Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 1998, p. 1122-1124, Vol. 36, No. 4
Unité de la Tuberculose et des
Mycobactéries, Institut Pasteur, Morne Jolivière, 97165 Pointe-à-Pitre, Guadeloupe, French West Indies
Received 31 October 1997/Returned for modification 22 December
1997/Accepted 14 January 1998
A total of 129 clinical isolates of Mycobacterium
tuberculosis representing 91 patients were typed by a
combination of direct-repeat (DR)-based spoligotyping and
an inter-IS6110-PGRS (polymorphic GC-rich region)-PCR,
also designated double-repetitive-element PCR (DRE-PCR). During the
first phase of this investigation, 72 clinical strains representing 52 patients were initially typed by IS6110-restriction
fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) and DR-RFLP, followed by
spoligotyping and DRE-PCR. In the second phase of this investigation,
the discriminating ability of spoligotyping plus DRE-PCR was studied
for 57 isolates from 39 patients who were suspected to be
epidemiologically linked, and the typing results were later confirmed
by IS6110-RFLP and DR-RFLP analyses. The molecular
clustering of the isolates remained identical irrespective of the
methods used. These results show that the association of two PCR-based
fingerprinting techniques for molecular epidemiology of tuberculosis
has a discriminating ability similar to the
IS6110-RFLP reference method.
Molecular fingerprinting of
Mycobacterium tuberculosis with the transposon
IS6110 (12) is useful for epidemiological studies (10), and an internationally accepted restriction fragment
length polymorphism (RFLP) procedure has been described previously
(13). However, the development of rapid typing methods
remains important, as IS6110-RFLP requires culturing, DNA
extraction, and Southern hybridization, and may take as long as 4 to 5 weeks. Moreover, IS6110 fingerprinting may be limited, as
some strains may not harbor a copy of IS6110 whereas others
may contain only 1 to 5 copies (14). In this context,
alternative PCR-based techniques seem particularly promising, as
they may help with both rapid diagnosis and molecular
typing of tuberculosis; however, the methods described may not be
sufficiently discriminatory when used alone (2, 6, 8). For
this reason, a combination of rapid methods with spoligotyping as a
first-line test was recently hypothesized as a potential alternative to
IS6110-RFLP (3). In this paper, we describe a
combination of spoligotyping (6) followed by double-repetitive-element (DRE)-PCR (2) as a rapid
alternative strategy for M. tuberculosis typing.
0095-1137/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Spoligotyping Followed by Double-Repetitive-Element PCR as
Rapid Alternative to IS6110 Fingerprinting for
Epidemiological Studies of Tuberculosis
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
TABLE 1.
Molecular description of clusters observed for 72 M. tuberculosis clinical isolates from 52 patients by
IS6110-RFLP and DR-RFLP analyses, followed by
spoligotyping and DRE-PCR
A total of 129 clinical isolates, representing 91 patients, that were isolated at the Pasteur Institute of Guadeloupe from 1994 to 1996 and identified as M. tuberculosis by classical mycobacteriology procedures were the subject of the present investigation. DNA was prepared by the CTAB (cetyltrimethylammonium bromide) method (13) for the IS6110-RFLP, direct-repeat (DR)-RFLP, and DRE-PCR procedures. For spoligotyping experiments, DNA was prepared by a microbead disruption method (1). IS6110-RFLP and DR-RFLP analyses were performed as reported previously (11, 13). Spoligotyping was performed with membranes that were prepared locally (6). DRE-PCR was performed as reported previously (2); a 20 25-µl aliquot of the PCR mixture was analyzed on 2% agarose gels, and pictures were taken after ethidium bromide staining by using a video-copy system and Gel-Analyst software (Bioprobe, Montreuil, France). IS6110-RFLP, DR-RFLP, and DRE-PCR results were analyzed with Taxotron software (Taxolab, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France), as reported previously (11). Spoligotyping results were entered in a spreadsheet (Excel) file and ordered for cluster identification.
