Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, February 1998, p. 557-562, Vol. 36, No. 2
Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and
Geographic Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford,
California 943051;
California Institute
for Medical Research2 and
Department of
Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases,3
Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, San Jose, California 95128;
Microbiology Institute, A.O. "Ospedali Riuniti di
Bergamo," Bergamo 24128, Italy4; and
Department of Microbiology, Duke University Medical Center,
Durham, North Carolina 277105
Received 29 May 1997/Returned for modification 28 July
1997/Accepted 31 October 1997
Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a ubiquitous, ascomycetous
yeast, and vaginitis caused by this organism has been reported only very rarely. The aim of the present investigation was to assess the
epidemiological relatedness of a group of vaginal and commercial S. cerevisiae isolates by a previously reported genetic
typing method, which divided the isolates into two broad groups with numerous subtypes. Nineteen S. cerevisiae isolates obtained
from patients suffering from vaginitis and four isolates from
commercial products in the same city were analyzed. The cellular DNA
from each isolate was digested with the restriction endonuclease
EcoRI, and restriction fragment length polymorphisms were
generated by horizontal gel electrophoresis. The results showed that
although vaginal isolates did not cluster in any particular genetic
subtype, multiple patients were infected with indistinguishable strains (there were nine distinct strains among 23 isolates). For two of three
patients, all three with two episodes of S. cerevisiae vaginitis, different strains were isolated during the recurrence of
this disease. Three other patients with indistinguishable isolates were
epidemiologically related in that two were practitioners in the same
clinic and the third was a patient at this clinic. We also found that
one commercial strain was indistinguishable from the strain isolated
from three different women at the time that they were suffering from
vaginitis. The findings of the present study suggest that some S. cerevisiae strains may possess properties permitting persistence
in the human host. Furthermore, person-to-person contact and the
proliferation of the use of S. cerevisiae as a health-food
product, in home baking, and in home brewing may be a contributing
factor in human colonization and infection with this organism.
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
is a ubiquitous, ascomycetous yeast which has been used in the
preparation of food and drink for centuries and is commonly considered
to be nonpathogenic. However, in the past several years this organism
has been noted to be a human pathogen, particularly in
immunocompromised patients (2, 9, 15, 17). Vaginitis caused
by Saccharomyces species has been reported only rarely
(10, 15, 19). The incidence of vaginitis in which this
organism is the etiological agent has been estimated to be less than
1% (11).
In a review of nine patients with vaginitis caused by S. cerevisiae, Sobel et al. (15) found that this condition
was indistinguishable from the vulvovaginitis caused by the more
commonly identified fungal pathogens belonging to the genus
Candida. Those investigators reported that S. cerevisiae vaginitis, although rare, tended to develop as part of
a chronic syndrome as a result of local and systemic predisposing
factors and that management of this condition was problematic
(15). Recent investigations have assessed the pathogenicity
of clinical and nonclinical isolates of this organism in an attempt to
elucidate the mechanisms by which this organism causes disease (1,
3, 4, 6, 7). These investigators have reported that certain
phenotypic traits are more often associated with increased virulence,
in particular, an ability to grow at 42°C, an increase in the
production of pseudohyphae, and possibly, a tendency to produce
multiple colony phenotypes (3, 7). Hence, there would appear
to be a role for host factors as well as factors related to the
organism in the pathogenesis of human disease caused by S. cerevisiae.
A recent study (5) used DNA typing methods to characterize
60 clinical and nonclinical isolates of S. cerevisiae. Those investigators devised a genetic typing method to subgroup these isolates into groups A and B on the basis of the presence or absence of
a 3.0-kb band on agarose gel electrophoresis of
EcoRI-digested DNA. Twenty-four of these isolates previously
had been characterized for their degree of virulence in a murine model
of systemic infection (4). Those investigators
(5) reported that clinical isolates were very heterogeneous,
exhibiting little clonality, that there was a statistical association
of virulence with the group A DNA type, and that it was significantly
more probable that vaginal isolates were of the group B DNA type.
