Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, December 1998, p. 3657-3661, Vol. 36, No. 12
0095-1137/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Rapid Assay for Simultaneous Detection and
Differentiation of Immunoglobulin G Antibodies to Human
Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) Group M, HIV-1 Group O, and
HIV-2
Ana S.
Vallari,*
Robert K.
Hickman,
John R.
Hackett Jr.,
Catherine A.
Brennan,
Vincent A.
Varitek Jr., and
Sushil G.
Devare
AIDS Research and Retrovirus Discovery,
Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, Illinois, 60064-4000
Received 30 June 1998/Returned for modification 23 July
1998/Accepted 15 September 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
A rapid immunodiagnostic test that detects and discriminates human
immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections on the basis of viral type, HIV
type 1 (HIV-1) group M, HIV-1 group O, or HIV-2, was developed. The
rapid assay for the detection of HIV (HIV rapid assay) was designed as
an instrument-free chromatographic immunoassay that detects
immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies to HIV. To assess the performance of
the HIV rapid assay, 470 HIV-positive plasma samples were tested by PCR
and/or Western blotting to confirm the genotype of the infecting virus.
These samples were infected with strains that represented a wide
variety of HIV strains including HIV-1 group M (subtypes A through G),
HIV-1 group O, and HIV-2 (subtypes A and B). The results showed that
the HIV genotype identity established by the rapid assay reliably (469 of 470 samples) correlates with the HIV genotype identity established
by PCR or Western blotting. A total of 879 plasma samples were tested
for IgG to HIV by a licensed enzyme immunoassay (EIA) (470 HIV-positive
samples and 409 HIV-negative samples). When they were tested by the
rapid assay, 469 samples were positive and 410 were negative (99.88% agreement). Twelve seroconversion panels were tested by both the rapid
assay and a licensed EIA. For nine panels identical results were
obtained by the two assays. For the remaining three panels, the rapid
assay was positive one bleed later in comparison to the bleed at which
the EIA was positive. One hundred three urine samples, including 93 urine samples from HIV-seropositive individuals and 10 urine samples
from seronegative individuals, were tested by the rapid assay.
Ninety-one of the ninety-three urine samples from HIV-seropositive
individuals were found to be positive by the rapid assay. There were no
false-positive results (98.05% agreement). Virus in all urine samples
tested were typed as HIV-1 group M. These results suggest that a rapid
assay based on the detection of IgG specific for selected transmembrane
HIV antigens provides a simple and reliable test that is capable of
distinguishing HIV infections on the basis of viral type.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
strains are divided into two distinct types, HIV type 1 (HIV-1) and
HIV-2. Genetic analysis of HIV-1 isolates has revealed that they are
separated into two groups: M (major) and O (outlier). HIV-1 group M
isolates can be further subdivided into 10 different subtypes (subtypes
A to J), while HIV-2 is classified into five subtypes (subtypes A to E)
(21). Although numerous isolates of HIV-1 group O have been characterized, classification of group O viruses into subtypes has not
been established. HIV-1 group M infections predominate worldwide, while
HIV-2 is found primarily in West Africa. Although HIV-1 group O
infection is endemic in west central Africa (Cameroon, Gabon, and
Equatorial Guinea) (12, 14), patients infected with group O
isolates have been identified in Belgium (7), France
(6, 16), Germany (13), Spain (18), and
the United States (25).
HIV serology is characterized in large part by the immune response to
viral proteins (antigens), particularly those comprising the
gag and env regions. For the majority of
commercial diagnostic tests, the main serological target for the
detection of HIV infections is based on antibody reactivity to the
envelope transmembrane protein: gp41 for HIV-1 and gp36 for HIV-2. The
transmembrane protein is highly immunogenic and elicits a strong and
sustained antibody response in individuals infected with HIV.
Antibodies to this protein are among the first to appear at
seroconversion, and the antibody response remains persistent throughout
the course of the disease (1, 22, 28). The majority of the
antibody response to gp41 or gp36 is directed toward the immunodominant region (9-11). Comparisons of the env genes of
gp41 for HIV-1 group M, gp41 for HIV-1 group O, and gp36 for HIV-2 show
up to 50% divergence in amino acid sequences among the genes. As a
consequence of this divergence there is limited serological
cross-reactivity between these env glycoproteins. This may
in part explain why serological assays with HIV-1 group M subtype B
reagents are unable to detect antibodies from some individuals infected
with HIV-1 group O or HIV-2 (27). However, differences in
the serological responses to env proteins would allow one to
discriminate between HIV-1 group M, HIV-1 group O, and HIV-2.