When 72 clinical strains representing 52 patients were typed by IS6110-RFLP and DR-RFLP analyses, followed by spoligotyping and DRE-PCR, during the first phase of this investigation, a total of 17 patient isolates were grouped in three clusters; specific spoligotyping and DRE-PCR patterns are illustrated in Table 1. In the second phase of the investigation, the discriminating ability of spoligotyping followed by DRE-PCR was confirmed for 57 isolates from 39 patients who were suspected to be epidemiologically linked; a total of 28 patient isolates were grouped in 10 clusters, whereas the remaining patient isolates were unrelated upon DRE-PCR (Table 2). Concordant typing results were later obtained when the IS6110 reference method was used independently (Table 2).
|
Spoligotyping alone overestimated the number of clustered isolates in our region by about 16%, compared to IS6110-RFLP analysis, which was mainly due to the presence of common spoligotypes, such as those shown for clusters E, F, and K (Table 2), present around the world. This discrepancy was overcome following DRE-PCR, with final clustering results identical to those observed with IS6110-RFLP analysis (Table 2). The diversity of DRE-PCR patterns generated for unclustered isolates is represented in Fig. 1A and B, whereas the representative profiles for some of the clustered isolates are illustrated in Fig. 1C. These results confirmed that spoligotyping plus DRE-PCR showed a discriminatory power equal to that of IS6110-RFLP.
|
Consequently, the present investigation validates a new strategy for M. tuberculosis typing which associates two PCR-based fingerprinting techniques for molecular epidemiology of tuberculosis with excellent discriminating ability: ultimately, all the results obtained were confirmed by the IS6110-RFLP reference methodology. By using spoligotyping in association with DRE-PCR, we studied the polymorphisms contained inside the DR locus (5) and between the IS6110 and PGRS (polymorphic GC-rich region) (9) loci. This study demonstrates that spoligotyping is useful as a first-line screening method; however, clustering should be reconfirmed by DRE-PCR to retain only epidemiologically linked isolates. Based on the available genetic information for the type strain, H37Rv (7), seven potential loci may be amplified by DRE-PCR alone, showing the discriminatory potential of this method as a second-line test. We suggest that the current combination of spoligotyping followed by IS6110-RFLP analysis (4) could be satisfactorily replaced by spoligotyping followed by DRE-PCR, which may help gain a minimum of 2 weeks if the procedure begins upon receipt of a patient's specimen. Unlike IS6110-RFLP analysis, which requires about 5 µg of bacterial DNA in a nonradioactive hybridization format, spoligotyping and DRE-PCR require only about 10 and 100 ng of DNA, respectively. Thus, in the latter case, it is possible to proceed with the microcolonies that are visible within 2 weeks on Middlebrook agar medium instead of the 3 to 4 weeks necessary for a fully grown culture for IS6110-RFLP analysis. A further gain of about 4 to 5 days is achieved due to the simplicity of the spoligotyping plus DRE-PCR procedures over IS6110-RFLP analysis. Although most of the experience we acquired on this technique was done with CTAB-prepared DNA, it has been shown that DRE-PCR can also be performed with less-purified DNA (2). We noticed that amplification yields were lower when DNA prepared by microbeads was used, and weak amplification bands were sometimes lost.
It should be emphasized that spoligotyping plus DRE-PCR gave essentially the same typing results as those obtained by IS6110-RFLP analysis; the results were identical (the same number of clusters, the same isolates in each cluster, and the same unclustered isolates) for 87 of 91 patients studied (4 patient isolates did not give visible bands upon DRE-PCR, which involved 4 unclustered isolates in this study). The use of DRE-PCR as a first-line test cannot be recommended, as it is not sufficiently discriminatory when used alone and both the low (below 200 bp)- and high (above 3,500 bp)-molecular-size bands may be difficult to interpret and compare. Furthermore, interpretation of the results may be tedious when hundreds of isolates on separate gels are compared. In this sense, initial screening by spoligotyping limits the number of potentially linked isolates prior to DRE-PCR. In conclusion, the strategy described in this article is easily applicable to the handling of a very large number of samples and would be well suited to developing countries and/or countries with high prevalences of tuberculosis.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We are grateful to the "Délégation générale du Réseau International des Instituts Pasteur" for organizing a workshop on spoligotyping under the expert guidance of B. Gicquel and Y. Goguet de la Salmonière, Institut Pasteur, Paris.