The aim of the present investigation was to assess the epidemiological
relatedness of a group of vaginal and commercial S. cerevisiae isolates by a previously reported genetic typing method and to test the putative association (5) of vaginal isolates with the group B genotype.
Isolates of S. cerevisiae were collected at the
Genital Tract Infectious Disease Clinic at the Microbiology Institute,
A. O. Ospedali Riuniti di Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy, during a
16-month period from December 1994 to March 1996. Throughout this
period 4,943 patients were treated for vaginitis at this clinic.
At the time of isolation, the treating clinician completed a pro forma
record for the assessment of relevant social, clinical, and laboratory
information. This information included the patient's age, current
symptomatology, previous history and frequency of occurrence of
gynecological disease, other related medical history, social history,
whether or not yeast products were used in the home or at work, and
laboratory findings.
A total of 19 isolates of S. cerevisiae were recovered from
the vaginas of patients suffering from vaginitis. All isolates were
identified by the API 20C (bioMerieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France) system
as S. cerevisiae with greater than 99% certainty. Each instance of isolation was of a pure culture of S. cerevisiae
with 5 to 10 individual colonies randomly assessed and defined to the species level. For each isolation, no other organisms of known virulence in the vagina were isolated (i.e., other yeast,
Gardnerella vaginalis, Mobiluncus spp.,
Trichomonas vaginalis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and
Chlamydia trachomatis), even though the isolation of these organisms was vigorously sought.
Four additional isolates which were obtained from commercial
preparations of yeasts were included in the study. These commercial isolates were obtained during the same time that the study was being
conducted and were from the same region (Bergamo, Italy). All isolates
were sent in a dried state to the California Institute for Medical
Research, San Jose, Calif., where they were regrown for further
analysis.
Standard yeast genetic techniques were used to assess spore viability
and to test for species; i.e., mating-competent spores of segregants of
clinical isolates were able to mate with laboratory S. cerevisiae strains (14). These hybrids were able to
sporulate and, when dissected, yielded good spore viability and
underwent meiotic recombination (5, 6, 7, 14). The ratio of
segregants that fermented galactose, maltose, and raffinose and that
grew on minimal medium also was assessed. The isolates were typed by morphological methods, including by the color reaction (12) and colony morphology (16). All isolates were of the rough, opaque type; two subtypes were found.
Cellular DNA was isolated by previously described methods (5,
13). Approximately 3 µg of the resultant DNA was digested with
20 U of the restriction endonuclease EcoRI for 6 h at
37°C. The DNA fragments were separated through a 0.7% (wt/vol)
agarose gel in TAE buffer (40 mM Tris-acetate, 0.2 mM EDTA [pH 8.3])
for 20 h at 2 V/cm and were visualized by UV transillumination
after ethidium bromide staining.
Digital images of the resultant DNA restriction fragment length
polymorphisms (RFLPs) were captured with a charge-coupled device camera
via the BioImage AQ gel documentation system (BioImage, Ann Arbor,
Mich.). These images were analyzed by the BioImage AQ software, and the
resultant band patterns for each of the 23 strains were matched for
percent similarities by the Dice method with a 2% interband tolerance.
Dendrograms were generated from this analysis by the unweighted
pair-group method with arithmetic averages (UPGMA) (8).
Furthermore, digital images were captured from Polaroid photographs of
the DNA RFLPs from the previous study (5) and were analyzed
in the same manner to compare the similarity of the strains in the
current study with those analyzed previously. From this analysis,
strains with a level of similarity of >95% were considered to be the
same and their EcoRI-digested cellular DNAs were
electrophoresed side by side on the same agarose gel to confirm their
identities. Those strains with <95% similarity by this methodology
were considered unique.
Statistical analyses in this study used the chi-square test, and
differences between groups were assumed to be significant when the
probability (P) was less than or equal to 0.05.
Clinical correlations.
