from specimen
receipt to result can be reduced by one-half compared to the times for
culture. The ability to use a specimen collected by a noninvasive
procedure such as urine for the diagnosis of chlamydial infection has
the potential to broaden screening efforts to nontraditional venues.
In conclusion, AMP CT performs very well compared to the performance of
tissue culture. AMP CT has performance characteristics with urethral
and endocervical swab specimens which are equal to or superior to those
published for comparisons of EIA and nonamplification nucleic acid
probe assays to tissue culture (16). AMP CT has performance
characteristics which are comparable to those published for comparisons
of tissue culture to other amplification assays such as LCR and PCR
(2, 12-14).
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
Our appreciation and thanks go to Linda Buck-Barrington, Kellie
Trevena, and Steven Stewart for performing the testing during this
study.
This study was supported in part by a grant from Gen-Probe, Inc.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: San Joaquin
County Regional Public Health Laboratory, 1601 E. Hazelton Ave., P.O.
Box 2009, Stockton, CA 95201. Phone: (209) 468-3462. Fax: (209)
468-0639. E-mail: ferr104w{at}wonder.em.cdc.gov.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Black, C.
1997.
Current methods of laboratory diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis Infections.
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
10:160-184[Abstract].
|
| 2.
|
Bulmer, M.,
G. J. J. van Doornum,
S. Ching,
P. G. H. Peerbooms,
P. K. Plier,
D. Ram, and H. H. Lee.
1996.
Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae by ligase chain reaction-based assays with clinical specimens from various sites: implications for diagnostic testing and screening.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
34:2395-2400[Abstract].
|
| 3.
|
Centers for Disease Control.
1985.
Chlamydia trachomatis infection policy guidelines for prevention and control.
Morbid. Mortal. Weekly Rep.
35:535-574.
|
| 4.
|
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
1993.
Recommendations for the prevention and management of Chlamydia trachomatis infections.
Morbid. Mortal. Weekly Rep.
42(No. RR-12):1-39[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Crotchfelt, K.,
B. Pare,
C. Gaydos, and T. Quinn.
1998.
Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by the Gen-Probe AMPLIFIED Chlamydia Trachomatis Assay (AMP CT) in urine specimens from men and women and endocervical specimens from women.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
36:391-394[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Dean, D.,
D. Ferrero, and M. Mc Carthy.
1998.
Comparison of performance and cost-effectiveness of direct fluorescent-antibody, ligase chain reaction, and PCR assays for verification of chlamydial enzyme immunoassay results for populations with a low to moderate prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
36:94-99[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Ferrero, D. V.,
S. A. Willis, and M. M. McCarthy.
1996.
Verification of Micro Trak II Chlamydia enzyme immunoassay reactive and negative grey zone results by PCR, abstr. C41, p. 21.
In
Abstracts of the 96th General Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology 1996. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
|
| 8.
|
Hill, C. S.
1996.
Gen-Probe® transcription-mediated amplification: system principles.
Gen-Probe, Inc., San Diego, Calif.
|
| 9.
|
Hill, C. S.
1995.
DNA probe assays for the detection of sexually transmitted diseases.
Am. Clin. Lab.
10:8.
|
| 10.
|
Kellogg, J. A.
1989.
Clinical considerations of culture vs. antigen assays for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis from genital specimens.
Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med.
113:453-460[Medline].
|
| 11.
|
McCarthy, M., and D. MacColloch.
1993.
MicroTrak II Chlamydia EIA blocking reagent versus MicroTrak Chlamydia trachomatis Direct Specimen Test for verification of Chlamydia EIA nonreactive grayzone results, abstr. C-412, p. 519.
In
Abstracts of the 93rd General Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology 1993. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
|
| 12.
|
Ostergaard, L.,
S. Birkelund, and G. Christiansen.
1990.
Use of the polymerase chain reaction for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
28:1254-1260[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Pasternack, R.,
P. Vuorinen,
A. Kuukankorpi,
T. Pitkajarvi, and A. Miettinen.
1996.
Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women by Amplicor PCR: comparison of diagnostic performance with urine and cervical specimens.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
34:995-998[Abstract].
|
| 14.
|
Quinn, T. C.,
L. Welsh,
A. Lentz,
K. Crotchfelt,
J. Zenilman,
J. Newhall, and C. Gaydos.
1996.
Diagnosis by Amplicor PCR of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in urine samples from women and men attending sexually transmitted disease clinics.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
34:1401-1406[Abstract].
|
| 15.
|
Schachter, J.
1992.
Chlamydial infections, p. 817-822.