The conventional enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) available for the detection
of antibodies to HIV require instrumentation (i.e., incubators and
mechanical washing and optical reading devices) and generally take 2 to
4 h to produce a result. The need for simpler, faster, less
expensive, and easier-to-perform tests has become more acute as the HIV
pandemic has expanded; thus, a variety of rapid test formats continue
to be evaluated worldwide (20, 26, 30, 31, 33). Rapid tests
for the detection of HIV (HIV rapid tests) which provide results
concurrent with the patient's visit were preferred and resulted in
significant improvement in the delivery of counseling without
increasing the cost or decreasing the effectiveness of testing
(15). In addition, simple, rapid, economical tests for the
diagnosis of HIV infections could improve the safety of the blood
supply worldwide.
In response to this need, a rapid self-performing immunochromatographic
assay for the detection of antibodies to HIV-1 and HIV-2 was developed.
This instrument-free assay is performed at room temperature and
produces results in 5 min. The unique feature of this rapid assay is
its ability to determine whether an individual is infected with HIV-1
group M, HIV-1 group O, or HIV-2. Discrimination between the viral
types would prove to be useful in epidemiological studies, when
choosing antiviral therapy, or when counseling a patient on disease progression.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
HIV antigens.
Three recombinant proteins derived
from the env regions of HIV-1 group M, HIV-1 group O, or
HIV-2 were expressed in Escherichia coli as fusion proteins
with CTP:CMP-3-deoxy-D-manno-octulosonate cytidylyltransferase (CKS) (24). These antigens were
extracted and purified by standard protocols for the production of
recombinant proteins in E. coli (29). The HIV-1
group M env construct was derived from subtype B isolate
HXB2R (21) and comprises the carboxy-terminal 42 amino acids
of gp120 (residues 477 to 518) and the amino-terminal 185 amino acids
of gp41 (residues 1 to 155 and 194 to 223) fused to CKS. The HIV-1
group O env construct was derived from the group O isolate
HAM112 and comprises the carboxy-terminal 45 amino acids of gp120
(residues 476 to 520) and the amino-terminal 199 amino acids of gp41
(residues 1 to 169 and 196 to 225) (11a). The HIV-2
env construct was derived from subtype A isolate D194
(21) and comprises the carboxy-terminal 60 amino acids of
gp105 (residues 432 to 491) and the amino-terminal 159 amino acids of
gp36 (residues 1 to 159).
Colloidal selenium-antibody conjugates.
A selenium colloid
suspension (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, Ill.) was concentrated to
an absorbance of 25 optical density units (wavelength scan, 400 to 800 nm) in distilled water. MOPS [3-(N-morpholino)propanesulfonic acid] was added to the
selenium colloid suspension at a final concentration of 10 mM (pH 7.4). Affinity-purified goat anti-human immunoglobulin G (IgG; Fc specific) antibodies (Jackson Immuno Research Laboratories, Inc., West Grove, Pa.) were diluted in 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) to a concentration of 0.75 mg/ml. The diluted antibody was added to the selenium colloid
suspension to achieve a final antibody concentration of 75 µg/ml. The
mixture was stirred for 40 min at room temperature. Bovine serum
albumin (11% [wt/vol] in 10 mM MOPS [pH 7.4]) was added to a final
concentration of 1% (vol/vol), and the selenium colloid-antibody
conjugate solution was stirred for an additional 15 min, followed by
centrifugation at 5,000 × g for 90 min. After centrifugation, 90% of the supernatant was removed and the pellet was
resuspended with the remaining supernatant.
The conjugate pad is a resin-bonded glass fiber material (Lydal, Inc.,
Rochester, N.H.) that is immersion coated in selenium colloid-anti-IgG
conjugate and then dried with hot air. A glass fiber material that is
not coated with the selenium colloid-anti-IgG conjugate is used as the
sample application pad.
Preparation of material for chromatography.