S. cerevisiae was isolated from
0.4% (19 of 4,943) of the samples taken from patients who were
suffering from vaginitis and who presented to the Genital Tract
Infectious Disease Clinic during the experimental period. As outlined
in Materials and Methods, a number of individual colonies (5 to 10 colonies) were randomly assessed for each sample and were identified to
the species level; in no instance were other vaginal pathogens
isolated. Yeasts were cultivated from 575 (12%) of these 4,943 samples; therefore, S. cerevisiae was isolated 3% (19 of
575) of the time from yeast-positive samples. None of the patients from
whom non-S. cerevisiae yeasts were isolated had S. cerevisiae-positive cultures.
0095-1137/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Epidemiological Investigation of Vaginal
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Isolates by a Genotypic
Method
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References
TABLE 1.
Clinical data and yeast intake of patients from whom the
23 S. cerevisiae isolates were isolated
Molecular typing. The isolates were placed into genotypic subtypes according to previously published criteria (5). This method separates isolates of S. cerevisiae into two large groups distinguished by the presence or absence of a DNA RFLP band of approximately 3.0 kb (5). Those isolates without the 3.0-kb band were designated group A (52%; 12 of 23), and those with the 3.0-kb band were designated group B (48%; 11 of 23). The RFLPs of EcoRI-digested DNA of a representative sample of strains is shown in Fig. 1, which indicates the 3.0-kb band used to differentiate between groups A and B. This genotypic method of strain differentiation was used because previous results generated by this method had indicated that a disproportionate number of vaginal isolates were of the B genotypic subgroup (5).
|
Test for spore viability and identification to the species
level.
Test for sporulation of the 23 S. cerevisiae
isolates studied showed that most strains produced spores, although the
viabilities of these spores varied (Table
2). Viable spores were produced by 10 (type Av) of the 12 type A isolates, whereas 6 (type
Bv) of the 11 type B isolates produced viable spores. There
was no significant difference in the proportion of type Av
and type Bv isolates in the present study
(P = 0.14) or in comparison to the proportion of the
corresponding groups in the previous study (P
0.2)
(5). No apparent correlations were found between the
viabilities of the spores of the isolates and clinical findings (Tables
1 and 2). All isolates that produced viable spores were identified to
the species level as S. cerevisiae by standard genetic tests
for species determination; however, one isolate (isolate 21; Table 2)
which was tetraploid or near tetraploid gave rise to diploid or
near-diploid mating-competent segregants.
|
strains). This is additional
evidence that such isolates are very closely related.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the present study the incidence of vaginitis caused only by S. cerevisiae among patients suffering from vaginitis (0.4%; 19 of 4,943) was similar to that reported previously (11, 15). The patient population in the present study was from a specialty clinic to which patients with problematic conditions were referred. This is evidenced by the fact that more than a third of the patients had suffered a previous episode of vaginitis during the preceding 2 years. It has been reported that S. cerevisiae is more likely to be involved in chronic vaginal infections (15).
The results of the present study indicated that by these methods nine distinct strains were present among the 23 isolates. This result is depicted in the dendrogram generated from the software analysis (Fig. 2). However, it should be noted that this dendrogram does not give any special weight to bands used for the group A and group B subgrouping. Correlation of the genetic relationships with the available clinical and social data (Table 1 and Table 2) showed several interesting findings.
|
First, the strains that were isolated from multiple patients with symptomatic vaginitis presumptively caused by S. cerevisiae were indistinguishable. In fact, 90% (17 of 19) of the isolates had a genotype that was identical to that of at least one other isolate within the present study group. Apart from a single known association (see below) there appeared to be no obvious clinical or social similarities among the patients who were infected with indistinguishable strains of S. cerevisiae. The exception to this finding was for the isolates from patients 5 (isolates 6 and 13), 11 (isolate 14), and 12 (isolate 15). All three of these patients had genetically indistinguishable isolates (lanes 18 to 21; Fig. 1). After the genotypic analysis was completed, further information regarding a possible relationship among these patients was sought. This uncovered the fact that two were medical practitioners in the same clinic (nongynecological), and the third was a patient at that clinic.
