Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, November 1998, p. 3408-3409, Vol. 36, No. 11
0095-1137/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Enhancement of the AMPLICOR Enterovirus PCR Test
with a Coprecipitant
E. William
Taggart,1,*
Carrie L.
Byington,2
David R.
Hillyard,1,3
John E.
Robison,1 and
Karen C.
Carroll1,3
Associated Regional and University
Pathologists Institute for Clinical and Experimental
Pathology,1
Department of
Pediatrics,2 and
Department of
Pathology,3 University of Utah Health
Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah
Received 3 April 1998/Returned for modification 12 June
1998/Accepted 20 August 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
The incorporation of a commercially available coprecipitant into
the AMPLICOR enterovirus PCR test specimen preparation enhanced the
sensitivity and reproducibility of this assay. Fifty-five previously
tested archived cerebrospinal fluids (CSF) specimens were tested in a
blind study in duplicate with and without Pellet Paint coprecipitant
(Novagen, Inc., Madison, Wis.). Of these specimens, 26 had previously
been determined to be positive and 29 had previously been determined to
be negative. All previously positive CSF specimens were positive when
Pellet Paint was used and only 18 were positive without Pellet Paint.
No previously negative specimens were positive on repeat testing with
or without Pellet Paint. The background signal was not affected by the
addition of Pellet Paint. These data support the utility of a
coprecipitant in minimizing false-negative results.
 |
TEXT |
Enteroviruses (EVs) are
single-stranded RNA viruses and are members of the
Picornaviridae family. Currently there exist 67 identifiable
serotypes: wild-type polioviruses 1 to 3 and the nonpolio EVs
consisting of coxsackieviruses A 1 to 22 and 24; coxsackieviruses B 1 to 6; echoviruses 1 to 9, 11 to 27, and 29 to 33; and the
"numbered" EVs 68 to 71. EVs cause an estimated 10 to 30 million
infections annually in the United States (4). These
infections, which peak July through October, most commonly affect young
children, in whom the severity of infection is dependent on age. The
EVs are an interesting group because of the broad range of diseases
they cause. Common syndromes include nonspecific febrile illness with
or without rash, acute hemorrhagic conjunctivitis, hand-foot-and-mouth
disease, sepsis syndrome in newborns, myocarditis, hepatitis, and a
variety of central nervous system infections. The latter syndromes are
the most troublesome in terms of their confusion with infections with
other viral and bacterial pathogens, which may lead to unnecessary
treatments and diagnostic tests (5).
This study, incorporating Novagen Pellet Paint coprecipitant to enhance
sample nucleic acid preparation for PCR detection, was done as part of
a larger study comparing PCR detection to culture performed on
cerebrospinal fluids (CSF) submitted to the ARUP diagnostic virology
lab between 1 January 1997 and 1 January 1998 for EV diagnosis (data
not shown). The culture employed spin-amplified shell vial techniques
(9) and the following cell lines: PMK (primary rhesus monkey
kidney), RD (rhabdomyosarcoma), A549 (human lung carcinoma), BGM
(African green monkey kidney), MRC-5 (human fetal lung), and HFF (human
foreskin fibroblast). Cultures were incubated in CO2 for 10 days at 37°C and scanned for cytopathic effect once a day on each of
the 10 days. Cells with cytopathic effect were stained by polyvalent
and monovalent fluorescent antibody staining (kits from Chemicon
International, Inc., Temecula, Calif.) or identified with World Health
Organization antiserum typing pools.
The PCR was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions by
using the AMPLICOR EV test kit (Roche Molecular Systems, Branchburg, N.J.). The AMPLICOR EV PCR test is a direct RNA probe test
that utilizes PCR for nucleic acid amplification for the detection of
EV RNA in human CSF. The assay uses primers from the highly conserved
750-bp nucleotide sequence of the 5' nontranslated region of the EV
genome. The primers Ev2b and Ev1b define a 150-bp nucleotide sequence
within the highly conserved 5' nontranslated region. The downstream, or
antisense, primer, Evb1, is biotinylated at the 5' end (1-3, 8,
10).