This work was financed by a research grant provided by the Fondation Française Raoul Follereau, Paris, France.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Institut Pasteur, Morne Jolivière, B.P. 484, F-97165 Pointe-à-Pitre Cedex, Guadeloupe, French West Indies. Phone: 590-893-881. Fax: 590-893-880. E-mail: rastogi{at}ipagua.gp.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
Top
Abstract
Text
References
|
|---|
| 1. | Devallois, A., K. S. Goh, and N. Rastogi. 1997. Rapid identification of mycobacteria to species level by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of the hsp65 gene and proposition of an algorithm to differentiate 34 mycobacterial species. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:2969-2973[Abstract]. |
| 2. | Friedman, C. R., M. Y. Stoeckle, W. D. Johnson, Jr., and L. W. Riley. 1995. Double-repetitive-element PCR Method for subtyping Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:1383-1384[Abstract]. |
| 3. | Goguet, Y. O., H. M. Li, G. Torrea, A. Bunschoten, J. D. A. van Embden, and B. Gicquel. 1997. Evaluation of spoligotyping in a study of the transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:2210-2214[Abstract]. |
| 4. | Goyal, M., N. A. Saunders, J. D. A. van Embden, D. B. Young, and R. J. Shaw. 1997. Differentiation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates by spoligotyping and IS6110 restriction fragment length polymorphism. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:647-651[Abstract]. |
| 5. | Groenen, P. M. A., A. E. Bunschoten, D. van Soolingen, and J. D. A. van Embden. 1993. Nature of DNA polymorphism in the direct repeat cluster of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: application for strain differentiation by a novel typing method. Mol. Microbiol. 10:1057-1065[Medline]. |
| 6. | Kamerbeek, J., L. Schouls, M. van Agterveld, D. van Soolingen, S. Kuijper, A. Bunschoten, H. Molhuizen, R. Shaw, M. Goyal, and J. van Embden. 1997. Simultaneous detection and strain differentiation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis for diagnosis and epidemiology. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:907-914[Abstract]. |
| 7. |
Philipp, W. J.,
S. Poulet,
K. Eiglmeier,
L. Pascopella,
V. Balasubramanian,
B. Heym,
S. Bergh,
B. R. Bloom,
W. Jacobs, and S. T. Cole.
1996.
An integrated map of the genome of the tubercle bacillus, Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv, and comparison with Mycobacterium leprae.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:3132-3137 |
| 8. |
Plykaitis, B. P.,
J. T. Crawford,
C. L. Woodley,
W. R. Butler,
K. D. Eisenach,
M. D. Cave, and T. M. Shinnick.
1993.
Rapid, amplification-based fingerprinting of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
J. Gen. Microbiol.
139:1537-1542 |
| 9. |
Ross, B. C.,
K. Raios,
K. Jackson, and B. Dwyer.
1992.
Molecular cloning of a highly repeated DNA element from Mycobacterium tuberculosis and its use as an epidemiological tool.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
30:942-946 |
| 10. | Small, P. M., and J. D. A. van Embden. 1994. Molecular epidemiology of tuberculosis, p. 569-582. In B. R. Bloom (ed.), Tuberculosis: pathogenesis, protection, and control. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C. |
| 11. | Sola, C., L. Horgen, K. S. Goh, and N. Rastogi. 1997. Molecular fingerprinting of Mycobacterium tuberculosis on a Caribbean island with IS6110 and DRr probes. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:843-846[Abstract]. |
| 12. |
Thierry, D.,
A. Brisson-Noël,
V. Vincent-Levy-Frébault,
S. Nguyen,
J. L. Guesdon, and B. Gicquel.
1990.