Second, the same strain of S. cerevisiae was not always
isolated from a given patient. Of the three patients in the present study (patients 1, 5, and 8; Table 2) from whom an isolate was recovered at two different time points, an indistinguishable strain of
S. cerevisiae was isolated from only one of these patients (patient 5) on both occasions; for the other two patients genetically distinct strains were isolated at the different times. The
interpretation of this latter result is interesting, because it would
indicate that these patients either (i) are being serially infected
with different S. cerevisiae strains, (ii) are being
infected with a changing S. cerevisiae strain, or (iii) are
being infected with a mixed population of strains from which only one
S. cerevisiae strain was characterized in each instance.
Without characterizing an extremely large number of individual strains
from each patient, it is not possible to know if this last scenario may
be true. Furthermore, it is highly unlikely that a single strain would change during the course of vaginal infection, because, with the exception of one of these vaginal isolates (Table 2), all were able to
sporulate and were therefore (at least) diploid and have (at least) one
copy of both MATa and MAT
and so would not be able to mate. This excludes the possibility that mating of two
strains with different RFLP patterns would produce a new pattern.
Moreover, the expression of both MAT genes indicates that
the HO gene would not be transcribed, thus eliminating the possibility of a homothallic contribution, via recombination, to
alterations in the RFLP patterns. In addition, meiotic recombination would require that the strain undergo meiosis (sporulation), which many
of these strains do only very inefficiently (Table 2), even under ideal
laboratory conditions. Ideal sporulation conditions require a low
temperature (25 to 30°C) and a highly aerobic environment, and hence,
the vagina would be a very unfavorable environment for sporulation.
Moreover, many of these isolates which did sporulate did not yield
viable spores. Further investigation would be required to totally
eliminate both the second and third possible scenarios outlined above,
and the investigators feel that it is most likely that these patients
were infected serially with different S. cerevisiae strains.
Finally, one of the commercially available strains of S. cerevisiae (isolate 18; Table 2) was identical in all characteristics studied to the strains isolated from three different women (patients 1, 6, and 14) at the time when they were suffering from symptomatic vaginitis; these were presumed to be the same strains. The remaining three commercial strains were genetically indistinguishable from each other (isolates 16, 17, and 19; DNA type B1; Table 2). This would indicate that, at least in the geographic region studied, the commercial strains were somewhat homogeneous. The principal aim of this study was not to assess all possible commercially available yeasts at this location during the study period but only to obtain a random, representative sample. It was even more noteworthy, then, that one of these commercial yeasts was indistinguishable from that which was isolated from three patients.
Apart from those mentioned above, no association between the genotypic subgroup of the vaginal isolate and the use of a hormonal contraceptive, episodes of previous vaginitis, or sexual history (age of first coitus, homosexual versus heterosexual, type of sexual activity [oral, anal, or vaginal], and number of sexual partners) could be found. There was no correlation of genotype with morphological type or with growth on sugars. A possible exception was that 10 of 11 isolates with a droplike colonial type were of the group A genotype (versus 3 of 12 of the coral-like type). All the commercial isolates were of the coral type. These phenotypic methods would not likely be useful for any epidemiologic purposes.
The availability of photographs of the RFLPs of EcoRI-digested DNA generated in the previous study, which used the RFLP method for the assessment of the epidemiology of Saccharomyces (5), made it possible to digitize these images and compare the RFLPs of the DNAs of 60 previously analyzed Saccharomyces isolates with those of the isolates in the present study by using the gel analysis software. These analyses showed that no strains were common between the two studies. In the previous study (5) 32 genotypic subgroups were found among 49 clinical isolates. A similar diversity was found among the isolates from the present study: 9 genotypic subgroups for 19 clinical isolates. Statistical analysis of the number of distinct genotypic subgroups found per number of clinical isolates studied showed that the diversity among the clinical isolates was not statistically different between the two studies (P = 0.18).
The amount of contact that the general public has with S. cerevisiae is difficult to ascertain. The high incidence of home use of yeast (50%) reported here could be a cultural phenomenon, and the use of yeast for medicinal purposes (31% in the present study) may well be increasing in all Western cultures. It would appear that this amount of contact is not unusual for the study region because there was no significant difference in contact with commercial yeast between the control patients and those with vaginitis caused by S. cerevisiae.
