This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kirkpatrick, W. R. Articles by Patterson, T. F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kirkpatrick, W. R. Articles by Patterson, T. F.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, November 1998, p. 3429-3432, Vol. 36, No. 11
0095-1137/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Fluconazole Disk Diffusion Susceptibility Testing of Candida Species

Departments of Medicine,¹ Pathology,² and General Dentistry,³ The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, and Audie Murphy Division, South Texas Veterans Health Care System,⁴ San Antonio, Texas 78284

Received 24 April 1998/Returned for modification 2 June 1998/Accepted 4 August 1998

	ABSTRACT

Top Abstract Text References

We describe a simple procedure for detecting fluconazole-resistant yeasts by a disk diffusion method. Forty clinical Candida sp. isolates were tested on RPMI-glucose agar with either 25- or 50-µg fluconazole disks. With 25-µg disks, zones of inhibition of 20 mm at 24 h accurately identified 29 of 29 isolates for which MICs were 8 µg/ml, and with 50-µg disks, zones of 27 mm identified 28 of 29 such isolates. All 11 isolates for which MICs were >8 µg/ml were identified by using either disk. Disk diffusion may be a useful screening method for clinical microbiology laboratories.

	TEXT

Top Abstract Text References

Advances in supportive therapy for immunocompromised patients have led to increased rates of fungal infections (9, 20). With the widespread use of fluconazole for treatment and prevention of oropharyngeal candidiasis, the most common fungal infection in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (18, 22), clinical resistance is becoming a serious problem (5, 11, 18, 22). Consequently, a rapid, reproducible method of fluconazole susceptibility testing would be useful in determining the epidemiology of and optimal treatment for infection with resistant isolates (4, 8, 13, 21). Candida albicans is usually acutely susceptible to fluconazole; fluconazole MICs for approximately 90% of C. albicans isolates are 1 µg/ml (16, 19). Some non-C. albicans yeasts have been noted to have decreased susceptibility or resistance to fluconazole (19, 22); these species include C. glabrata and C. krusei, which are being isolated more frequently (7, 24).

Screening clinical yeast isolates for decreased susceptibility to fluconazole has been difficult. Methodologies such as the standard National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) broth macrodilution test (12) and alternative methods such as the E test or microdilution adaptations of the NCCLS method generally compare favorably for determining MICs for isolates (3, 10, 15, 23); however, these are not easily adapted to the screening of yeasts for fluconazole susceptibility. A disk diffusion method analogous to that used for testing antibacterial agents could be easily incorporated into a clinical laboratory and serve as an effective means for fluconazole susceptibility screening. Previously described disk diffusion methods utilize disks or employ media not available for routine use (2, 24). We have developed a disk diffusion method for susceptibility screening which uses disks that are simple to prepare and standard media, such that it could be easily implemented in routine clinical mycology laboratories.

(This study was presented in part at the 97th General Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology, Miami Beach, Fla., 4 to 8 May 1997 [25]).

Medium. RPMI 1640 with L-glutamine and morpholinepropanesulfonic acid (MOPS) organic buffer (ABI, Niagara Falls, N.Y.) was prepared from a powdered medium at double the desired concentration with 500 ml of deionized H₂O, and the solution was sterile filtered. Bacto Agar (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, Mich.) was also prepared at a 2× concentration by adding 20 g of agar to 500 ml of deionized H₂O (14). The solution was mixed over heat to dissolve the agar, autoclaved, and then cooled to 48°C in a water bath. The agar and RPMI 1640 solutions were combined at 48°C and stirred, and approximately 20 ml was dispensed into sterile 100-mm-diameter petri plates. The medium was allowed to cool and harden at room temperature for 3 to 5 days, and the plates were then stored at 4°C and used within 1 to 2 weeks.

Organisms and reference methods. Forty clinical isolates of Candida spp., representing forty consecutive clinical samples, which were submitted to the Fungus Testing Lab (The University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Tex.) for MIC determination by both the NCCLS broth macrodilution procedure (12) and a broth microdilution adaptation (1, 6) were selected for evaluation. Both 24- and 48-h MIC readings were evaluated, coordinating, respectively, with 24- and 48-h disk results. The breakdown of Candida species was as follows: 35 isolates were C. albicans, 2 were C. krusei, 1 was C. tropicalis, 1 was C. parapsilosis, and 1 was C. glabrata.