All antigens
were applied to a nitrocellulose membrane (Schleicher & Schuell, Keene,
N.H.) by charge and deflect reagent jetting (Abbott Laboratories). HIV
recombinant proteins were diluted to a concentration of 0.5 to 1 mg/ml
in jetting diluent (100 mM Tris [pH 7.6] with 1% [wt/vol] sucrose,
0.9% [wt/vol] NaCl, and 5 µg of fluorescein per ml) and jetted at
a band width of 0.5 mm onto the nitrocellulose membrane strip as three
discrete zones (lines perpendicular to the direction of the fluid
flow). The jetted nitrocellulose, blotter pad, conjugate pad, and
sample application pad components are manually assembled and held
permanently in place with a Mylar film laminating material. The
laminate is then cut into individual 7.5-mm strips and placed in
plastic housing sticks for final assembly (Fig.
1).

View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
HIV rapid assay format. Three recombinant envelope
antigens are jetted separately onto distinct areas of a nitrocellulose
strip. The assembly also includes a glass fiber conjugate pad
containing colloidal selenium coated with goat anti-human IgG. The
entire assembly including the conjugate sample application pad and
blotter pad are held together by clear laminating Mylar film.
|
|
Assay procedure.
Serum or plasma (1 µl) and five drops
(100 µl) of sample elution buffer are applied to the sample well of
the HIV rapid test stick. For testing of urine, 50 µl of sample and
50 µl of sample elution buffer are used. The sample and buffer are
allowed to diffuse through the application pad and migrate past the
result window. As the anti-IgG-coated selenium-anti-HIV complexes
flow, they pass over discrete zones, each of which contains a
recombinant antigen. Complexes containing HIV-specific antibodies bind
to recombinant antigens immobilized on the nitrocellulose strip, resulting in a red color at the capture bar. When the end-of-test window turns red (about 5 min), the assay is completed.
Serum, plasma, and urine specimens.
The serum and plasma
samples (n = 470) included in the study were obtained
from Cameroon, Uganda, Brazil, Thailand, Côte d'Ivoire,
Equatorial Guinea, France, Spain, the United States, and Germany. HIV-1
seroconversion panels were purchased from Boston Biomedica, Inc. (West
Bridgewater, Mass.) and NABI (Boca Raton, Fla.). Matched plasma and
urine samples (n = 103) were purchased from Research
Sample Bank (Pompano Beach, Fla.) or were from healthy donors (Abbott
Laboratories). The samples were tested for antibodies to HIV-1 or HIV-2
by commercially available assays; either an HIV-1 lysate EIA (3A11;
Abbott Laboratories) or an HIV-1 and HIV-2 recombinant antigen sandwich
EIA (3A77; Abbott Laboratories).
Positive controls consisted of two HIV-1 group M-, two HIV-1 group O-,
and two HIV-2-infected serum or plasma samples. Two
uninfected serum
samples were included as part of the control
panel. This control panel
was used to test all batches of strips
prepared as part of an internal
quality control. HIV-1-positive
samples were confirmed by Western
blotting (Cambridge Biotech,
Worcester, Mass.) or by sequence analysis
after PCR amplification.
HIV isolates were subtyped on the basis of
phylogenetic analysis
of PCR-amplified gp41 sequences (
2,
4). Samples positive
for HIV-2 were confirmed to be positive by a
Western blot assay
for HIV-2 (Sanofi-Pasteur) and/or sequence analysis
after PCR
amplification (
3).
Assignment of virus type.
Results of the rapid assay were
recorded when the sample chromatographed past the end-of-test window
(approximately 5 min). Unequivocal results were obtained in most cases
when a single line of reactivity developed at the site of the target
antigen. For samples showing more than one line of reactivity, the
capture bar showing the highest intensity was used as the basis for
assignment of the viral type.
 |
RESULTS |
A control panel of serum or plasma samples known to be positive
for HIV-1 group M subtype B, HIV-1 group O, and HIV-2 was used to
demonstrate the ability of the HIV rapid assay to detect and
discriminate antibodies to HIV, as shown in Fig.