In
S. L. Gorbach, J. G. Bartlett, and N. R. Blacklow (ed.), Infectious diseases. The W. B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia, Pa.
|
| 16.
|
Waren, R.,
B. Dwyer,
M. Plackett,
K. Pettit,
N. Rizvi, and A.-M. Baker.
1993.
Comparative evaluation of detection assays for Chlamydia trachomatis.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
31:1663-1666[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, November 1998, p. 3230-3233, Vol. 36, No. 11
0095-1137/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Yang, J. L., Hong, K. C., Schachter, J., Moncada, J., Lekew, T., House, J. I., Zhou, Z., Neuwelt, M. D., Rutar, T., Halfpenny, C., Shah, N., Whitcher, J. P., Lietman, T. M.
(2009). Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis Ocular Infection in Trachoma-Endemic Communities by rRNA Amplification. IOVS
50: 90-94
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Yang, J. L, Schachter, J., Moncada, J., Habte, D., Zerihun, M., House, J. I, Zhou, Z., Hong, K. C, Maxey, K., Gaynor, B. D, Lietman, T. M
(2007). Comparison of an rRNA-based and DNA-based nucleic acid amplification test for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in trachoma. Br. J. Ophthalmol.
91: 293-295
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Cook, R. L., Hutchison, S. L., Ostergaard, L., Braithwaite, R. S., Ness, R. B.
(2005). Systematic Review: Noninvasive Testing for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae. ANN INTERN MED
142: 914-925
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Chernesky, M. A., Martin, D. H., Hook, E. W., Willis, D., Jordan, J., Wang, S., Lane, J. R., Fuller, D., Schachter, J.
(2005). Ability of New APTIMA CT and APTIMA GC Assays To Detect Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Male Urine and Urethral Swabs. J. Clin. Microbiol.
43: 127-131
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Gaydos, C. A., Theodore, M., Dalesio, N., Wood, B. J., Quinn, T. C.
(2004). Comparison of Three Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests for Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in Urine Specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol.
42: 3041-3045
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Gaydos, C. A., Quinn, T. C., Willis, D., Weissfeld, A., Hook, E. W., Martin, D. H., Ferrero, D. V., Schachter, J.
(2003). Performance of the APTIMA Combo 2 Assay for Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Female Urine and Endocervical Swab Specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol.
41: 304-309
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
WATSON, E. J., TEMPLETON, A., RUSSELL, I., PAAVONEN, J., MARDH, P.-A., STARY, A., PEDERSON, B. S.
(2002). The accuracy and efficacy of screening tests for Chlamydia trachomatis: a systematic review. J Med Microbiol
51: 1021-1031
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Wilson, K. H., Wilson, W. J., Radosevich, J. L., DeSantis, T. Z., Viswanathan, V. S., Kuczmarski, T. A., Andersen, G. L.
(2002). High-Density Microarray of Small-Subunit Ribosomal DNA Probes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
68: 2535-2541
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bianchi, A., Moret, F., Desrues, J.-M., Champenois, T., Dervaux, Y., Desvouas, O., Oursin, A., Quinzat, D., Dachez, R., Bathelier, C., Ronsin, C.
(2002). PreservCyt Transport Medium Used for the ThinPrep Pap Test Is a Suitable Medium for Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by the COBAS Amplicor CT/NG Test: Results of a Preliminary Study and Future Implications. J. Clin. Microbiol.
40: 1749-1754
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Johnson, S. J., Green, D. H., Reed, D. A., Wood, L. S.
(2001). Semiautomation of Nucleic Acid-based Assays for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae,. Clin. Chem.
47: 760-763
[Full Text]
-
Van Der Pol, B., Ferrero, D. V., Buck-Barrington, L., Hook, E. III, Lenderman, C., Quinn, T., Gaydos, C. A., Lovchik, J., Schachter, J., Moncada, J., Hall, G., Tuohy, M. J., Jones, R. B.
(2001). Multicenter Evaluation of the BDProbeTec ET System for Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Urine Specimens, Female Endocervical Swabs, and Male Urethral Swabs. J. Clin. Microbiol.
39: 1008-1016
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Morré, S. A., Van Valkengoed, I. G. M., Moes, R. M., Boeke, A. J. P., Meijer, C. J. L. M., Van den Brule, A. J. C.
(1999). Determination of Chlamydia trachomatis Prevalence in an Asymptomatic Screening Population: Performances of the LCx and COBAS Amplicor Tests with Urine Specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol.
37: 3092-3096
[Abstract]
[Full Text]