Fluconazole disks. Twenty-five-microgram disks were prepared by pipetting 12.5-µl volumes of stock fluconazole (2 mg/ml; Pfizer-Roerig, New York, N.Y.) onto sterile blank disks (Difco Laboratories), while 50-µg disks were similarly prepared by using 25 µl of fluconazole solution. The disks were dried and then stored at 4°C until use within 1 to 2 weeks.

Inoculum. The yeast isolates were stored at room temperature in sterile deionized H₂O, subcultured onto Sabouraud dextrose agar (BBL, Cockeysville, Md.) to ensure purity and viability (2), and then subcultured again to select for isolated colonies. Three to five colonies were then suspended in 5.0 ml of sterile deionized H₂O and mixed thoroughly on a vortex mixer. The suspension was adjusted to a 0.5 McFarland turbidity standard (10⁶ CFU/ml) by using a spectrophotometer (17). Serial log₁₀ dilutions of the adjusted suspension were prepared and quantitatively cultured to determine counts of CFU. A 1-ml inoculum from a suspension of 10⁴ CFU/ml yielded optimal confluent growth for lawn formation.

Paired RPMI-glucose plates were individually inoculated with 1 ml of suspension formed from each yeast isolate, which was spread on the surface of the medium with a bent, sterile glass rod. A disk containing 25 µg of fluconazole was then applied to one inoculated plate, and a 50-µg fluconazole disk was applied to the other by using flamed forceps. Duplicate sets of plates were incubated at 30°C, and zone diameters were measured at 24 and 48 h. For each yeast isolate, the procedure was performed three separate times and the results were compared for reproducibility.

Zone determination and comparative MIC interpretation. Inhibitory zone diameters were measured at the transitional point where growth abruptly decreased, as determined by a marked reduction in colony sizes (Fig. 1). The zone sizes measured at 24 and 48 h were then plotted against respective 24- and 48-h MICs determined by the reference methods. To interpret zone diameters, the NCCLS method was followed, in which MIC breakpoints of 8 µg/ml define susceptibility and 64 µg/ml define resistance, with MICs of between 16 and 32 µg/ml reflecting dose-dependent susceptibility (12). Zones corresponding to these MIC breakpoints were determined graphically through regression analysis for 25-µg (Fig. 2A) and 50-µg (panel B) disks at 24 and 48 h (data not shown).

View larger version (92K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 1.   (A) A 25-µg fluconazole disk on a lawn of 104 CFU of C. albicans after 24 h of incubation. (B) A 50-µg fluconazole disk on a lawn of 104 CFU of C. albicans after 48 h of incubation. Inhibitory zone diameters were measured at the transitional point where growth abruptly decreased (interior edges of bars), as determined by a marked reduction in colony sizes.

View larger version (12K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 2.   (A) Regression analysis correlating zones of inhibition (24 h) obtained with 25-µg fluconazole disks with NCCLS 24-h broth macrodilution MICs. (B) Regression analysis correlating zones of inhibition (24 h) obtained with 50-µg fluconazole disks with NCCLS 24-h broth macrodilution MICs.

Regression analysis on curve plots for 25- and 50-µg disk zones versus macrodilution MICs defined interpretive breakpoints of 20 mm for susceptibility (MIC  8 µg/ml) with 25-µg disks and 27 mm with 50-µg disks at both 24 and 48 h. Zones which were smaller than these breakpoints were defined as indicating either dose-dependent susceptibility or resistance.

Three separate trials with 25- and 50-µg disks were performed on all 40 isolates for verification of reproducibility. Regression analysis indicated that zones could vary up to 4 mm and remain within ±1 reference tube dilution (NCCLS broth macrodilution method). Zones from all three trials met these criteria for 95% of isolates at 24 h, but at 48 h criteria were met for only 86% (data not shown).

Zone diameters measured at 24 h for 25- and 50-µg disks showed excellent correlation with predicted macrodilution 24-h MICs for susceptible yeasts. Diameters for 25-µg drug concentration disks accurately identified 29 of 29 (100%) of the isolates for which MICs were 8 µg/ml. Disks with 50 µg of fluconazole provided similar results, identifying 28 of 29 (97%) of the isolates for which MICs were 8 µg/ml. The zone diameters also correlated well with macrodilution 24-h MICs in predicting either dose-dependent susceptibility or resistance in yeast strains. Zones at 24 h with either 25- or 50-µg disks identified 11 of 11 (100%) isolates for which MICs were 16 µg/ml. Although yeast strains for which MICs were 16 µg/ml were accurately identified by the disk method, results could not adequately differentiate strains with dose-dependent susceptibility (MICs of 16 to 32 µg/ml) from fully resistant strains (MICs of 64 µg/ml). Comparison of disk diameters to microdilution MICs showed correlation similar to the correlation with broth macrodilution reference method MICs (data not shown).