2. Positive test results were usually
interpretable within 2 min. However, final test results were not
recorded until 5 min had passed to allow the colloidal selenium
particles to completely migrate past the immobilized HIV antigens in
the test result window. This additional time was necessary for the
detection of weakly reactive samples by allowing excess selenium
conjugate to fully migrate to the end-of-test window. Samples
nonreactive at 5 min were interpreted as negative. In most cases only
one antigen was reactive; thus, the test result was definitive in
determining whether an individual was infected with either HIV-1 group
M, HIV-1 group O, or HIV-2. However, some samples showed various
degrees of serological cross-reactivity with the env
antigens. When such cross-reactivities were observed, they occurred
between the HIV-1 group M and HIV-1 group O antigens. No
cross-reactions between HIV-1 group M and HIV-2 were observed. Despite
some cross-reactivity, the type of virus present in the infected
individual could still be determined on the basis of preferential
immunoreactivity to the respective env antigen; i.e., the
relative intensity of the signal was the basis for determining the
viral type.

View larger version (86K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Results of HIV rapid assay for control serum panel. Lane
1, negative control; lane 2, HIV-1 group O-positive control; lane 3, HIV-1 group M-positive control; lane 4, HIV-2-positive control.
|
|
A total of 470 plasma samples from HIV-infected individuals were tested
by the HIV rapid assay. These samples were obtained from various
geographical regions of the world including Cameroon (n = 111), Equatorial Guinea (n = 8), Uganda
(n = 65), Brazil (n = 50), Thailand
(n = 107), Côte d'Ivoire (n = 117), France (n = 5), Spain (n = 4), the United States (n = 2), and Germany (n = 1). All 470 samples were seropositive by one or
more commercial HIV screening assays. The results for all HIV-positive
samples were subsequently confirmed by either Western blotting or PCR amplification. Subtype determinations were based on phylogenetic analysis of PCR-amplified sequences from gp41 (HIV-1) or gp36 (HIV-2).
The HIV rapid assay detected and discriminated the viral types in all
HIV-1-seropositive specimens (Table 1),
including 319 specimens positive for HIV-1 group M isolates
representing subtypes A to G (Table 2)
and 29 specimens positive for HIV-1 group O isolates. The rapid HIV
assay detected and discriminated as HIV-2 infections 117 of 118 HIV-2-antibody positive specimens with subtypes A and B represented
(Table 1 and Table 2). For two samples the intensities were equivalent
for both the HIV-1 group M and HIV-2 antigens, and the samples were
interpreted as having dual infections. Only HIV-1 nucleic acid
sequences were detected by PCR amplification. These two samples were
subsequently tested for the presence of antibodies to HIV-2 by an
HIV-2-specific Western blotting assay and a synthetic peptide EIA that
discriminates HIV-1 from HIV-2. Both samples were reactive by Western
blotting and with the type-specific immunodominant region peptide from gp36, indicating infection with HIV-2 (data not shown). One sample confirmed to be positive for HIV-2 was negative by the HIV rapid assay.
This HIV-2-positive sample was weakly reactive in a commercial recombinant HIV-1 and HIV-2 sandwich assay.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1.
Detection and differentiation of HIV in HIV
antibody-positive plasma samplesa from
various geographical locations by the HIV rapid assay
|
|
A collection of plasma samples from Equatorial Guinea and Cameroon
(n = 409) seronegative for HIV by EIA was obtained for testing. All of the samples were also seronegative by the rapid assay.
The specificity of the rapid assay, based on the total number of
negative samples tested, was 100%.
To determine the sensitivity of the HIV rapid assay during
seroconversion, HIV-1 seroconversion panels were tested. The results are presented in Table 3. The rapid assay
was as sensitive as a third-generation HIV-1 and HIV-2 recombinant
antigen sandwich EIA for 9 of the 12 panels tested. For the three
remaining panels, the rapid assay was positive one bleed later than the
bleed with which the sandwich EIA was positive. No seroconversion
panels positive for HIV-1 group O or HIV-2 were tested.