After the PCR amplification process, the amplicons are chemically
denatured to form single strands that are added to a microwell plate
(MWP) containing the amplicon-specific oligonucleotide probe EV3. This
specific hybridization of the amplicons to EV3 increases the overall
specificity of the reaction. After unbound material is removed from the
MWP, an avidin-horseradish peroxidase conjugate is added to the plate.
The avidin binds to the biotin-labeled amplicons captured by the
plate-bound probe, EV3. After unbound conjugate has been removed,
peroxide and tetramethylbenzidine are added and a color complex is
formed following reaction with the horseradish peroxidase. The reaction
is stopped by the addition of weak acid, the optical density (OD) is
measured at 450 nm in an automated MWP reader, and the results are
compared to the supplied cutoff value. The assay requires approximately
5 h to perform, including sample preparation, amplification, and
detection (7).
Experience with this PCR kit indicated that the manufacturer's
positive control gave inconsistent results, requiring that a known EV
isolate be included in each assay as a backup positive control
(unpublished observation). On those occasions, it was evident that a
pellet did not appear during sample preparation or in the
manufacturer's control preparation. The sample preparation procedure
includes a step where nucleic acid is precipitated with 100% isopropyl
alcohol and pelleted by centrifugation at 12,000 × g.
After centrifugation, the supernatant is aspirated with a fine-tipped
disposable pipette, with much care taken not to disturb the pellet that
has adhered to the bottom or side of the tube. In many cases a pellet
was not visible and sample preparation needed to be restarted according
to the EV PCR procedure. CSF specimens, particularly those from
newborns, are frequently received as minimal volumes for testing,
precluding repeat sample preparation. The addition of 2 µl of
glycogen during sample preparation did not improve the appearance of
the nucleic acid pellet in comparison to Pellet Paint incorporation.
Novagen Pellet Paint coprecipitant was investigated for use as part of
this PCR product procedure. It is a brightly colored polymeric carrier
molecule designed specifically for nucleic acid precipitation to
enhance visibility of the pellet. The Pellet Paint was tested for its
ability to inhibit or cause reduced sensitivity of the amplification
reaction. Pellet Paint was also tested for its ability to inhibit or
cause sensitivity changes by adding it after the PCR prior to the
detection steps. Several different production lots of Pellet Paint were
obtained and tested against the positive control, with no variation
(n = 3, mean = 3.565, standard deviation [
] = 0.054). Inhibition testing was also done by directly adding 2 µl of
Pellet Paint to the amplification reaction mixture (total volume, 100 µl).
Twenty-three positive controls were run in duplicate with and without
Pellet Paint. The mean positive control OD with Pellet Paint was 3.750 (
of 0.242), whereas the mean positive control without Pellet Paint
was 3.300 (
of 1.098). Seventeen paired negative controls were also
tested to study possible background changes. The mean negative control
OD with Pellet Paint (negative result, OD of <0.350) was 0.068, with a
of 0.018; without Pellet Paint, the values were 0.073 and 0.021, respectively. One positive control was aliquoted into 20 separate
reaction tubes of which 10 had Novagen Pellet Paint added and 10 did
not. The mean OD with Pellet Paint was 3.737 (
= 0.162), and without
Pellet Paint the mean was 3.753 (
= 0.155). Serial dilutions of
Pellet Paint were also investigated, and the recommended amount of
Pellet Paint per specimen preparation (approximately 0.4%) was optimal
for the Pellet Paint lots tested. Fifty-five CSF specimens (stored at
70°C) from the entire study population (n = 494)
were also tested in duplicate with and without Pellet Paint in a blind
study. Twenty-six of these were previously determined to be positive and 29 were previously determined to be negative by culture and PCR. On
repeat testing, all 26 previously positive specimens prepared with
Pellet Paint were again positive and only 18 without Pellet Paint were
positive. Of the eight discordant specimens, two had low-level
positivity (OD,
1.00), two had moderate positivity (ODs, >1.00 and
<2.00), and four had high-level positivity (OD,
2.00)
(6). One moderately positive CSF specimen had originally had
high-level positivity on its initial assay, indicating a loss of viral
titer probably due to freeze-thawing of the sample. The 54 remaining
specimens showed no loss or gain of signal on repeat testing. All
previously negative specimens retested as negative both with and
without Pellet Paint. The sensitivity of the PCR without Pellet Paint
was 69.2%, while the specificity of the PCR without Pellet Paint was
100%. All testing was done with the same plate washer, reader, and
AMPLICOR EV test kit lot number for consistency.