Zone diameters after 48 h correlated less well with the reference macrodilution 48-h MICs at either drug concentration, with the 25- or 50-µg disks accurately predicting MICs of 8 µg/ml for 23 of 26 (88%) isolates. Sensitivity in identification of yeasts for which MICs were 16 µg/ml was much lower at 48 h: predictions were correct for only 11 of 14 (79%) isolates with 25-µg disks and 12 of 14 (86%) isolates with 50-µg disks. As with 24-h results, comparison of disk diameters to microdilution MICs showed similar correlation (data not shown).

As a screening tool, the disk diffusion procedure correlated well with the NCCLS reference broth macrodilution method and the microdilution method in identifying fluconazole-susceptible yeasts. In this study, both 25- and 50-µg fluconazole disks allowed correct determination of all fluconazole-susceptible isolates examined. Quick discernment of susceptibility would allow clinical laboratories to focus more effort on characterization of less-susceptible isolates. Yeasts which have dose-dependent susceptibility or frank resistance could not be readily differentiated from each other based on disk diffusion results. Such isolates could be reexamined by other, more discriminating tests such as the E test or a broth microdilution adaptation of the NCCLS method.

Reading inoculated plates with 25-µg disks after 24 h resulted in the most sensitive method, accurately identifying 100% of susceptible Candida spp. with a diameter of 20 mm. Although 50-µg disks also yielded good results, no distinct advantage of using the higher-concentration disk rather than the 25-µg disk was found. Zone diameter results noted after 48 h were much less sensitive than the corresponding 24-h results for disks of both drug concentrations. Disk diffusion testing could probably be performed at 24 h with most Candida species; however, some species, such as C. krusei, do not always show resistance at 24 h and results should be read at 48 h (2).

The fluconazole disk diffusion procedure showed very good reproducibility at 24 h (95%), with some decline after 48 h (86%). The presence of microcolonies necessitated measurement of zone diameters at the transitional point where growth abruptly decreased from normal-sized colonies (Fig. 1). Thus, a certain amount of subjectivity was introduced into zone determination, as is the case for endpoint determination decisions made with the E-test (4) or NCCLS M27-A (12) methods.

The use of the fluconazole disk diffusion procedure appears to be a convenient and sensitive method for susceptibility screening or detection of fluconazole-resistant yeasts. Additional studies with a wider variety of yeast isolates should be conducted to determine the appropriateness of screening clinical isolates in this manner.

	FOOTNOTES

^* Corresponding author. Mailing address: The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr., San Antonio, TX 78284-7881. Phone: (210) 567-4823. Fax: (210) 567-4670. E-mail: PATTERSON{at}UTHSCSA.EDU.