Testing was performed with 103 matched plasma and urine specimens
collected in the United States. Ninety-three of the plasma samples were
EIA positive and were confirmed to be positive by Western blotting. The
remaining 10 samples were EIA negative. The rapid assay detected 100%
(93 of 93) of the plasma specimens positive by EIA. The 10 negative
plasma specimens were also negative by the rapid assay. When the
matched urine samples from the EIA-positive individuals were tested, 91 of 93 were found to be positive. All 10 EIA-negative samples were also
negative by the rapid assay. Thus, the overall sensitivity of the rapid
assay was 97.89% (91 of 93) for urine samples. All urine samples were
typed as HIV group M by the rapid assay.
 |
DISCUSSION |
We have developed a highly specific and sensitive rapid
assay which detects and discriminates between HIV-1 group M, HIV-1 group O, and HIV-2. This assay can be used to evaluate quickly and
inexpensively large numbers of samples even in the most difficult of
testing environments. Discrimination between the virus types is
important for epidemiological studies to track prevalence and/or changes in the epidemic. In addition, discrimination of HIV-1- from
HIV-2-infected individuals is important due to the biological and
pathological differences between these viruses; HIV-2 has lower rates
of viral transmission and disease progression than HIV-1
(17). The identification of HIV-1 group O from HIV-1 group M
may affect the choice of drug therapy due to the natural resistance of
HIV-1 group O to nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (8).
Identification of all HIV-infected individuals continues to be the
major emphasis in serological detection. Due to the extensive genetic
variation and antigenic diversity of HIV isolates (21), immunoassays for HIV must have the capability to detect a wide spectrum
of divergent strains. With this in mind, the HIV rapid assay was used
to screen a wide variety of genotyped HIV strains in specimens from
various geographical regions (2-4). The rapid test showed
broad specificity in accurately detecting HIV-1 group M seropositive
specimens regardless of subtype, in addition to detecting HIV-1 group O
and HIV-2 infections. Although the overall sensitivity was high (469 of
470; 99.79%), one HIV-2-positive sample was negative by the HIV rapid
assay. This sample may have been from a patient in the process of
seroconversion or may have had a low antibody titer, as shown by a low
signal-to-cutoff ratio when tested by a commercial HIV EIA (data not shown).
Twelve HIV-1 seroconversion panels were tested to examine
the sensitivity of the rapid test for the detection of HIV infections during seroconversion. A third-generation EIA for HIV-1 and HIV-2 was
used as the reference test. The rapid assay detected HIV antibody on
the same day that the reference test detected HIV antibody for 9 of 12 panels tested. Of the remaining three panels, the rapid test was
positive one bleed later than the third-generation EIA. This sandwich
EIA can simultaneously detect IgG and IgM antibodies to HIV-1 and HIV-2
in samples from infected individuals, whereas the rapid assay uses only
an anti-IgG conjugate. The lack of IgM detection may account, at least
in part, for the difference in sensitivity between the two tests. In
addition, the seroconversion panel members missed by the rapid assay
were predominantly reactive with p24 when they were examined by Western
blotting (data not shown). The third-generation EIA used in the present
study has the capability of detecting anti-p24 antibodies, whereas the
rapid assay does not. Thus, the lack of anti-p24 detection by the rapid assay may result in a lower sensitivity for HIV detection during seroconversion in some cases. The sensitivity of the rapid assay for
the detection of HIV during seroconversion is close but not equivalent
to that of the third-generation EIA.
The utility of the rapid assay for the detection of HIV antibodies from
specimens that can be obtained by noninvasive means was also examined.
The overall rate of detection with urine samples was 97.85%, in
contrast to a 100% rate of detection for the matched plasma samples.
The observed differences in sensitivity are likely due to the
relatively lower concentrations of anti-HIV antibodies in urine in
comparison to the levels in serum or plasma (5). Further
studies with additional samples are needed for a more accurate
determination of the sensitivity of the rapid assay with this type of specimen.
On-site rapid testing for HIV provides an inexpensive and effective
method of determining the HIV serological status of an individual. As
such, rapid screening tests can be a valuable alternative to testing by
EIA especially in areas with a high prevalence of individuals infected
with HIV. These areas are often in resource-poor and/or rural settings,
where access to HIV testing is minimal. In these settings, the use of a
rapid assay for the detection of HIV would provide immediate test
results and would facilitate result-specific counseling on the day of
the initial visit. To date, most individuals infected with either HIV-1
group O or HIV-2 have originated from or were connected to west central
Africa. However, immigration and travel have resulted in the spread of these viruses to new geographical regions. The ability of the rapid
assay to discriminate the viral type provides an excellent tool for
epidemiological studies designed to monitor the spread of HIV-1 group O
or HIV-2.