Incorporation of Novagen Pellet Paint coprecipitant into the Roche
AMPLICOR EV test was found to improve the reproducibility and increase
the sensitivity and showed no inhibitory effects at various
concentrations. These data suggest that the incorporation of Novagen
Pellet Paint coprecipitant into the AMPLICOR EV test or similar assays
may enhance the performance. It should be noted that the sensitivity of
the AMPLICOR EV test kit varies for the 67 recognized EV serotypes. The
mean OD of positive specimens was obtained only to compare the
performance of the assay with and without incorporation of Pellet
Paint. The OD reading per se is not indicative of the analytical
sensitivity of the AMPLICOR EV test kit. This procedure has been
routinely incorporated into the EV PCR assay in our laboratory.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: ARUP Institute
for Clinical and Experimental Pathology, 500 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, UT 84108. Phone: (801) 583-2787, ext. 2018. Fax: (801) 584-5207. E-mail: VIROLOGY{at}arup-lab.com.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Jenkins, O.,
J. D. Booth,
P. D. Minor, et al.
1987.
The complete nucleotide sequence of coxsackievirus B4 and its comparison to other members of the picornaviridae.
J. Gen. Virol.
68:1835-1848[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Mullis, K. B., and F. Faloona.
1987.
Specific synthesis of DNA in vitro via a polymerase-catalyzed chain reaction.
Methods Enymol.
155:335-350.
|
| 3.
|
Myers, T. W., and D. H. Gelfand.
1991.
Reverse transcription and DNA amplification by a Thermus thermophilus DNA polymerase.
Biochemistry
30:7661-7666[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Rotbart, H. A.,
P. S. Eastman,
J. L. Ruth,
K. K. Hirata, and M. J. Levin.
1988.
Nonisotopic oligomeric probes for the human enteroviruses.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
26:2669-2671[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Rotbart, H. A.
1995.
Enteroviral infections of the central nervous system.
Clin. Infect. Dis.
20:971-981[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Rotbart, H. A.
1997.
Reproducibility of AMPLICOR enterovirus PCR test results.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
35:3301-3302[Abstract].
|
| 7.
|
Rotbart, H. A.,
M. H. Sawyer,
S. Fast,
C. Lewinski,
N. Murphy,
E. F. Keyser,
J. Spadoro,
S.-Y Kao, and M. Loeffelholz.
1994.
Diagnosis of enteroviral meningitis by using PCR with a colorimetric microwell detection assay.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
32:2590-2592[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Saiki, R. K.,
S. Scharf,
F. Faloona, et al.
1985.
Enzymatic amplification of -globin genomic sequences and restriction site analysis for diagnosis for sickle cell anemia.
Science
230:1350-1354[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Salmon, V. C.,
B. K. Michaels, and R. B. Turner.
1984.
Comparison of cell culture with an immunoperoxidase kit for rapid diagnosis of herpes simplex virus infections.
Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.
2:343-345[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Toyoda, H.,
M. Kohara,
Y. Kataoka, et al.
1984.
Complete nucleotide sequence of all three poliovirus serotype genomes.
J. Mol. Biol.
174:561-585[Medline].
|
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, November 1998, p. 3408-3409, Vol. 36, No. 11
0095-1137/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Xu, M., Chan, Y., Fischer, S. H., Remaley, A. T.
(2002). Improvement of AMPLICOR Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Viral Load Test (Version 1.5) by Addition of a Coprecipitant during the RNA Isolation Step. J. Clin. Microbiol.
40: 2616-2617
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Cubero, J., Graham, J. H., Gottwald, T. R.
(2001). Quantitative PCR Method for Diagnosis of Citrus Bacterial Canker. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
67: 2849-2852
[Abstract]
[Full Text]