	REFERENCES

Top Abstract Text References

1.	Barchiesi, F., A. L. Colombo, D. A. McGough, and M. G. Rinaldi. 1994. Comparative study of broth macrodilution and microdilution techniques for in vitro antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts by using the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards' proposed standard. J. Clin. Microbiol. 32:2494-2500[Abstract/Free Full Text].
2.	Barry, A. L., and S. D. Brown. 1996. Fluconazole disk diffusion procedure for determining susceptibility of Candida species. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:2154-2157[Abstract].
3.	Chen, S. C. A., M. L. O'Donnell, S. Gordon, and G. L. Gilbert. 1996. Antifungal susceptibility testing using the E-test: comparison with the broth macrodilution technique. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 37:265-273[Abstract/Free Full Text].
4.	Colombo, A. L., F. Barchiesi, D. A. McGough, and M. G. Rinaldi. 1995. Comparison of E-test and National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards broth macrodilution method for azole antifungal susceptibility testing. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:535-540[Abstract].
5.	Dermoumi, H. 1992. In vitro susceptibility of yeast isolates from the blood to fluconazole and amphotericin B. Chemotherapy 38:112-117[Medline].
6.	Espinel-Ingroff, A., G. W. Kish, T. M. Kerkering, R. A. Fromtling, K. Bartizal, J. N. Galgiani, K. Villareal, M. A. Pfaller, T. Gerarden, M. G. Rinaldi, and A. W. Fothergill. 1992. Collaborative comparison of broth macrodilution and microdilution antifungal susceptibility tests. J. Clin. Microbiol. 30:3138-3145[Abstract/Free Full Text].
7.	Fan-Harvard, P., D. Capano, S. M. Smith, A. Mangia, and R. H. Eng. 1991. Development of resistance in Candida isolates from patients receiving prolonged antifungal therapy. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 35:2302-2305[Abstract/Free Full Text].
8.	Fromtling, R. A., J. N. Galgiani, M. Pfaller, A. Espinel-Ingroff, K. F. Bartizal, M. S. Bartlett, B. A. Body, C. Frey, G. Hall, G. D. Roberts, F. B. Nolte, F. C. Odds, M. G. Rinaldi, A. M. Sugar, and K. Villareal. 1993. Multicenter evaluation of a broth macrodilution antifungal susceptibility test for yeasts. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 37:39-45[Abstract/Free Full Text].
9.	Ghannoum, M. A., Y. Fu, A. S. Ibrahim, L. A. Mortara, M. C. Shafiq, J. E. Edwards, Jr., and R. S. Criddle. 1995. In vitro determination of optimal antifungal combinations against Cryptococcus neoformans and Candida albicans. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 39:2459-2465[Abstract].
10.	Ghannoum, M. A., J. H. Rex, and J. N. Galgiani. 1996. Susceptibility testing of fungi: current status of correlation of in vitro data with clinical outcome. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:489-495[Abstract].
11.	Millon, L., A. Manteaux, G. Reboux, C. Drobacheff, M. Monod, T. Barale, and Y. Michel-Briand. 1994. Fluconazole-resistant recurrent oral candidiasis in human immunodeficiency virus-positive patients: persistence of Candida albicans strains with the same genotype. J. Clin. Microbiol. 32:1115-1118[Abstract/Free Full Text].
12.	National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 1997. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts; approved standard. NCCLS document M27-A. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
13.	Patterson, T. F., W. R. Kirkpatrick, S. G. Revankar, R. K. McAtee, A. W. Fothergill, D. I. McCarthy, and M. G. Rinaldi. 1996. Comparative evaluation of macrodilution and chromogenic agar screening for determining fluconazole susceptibility of Candida albicans. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:3237-3239[Abstract].
14.	Patterson, T. F., S. G. Revankar, W. R. Kirkpatrick, O. P. Dib, A. W. Fothergill, S. W. Redding, D. A. Sutton, and M. G. Rinaldi. 1996. Simple method for detecting fluconazole-resistant yeasts with chromogenic agar. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:1794-1797[Abstract].
15.	Pfaller, M. A., and A. L. Barry. 1994. Evaluation of a novel colorimetric broth microdilution method for antifungal susceptibility testing of yeast isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 32:1992-1996[Abstract/Free Full Text].
16.	Pfaller, M. A., and A. L. Barry. 1995. In vitro susceptibilities of clinical yeast isolates to three antifungal agents determined by the microdilution method. Mycopathologia 130:3-9[Medline].
17.	Pfaller, M. A., L. Burmeister, M. A. Bartlett, and M. G. Rinaldi. 1988. Multicenter evaluation of four methods of yeast inoculum preparation. J. Clin. Microbiol. 26:1437-1441[Abstract/Free Full Text].
18.	Revankar, S. G., W. R. Kirkpatrick, R. K. McAtee, O. P. Dib, A. W. Fothergill, S. W. Redding, M. G. Rinaldi, and T. F. Patterson. 1996. Detection and significance of fluconazole resistance in oropharyngeal candidiasis in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. J. Infect. Dis. 174:821-827[Medline].
19.	Rex, J. H., M. A. Pfaller, A. L. Barry, P. W. Nelson, and C. D. Webb. 1995. Antifungal susceptibility testing of isolates from a randomized, multicenter trial of fluconazole versus amphotericin B as treatment of nonneutropenic patients with candidemia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 39:40-44[Abstract].