Rapid tests that detect antibodies to HIV have not traditionally been
used to screen specimens in clinical settings. Simple and rapid test
methods may provide an acceptable alternative if their sensitivities
and specificities are comparable to those of the standard EIAs. Most
commercial EIAs detect but do not discriminate between HIV-1 group M,
HIV-1 group O, and HIV-2. Competitive immunoblotting assays
(32), peptide immunoassays (23), and
peptide-blocking EIAs (19) are among a few tests used to
differentiate HIV isolates serologically, but these type of assays
require significant amounts of equipment, time, and expertise to
achieve a result.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank the following for providing specimens: Lutz
Gürtler, Max von Pettenkofer Institute of Hygiene and Medical
Microbiology, Munich, Germany; Brooks Jackson, Department of Pathology,
Johns Hopkins Medical Institute, Baltimore, Md.; Lazare Kaptué
and Leopold Zekeng, National AIDS Control Programme, Ministry of
Health, Yaoundé, Cameroon; Mark Rayfield, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Ga.; Vicente Soriano, Ministerio de
Sanidad y Consumo, Instituto de Salud Carlos III-Insalud, Madrid,
Spain; and Amilcar Tanuri, Departamento de Genetica, Instituto de
Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Abbott
Laboratories, Dept. 9 NG, 1401 Sheridan Rd., N. Chicago IL, 60064-4000. Phone: (847) 938-8931. Fax: (847) 937-1401. E-mail:
ana.vallari{at}add.ssw.abbott.com.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Barin, F.,
M. F. McLane,
J. S. Allan,
T. H. Lee,
J. E. Groopman, and M. Essex.
1985.
Virus envelope protein of HTLV-III represents major target antigen for antibodies in AIDS patients.
Science
228:1094-1096[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Brennan, C. A.,
J. K. Lund,
A. Golden,
J. Yamaguchi,
A. Vallari,
J. Phillips,
P. K. Kataaha,
J. B. Jackson, and S. Devare.
1997.
Serologic and phylogenic characterization of HIV-1 subtypes in Uganda.
AIDS
11:1823-1832[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Brennan, C. A.,
J. Yamaguchi,
A. S. Vallari,
R. K. Hickman, and S. G. Devare.
1997.
Genetic variation in human immunodeficiency virus type 2: identification of a unique variant from human plasma.
AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses
13:401-404[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Brennan, C. A.,
J. Hackett, Jr.,
L. Zekeng,
J. K. Lund,
A. S. Vallari,
R. K. Hickman,
L. Gürtler,
L. Kaptué,
J. von Overbeck,
H. Hampl, and S. G. Devare.
1997.
Sequence of gp41env immunodominant region of HIV type 1 group O from West Central Africa.
AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses
13:901-904[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Cao, Y.,
B. Hosein,
W. Borkowsky,
M. Mirabile,
L. Baker,
D. Baldwin,
B. Poiesz, and A. Friedman-Kein.
1989.
Antibodies to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in the urine specimens of HIV-1 seropositive individuals.
AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses
5:311-319[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Charneau, P.,
A. M. Borman,
C. Quillent,
D. Guetard,
S. Chamaret,
J. Cohen,
G. Remy,
L. Montagnier, and F. Clavel.
1994.
Isolation and envelope sequence of a highly divergent HIV-1 isolate: definition of a new HIV-1 group.
Virology
205:247-253[Medline].
|
| 7.
|
De Leys, R.,
B. Vanderborght,
M. B. Haesevelde,
L. Heyndrickx,
A. Van Geel,
C. Wauters,
R. Bernaerts,
E. Saman,
P. Nijs,
B. Willems,
H. Taelman,
G. Van der Groen,
P. Piot,
T. Tersmette,
J. G. Huisman, and H. Van Heuverswyn.
1990.
Isolation and partial characterization of an unusual human immunodeficiency retrovirus from two persons of west-central African origin.
J. Virol.
64:1207-1216[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Descamps, D.,
G. Collin,
I. Loussert-Ajaka,
S. Saragosti,
F. Simon, and F. Brun-Vezinet.
1995.
HIV-1 group O sensitivity to antiretroviral drugs.
AIDS
9:977-978.
|
| 9.
|
Gnann, J. W.,
P. L. Schwimmbeck,
J. A. Nelson,
A. B. Traux, and M. B. A. Oldstone.
1987.
Diagnosis of AIDS using a 12-amino acid peptide representing an immunodominant epitope of the human immunodeficiency virus.