A recent investigation which studied the molecular epidemiology and in vitro susceptibility patterns of clinical isolates of S. cerevisiae found 62 distinct DNA types among 76 clinical isolates (20). This previous investigation used pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of NotI-digested DNA for the molecular typing of these clinical isolates (20). Despite the genomic diversity of the isolates found by their method, those investigators identified clusters of identical isolates among different patients hospitalized concurrently in the same unit (20). These findings are similar to the results of the present study, which showed in six instances that a genetically indistinguishable strain was causing infection in multiple women. An association among the women was known for only one of these incidences. This finding is in contrast to those for other known vaginal pathogens, most notably, Candida albicans; it is well documented that the majority of women harbor C. albicans strains that are unique and that the same strain persists over prolonged periods (18). These findings raise several interesting questions.
Previous work (1, 3, 4, 6, 7) suggests that only a few nonclinical S. cerevisiae isolates possess properties associated with virulence. Hence, the pool of clinical isolates in Bergamo may be a subset of the S. cerevisiae isolates in the region, explaining the finding that the patients were infected with a small number of genetically distinct strains.
It is also not known how intimate the contact needs to be before individuals will share the same strain of S. cerevisiae. It would appear from the present study that sharing the same work environment and patient-to-medical doctor contact is sufficient to cause individuals to share S. cerevisiae strains. The first instance of transmission of S. cerevisiae between individuals was reported by Wilson et al. (19) in 1988. This finding was not supported by molecular epidemiological tools. The only other report of the level of intimacy required for the transmission of S. cerevisiae isolates between different individuals was that by Nyirjesy et al. (10). Those investigators presented evidence that the same strain of S. cerevisiae was isolated from the finger of the husband of one of their four patients and from the dough used in his pizza shop. This previous research would appear to be the first documentation of an industrial isolate of S. cerevisiae being the etiological agent of a human disease. The present study, however, may well be the first evidence that only casual contact is required for individuals to share indistinguishable strains of S. cerevisiae which may then cause disease.
The present study provides further evidence of a commercially available S. cerevisiae strain that has caused human disease; 3 of 16 cases of disease were associated with a commercial isolate. The previous report (10) used a methodology different from that used in the present study and found that one of four cases of disease was associated with a commercial isolate. Both studies provide strong evidence that S. cerevisiae can be inoculated from external sources into the vagina, where it can cause a symptomatic infection.
The results presented here do not support the previously made contention (5) that certain genetic subtypes are isolated preferentially from the vagina. However, this may also be associated with geographic differences. This previous contention was based on isolates from the United States (5). None of the isolates in the present study had the same DNA RFLP type as any of the 60 isolates from the previous study (5). It may well be that significant genetic differences exist among strains of S. cerevisiae available on the two continents and, furthermore, that they have the ability to colonize humans and cause disease.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENT |
|---|
This research was funded in part by a fellowship from the Commonwealth AIDS Research Grants Committee of the National Health and Medical Research Council of the Australian Federal Government.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Division of Infectious Diseases, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, 751 South Bascom Ave., San Jose, CA 95128-2699. Phone: (408) 885-4313. Fax: (408) 885-4306. E-mail: stevens{at}leland.stanford.edu.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Byron, J. K., K. V. Clemons, J. H. McCusker, R. W. Davis, and D. A. Stevens. 1995. Pathogenicity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in complement factor five-deficient mice. Infect. Immun. 63:478-485[Abstract]. |
| 2. | Cimolai, N., M. J. Gill, and D. Church. 1987. Saccharomyces cerevisiae fungemia: case report and review of the literature. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 8:113-117[Medline]. |
| 3. | Clemons, K. V., L. C. Hanson, and D. A. Stevens. 1996. Colony phenotype switching in clinical and non-clinical isolates of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Med. Vet. Mycol. 34:259-264[Medline]. |
| 4. | Clemons, K. V., J. H. McCusker, R. W. Davis, and D. A. Stevens. 1994. Comparative pathogenesis of clinical and nonclinical isolates of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Infect. Dis. 169:859-867[Medline]. |
| 5. | Clemons, K. V., P. Park, J. H. McCusker, M. J. McCullough, R. W. Davis, and D. A. Stevens. 1997. Application of DNA typing methods and genetic analysis to epidemiology and taxonomy of Saccharomyces. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:1822-1828[Abstract]. |
| 6. | McCusker, J. H., K. V. Clemons, D. A. Stevens, and R. W. Davis. 1994. Genetic characterization of pathogenic Saccharomyces cerevisiae isolates. Genetics 136:1261-1269[Abstract]. |