20.	Rex, J. H., M. A. Pfaller, J. N. Galgiani, M. S. Bartlett, A. Espinel-Ingroff, M. A. Ghannoum, M. Lancaster, F. C. Odds, M. G. Rinaldi, T. J. Walsh, and A. L. Barry. 1997. Development of interpretive breakpoints for antifungal susceptibility testing: conceptual framework and analysis of in vitro-in vivo correlation data for fluconazole, itraconazole, and Candida infections. Clin. Infect. Dis. 24:235-247[Medline].
21.	Rex, J. H., M. A. Pfaller, M. G. Rinaldi, A. Polak, and J. N. Galgiani. 1993. Antifungal susceptibility testing. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 6:367-381[Abstract/Free Full Text].
22.	Rex, J. H., M. G. Rinaldi, and M. A. Pfaller. 1995. Resistance of Candida species to fluconazole. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 39:1-8[Medline].
23.	To, W., A. W. Fothergill, and M. G. Rinaldi. 1995. Comparative evaluation of macrodilution and Alamar colorimetric microdilution broth methods for antifungal susceptibility testing of yeast isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:2660-2664[Abstract].
24.	Troillet, N., C. Durussel, J. Bille, M. P. Glauser, and J. P. Chave. 1993. Correlation between in vitro susceptibility of Candida albicans and fluconazole-resistant oropharyngeal candidiasis in HIV-infected patients. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 12:911-915[Medline].
25.	Turner, T. M., W. R. Kirkpatrick, A. W. Fothergill, D. I. McCarthy, S. W. Redding, O. P. Dib, M. G. Rinaldi, and T. F. Patterson. 1997. Fluconazole disk diffusion susceptibility testing of Candida species, abstr. F-86, p. 274. In Abstracts of the 97th General Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology 1997. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Brown, S., Traczewski, M. (2007). Quality Control Limits for Posaconazole Disk Susceptibility Tests on Mueller-Hinton Agar with Glucose and Methylene Blue. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45: 222-223 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Pfaller, M. A., Hazen, K. C., Messer, S. A., Boyken, L., Tendolkar, S., Hollis, R. J., Diekema, D. J. (2004). Comparison of Results of Fluconazole Disk Diffusion Testing for Candida Species with Results from a Central Reference Laboratory in the ARTEMIS Global Antifungal Surveillance Program. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 3607-3612 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Barry, A., Bille, J., Brown, S., Ellis, D., Meis, J., Pfaller, M., Rennie, R., Rinaldi, M., Rogers, T., Traczewski, M. (2003). Quality Control Limits for Fluconazole Disk Susceptibility Tests on Mueller-Hinton Agar with Glucose and Methylene Blue. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41: 3410-3412 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Rubio, M. C., Gil, J., de Ocariz, I. R., Benito, R., Rezusta, A. (2003). Comparison of Results Obtained by Testing with Three Different Agar Media and by the NCCLS M27-A Method for In Vitro Testing of Fluconazole against Candida spp.. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41: 2665-2668 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Matar, M. J., Ostrosky-Zeichner, L., Paetznick, V. L., Rodriguez, J. R., Chen, E., Rex, J. H. (2003). Correlation between E-Test, Disk Diffusion, and Microdilution Methods for Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Fluconazole and Voriconazole. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47: 1647-1651 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Nelson, S. M., Cartwright, C. P. (2003). Detection of Fluconazole-Resistant Isolates of Candida glabrata by Using an Agar Screen Assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41: 2141-2143 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Pfaller, M. A., Diekema, D. J., Messer, S. A., Boyken, L., Hollis, R. J. (2003). Activities of Fluconazole and Voriconazole against 1,586 Recent Clinical Isolates of Candida Species Determined by Broth Microdilution, Disk Diffusion, and Etest Methods: Report from The ARTEMIS Global Antifungal Susceptibility Program, 2001. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41: 1440-1446 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Hadley, S., Martinez, J. A., McDermott, L., Rapino, B., Snydman, D. R. (2002). Real-time antifungal susceptibility screening aids management of invasive yeast infections in immunocompromised patients. J Antimicrob Chemother 49: 415-419 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Chandrasekar, K., Shyla, J. H., Malathi, R. (2000). Can Antitumor Platinum Compounds Be Effective against Candida albicans?--- A Screening Assay Using Disk Diffusion Method. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38: 3905-3905 [Full Text]  
• Sandven, P. (1999). Detection of Fluconazole-Resistant Candida Strains by a Disc Diffusion Screening Test. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37: 3856-3859 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kirkpatrick, W. R. Articles by Patterson, T. F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kirkpatrick, W. R. Articles by Patterson, T. F.