J. Infect. Dis.
156:261-267[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Gnann, J. W.,
J. A. Nelson, and M. B. A. Oldstone.
1987.
Fine mapping of the immunodominant domain in the transmembrane glycoprotein of human immunodeficiency virus.
J. Virol.
61:2639-2641[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Gnann, J. W., Jr.,
J. B. McCormick,
S. Mitchell,
J. A. Nelson, and M. B. A. Oldstone.
1987.
Synthetic peptide immunoassay distinguishes HIV type 1 and HIV type 2 infections.
Science
237:1346-1349[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11a.
| Gürtler, L. G. Unpublished data.
|
| 12.
|
Gürtler, L. G.,
P. H. Hauser,
J. Eberle,
A. von Brunn,
S. Knapp,
L. Zekeng,
J. M. Tsaque, and L. Kaptué.
1994.
A new subtype of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (MVP5180) from Cameroon.
J. Virol.
68:1581-1585[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Hampl, H.,
D. Sawitzsky,
M. Stöffler-Meilicke,
A. Groh,
A. Schmitt,
J. Eberle, and L. Gürtler.
1995.
First case of HIV-1 subtype O in Germany.
Infection
34:369-370.
|
| 14.
|
Hunt, J. C.,
A. M. Golden,
J. K. Lund,
L. Gürtler,
L. Zekeng,
J. Obiang,
L. Kaptué,
H. Hampl,
A. Vallari, and S. G. Devare.
1997.
Envelope sequence variability and serological characterization of HIV-1 group O isolates from Equatorial Guinea.
AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses
13:901-904.
|
| 15.
|
Kassler, W. J.,
B. Dillon,
C. Haley,
W. K. Jones, and A. Goldman.
1997.
On-site, rapid HIV testing with same day results and counseling.
AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses
11:1045-1051.
|
| 16.
|
Loussert-Ajaka, I.,
M. L. Chaix,
B. Korber,
F. Letourneur,
E. Gomas,
E. Allen,
T. D. Ly,
F. Brun-Vézinet,
F. Simon, and S. Saragosti.
1995.
Variability of HIV type 1 group O strains isolated from Cameroonian patients living in France.
J. Virol.
69:5640-5649[Abstract].
|
| 17.
|
Markovitz, D. M.
1993.
Infection with the human immunodeficiency virus type 2.
Ann. Intern. Med.
118:211-218[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Mas, A.,
M. E. Quiñones-Mateu,
V. Soriano, and E. Domingo.
1996.
Env gene characterization of the first HIV type 1 group O Spanish isolate.
AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses
12:1647-1649[Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Mauclère, P.,
F. Damond,
C. Apetrei,
I. Loussert-Ajaka,
S. Souquières,
L. Buzelay,
P. Dalbon,
M. Jolivet,
M. M. Lobe,
F. Brun-Vezinet,
F. Simon, and F. Barin.
1997.
Synthetic peptide ELISA's for detection of and discrimination between group M and group O HIV type 1 infection.
AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses
12:987-993.
|
| 20.
| McKenna, S. L., G. K. Muyinda, D. Roth, M. Mwali, N. Ng'andu, A. Myrick, C. Luo, F. H. Priddy, V. M. Hall, A. A. von Lieven, J. R. Sabatino, K. Mark, and S. A. Allen. 1997. Rapid HIV testing and counseling for voluntary
testing centers in Africa. AIDS 11(Suppl.
1):S103-S110.
|
| 21.
|
Meyers, G.,
B. Korber,
B. H. Hahn,
K. T. Jeang,
J. W. Mellors,
F. E. McCutchan,
L. E. Henderson, and G. N. Pavlakin.
1995.
Human retroviruses and AIDS. Theoretical biology and biophysics.
Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, N.M.
|
| 22.
|
Montagnier, L.,
F. Clavel,
B. Krust,
S. Chamaret,
F. Rey,
F. Barre-Sinoussi, and J. C. Chermann.
1985.
Identification and antigenicity of the major envelope glycoprotein of lymphadenopathy-associated virus.
Virology
144:283-289[Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Pau, C.,
M. Kai,
D. Holloman-Candal,
C. Luo,
M. Kalish,
G. Schochetman,
B. Byers,
R. George, and the WHO Network for HIV Isolation and Characterization.
1994.