| 7. |
McCusker, J. H.,
K. V. Clemons,
D. A. Stevens, and R. W. Davis.
1994.
Saccharomyces cerevisiae virulence phenotype as determined with CD-1 mice is associated with the ability to grow at 42°C and form pseudohyphae.
Infect. Immun.
62:5447-5455 |
| 8. | Nei, M. 1987. Molecular evolutionary genetics. Columbia University Press, New York, N.Y. |
| 9. | Nielsen, H., J. Stenderup, and B. Bruun. 1990. Fungemia with Saccharomycetaceae. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 22:581-584[Medline]. |
| 10. | Nyirjesy, P., J. A. Vazquez, D. D. Ufberg, J. D. Sobel, D. A. Biokov, and H. R. Buckley. 1995. Saccharomyces cerevisiae vaginitis: transmission from yeast used in baking. Obstet. Gynecol. 86:326-329[Abstract]. |
| 11. | Odds, F. C. 1988. Ecology of Candida and epidemiology of candidiasis, p. 85-86. In F. C. Odds (ed.), Candida and candidiasis. Bailliere Tindall, London, United Kingdom. |
| 12. |
Quindós, G.,
M. Fernandez-Rodriguez,
A. Burgos,
M. Tellaetxe,
R. Cisterna, and J. Ponton.
1992.
Colony morphotype on Sabouraud-triphenyltetrazolium agar: a simple and inexpensive method for Candida subspecies discrimination.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
30:2748-2752 |
| 13. |
Scherer, S., and D. A. Stevens.
1987.
Application of DNA typing methods to epidemiology and taxonomy of Candida species.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
25:675-679 |
| 14. | Sherman, F., G. R. Fink, and C. W. Lawrence. 1974. Methods in yeast genetics: laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. |
| 15. | Sobel, J. D., J. A. Vazquez, M. Lynch, C. Meriwether, and M. J. Zervos. 1993. Vaginitis due to Saccharomyces cerevisiae: epidemiology, clinical aspects, and therapy. Clin. Infect. Dis. 16:93-99[Medline]. |
| 16. |
Soll, D. R.
1992.
High-frequency switching in Candida albicans.
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
5:183-203 |
| 17. |
Tawfik, O. W.,
C. J. Papasian,
A. Y. Dixon, and L. M. Potter.
1989.
Saccharomyces cerevisiae pneumonia in a patient with acquired immune deficiency syndrome.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
27:1689-1691 |
| 18. | Vazquez, J. A., J. D. Sobel, R. Demitriou, J. Vaishampayan, M. Lynch, and M. J. Zervos. 1994. Karyotyping of Candida albicans isolates obtained longitudinally in women with recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis. J. Infect. Dis. 170:1566-1569[Medline]. |
| 19. | Wilson, J. D., B. M. Jones, and G. R. Kinghorn. 1988. Bread-making as a source of vaginal infection with Saccharomyces cerevisiae: report of a case in a woman and apparent transmission to her partner. Sex. Transm. Dis. 15:35-36[Medline]. |
| 20. | Zerva, L., R. J. Hollis, and M. A. Pfaller. 1996. In vitro susceptibility testing and DNA typing of Saccharomyces cerevisiae clinical isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:3031-3034[Abstract]. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. | Clin. Microbiol. Rev. |
|---|---|
| Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |
|---|