Antigenic variation and serotyping of HIV type 1 from four World Health Organization-sponsored HIV vaccine sites.
AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses
11:1369-1377.
|
| 24.
|
Pilot-Matias, T. J.,
A. S. Muerhoff,
J. N. Simons,
T. P. Leary,
S. L. Buijk,
M. L. Chalmers,
J. C. Erker,
G. J. Dawson,
S. M. Desai, and I. K. Mushawar.
1996.
Identification of antigenic regions in the GB hepatitis viruses GBV-A, GBV-B and GBV-C.
J. Med. Virol.
48:329-338[Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Rayfield, M.,
P. Sullivan,
C. I. Bandea,
L. Britvan,
R. A. Otten,
C. P. Pau,
D. Pieniazek,
S. Subbarao,
P. Simon,
C. A. Schable,
A. C. Wright,
J. Ward, and G. Schochetman.
1996.
HIV-1 group O virus identified for the first time in the United States.
Emerg. Infect. Dis.
2:209-212[Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Sardana, V. N., and P. J. Brenny.
1994.
The cost benefit of HIV screening in India, abstr PCO587, p. 300.
In
Abstracts of the 10th International Conference on AIDS.
|
| 27.
|
Schable, C.,
L. Zekeng,
C. P. Pau,
L. Kaptué,
L. Gürtler,
T. Dondero,
J. M. Tsague,
G. Schochetman,
H. Jaffe, and H. George.
1994.
Sensitivity of United States HIV antibody tests for detection of HIV-1 group O infections.
Lancet
344:1333-1334[Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Schulz, T. F.,
J. M. Aschauer,
P. Hengster,
C. Larcher,
H. Wachter,
B. Fleckenstein, and M. P. Dierich.
1986.
Envelope gene-derived recombinant peptide in the serodiagnosis of human immunodeficiency virus infection.
Lancet
ii:111-112.
|
| 29.
|
Seetharam, R., and S. K. Sharma (ed.).
1991.
Purification and analysis of recombinant proteins.
Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, N.Y.
|
| 30.
|
Stetler, H. C.,
R. Meza,
T. C. Granade,
S. K. Phillips,
C. Nunez,
L. Amador,
J. R. George, and S. Terrell.
1995.
Honduras field evaluation of the WHO HIV alternative testing strategies, p. 121.
In
2nd National Conference on Human Retroviruses and Related Infections.
|
| 31.
|
Torimiro, J. N.,
F. A. Ashu,
V. E. Lobe, and P. M. Ndumbe.
1994.
Testing pooled sera for HIV antibodies, abstr. PBO436, p. 252.
In
Abstracts of the 10th International Conference on AIDS.
|
| 32.
|
Van Binsbergen, J.,
D. de Rijk,
H. Pells,
C. Dries,
J. Scherders,
M. Koolen,
L. Zekeng, and L. G. Gürtler.
1996.
Evaluation of a new third generation anti-HIV-1/anti-HIV-2 assay with increased sensitivity for HIV-1 group O.
J. Virol. Methods
60:131-137[Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Zubairi, S. Q., and M. Canlas.
1993.
Comparison of SUDS HIV-1 with ELISA and Western, p. 87.
In
1st National Natl. Conference on Human Retroviruses and Related Infections.
|
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, December 1998, p. 3657-3661, Vol. 36, No. 12
0095-1137/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Gupta, A., Chaudhary, V. K.
(2003). Whole-Blood Agglutination Assay for On-Site Detection of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection. J. Clin. Microbiol.
41: 2814-2821
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Aidoo, S., Ampofo, W. K., Brandful, J. A. M., Nuvor, S. V., Ansah, J. K., Nii-Trebi, N., Barnor, J. S., Apeagyei, F., Sata, T., Ofori-Adjei, D., Ishikawa, K.
(2001). Suitability of a Rapid Immunochromatographic Test for Detection of Antibodies to Human Immunodeficiency Virus in Ghana, West Africa. J. Clin. Microbiol.
39: 2572-2575
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Peralta, L., Constantine, N., Griffin Deeds, B., Martin, L., Ghalib, K.
(2001). Evaluation of Youth Preferences for Rapid and Innovative Human Immunodeficiency Virus Antibody Tests. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med
155: 838-843
[Abstract]
[Full Text]