Characterization of a Mycobacterium tuberculosis insertion sequence, IS6110, and its application in diagnosis.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
28:2668-2673 |
| 13. |
van Embden, J. D. A.,
M. D. Cave,
J. T. Crawford,
J. W. Dale,
K. D. Eisenach,
B. Gicquel,
P. Hermans,
C. Martin,
R. McAdam,
T. M. Shinnick, and P. M. Small.
1993.
Strain identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by DNA fingerprinting: recommendations for a standardized methodology.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
31:406-409 |
| 14. |
Yuen, L. K. W.,
B. C. Ross,
K. M. Jackson, and B. Dwyer.
1993.
Characterization of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains from Vietnamiese patients by Southern blot hybridization.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
31:1615-1618 |
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 1998, p. 1122-1124, Vol. 36, No. 4
0095-1137/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Augustynowicz-Kopec, E., Jagielski, T., Zwolska, Z.
(2008). Genetic Diversity of Isoniazid-Resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis Isolates Collected in Poland and Assessed by Spoligotyping. J. Clin. Microbiol.
46: 4041-4044
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Sun, Y.-J., Lee, A. S. G., Ng, S. T., Ravindran, S., Kremer, K., Bellamy, R., Wong, S.-Y., van Soolingen, D., Supply, P., Paton, N. I.
(2004). Characterization of Ancestral Mycobacterium tuberculosis by Multiple Genetic Markers and Proposal of Genotyping Strategy. J. Clin. Microbiol.
42: 5058-5064
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Brudey, K., Gordon, M., Mostrom, P., Svensson, L., Jonsson, B., Sola, C., Ridell, M., Rastogi, N.
(2004). Molecular Epidemiology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Western Sweden. J. Clin. Microbiol.
42: 3046-3051
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Warren, R. M., Streicher, E. M., Sampson, S. L., van der Spuy, G. D., Richardson, M., Nguyen, D., Behr, M. A., Victor, T. C., van Helden, P. D.
(2002). Microevolution of the Direct Repeat Region of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: Implications for Interpretation of Spoligotyping Data. J. Clin. Microbiol.
40: 4457-4465
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
de Viedma, D. G., Marin, M., Hernangomez, S., Diaz, M., Serrano, M. J. R., Alcala, L., Bouza, E.
(2002). Tuberculosis Recurrences: Reinfection Plays a Role in a Population Whose Clinical/Epidemiological Characteristics Do Not Favor Reinfection. Arch Intern Med
162: 1873-1879
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Bandera, A., Gori, A., Catozzi, L., Esposti, A. D., Marchetti, G., Molteni, C., Ferrario, G., Codecasa, L., Penati, V., Matteelli, A., Franzetti, F.
(2001). Molecular Epidemiology Study of Exogenous Reinfection in an Area with a Low Incidence of Tuberculosis. J. Clin. Microbiol.
39: 2213-2218
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Sola, C., Ferdinand, S., Mammina, C., Nastasi, A., Rastogi, N.
(2001). Genetic Diversity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Sicily Based on Spoligotyping and Variable Number of Tandem DNA Repeats and Comparison with a Spoligotyping Database for Population-Based Analysis. J. Clin. Microbiol.
39: 1559-1565
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Filliol, I., Ferdinand, S., Negroni, L., Sola, C., Rastogi, N.
(2000). Molecular Typing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Based on Variable Number of Tandem DNA Repeats Used Alone and in Association with Spoligotyping. J. Clin. Microbiol.
38: 2520-2524
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Jasmer, R. M., Daley, C. L., Hopewell, P. C.
(2000). Trends in Tuberculosis Transmission. ANN INTERN MED
132: 416-417
[Full Text] -
Soini, H., Pan, X., Amin, A., Graviss, E. A., Siddiqui, A., Musser, J. M.
(2000). Characterization of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Isolates from Patients in Houston, Texas, by Spoligotyping. J. Clin. Microbiol.
38: 669-676
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Bonora, S., Gutierrez, M. C., Di Perri, G., Brunello, F., Allegranzi, B., Ligozzi, M., Fontana, R., Concia, E., Vincent, V.
(1999). Comparative Evaluation of Ligation-Mediated PCR and Spoligotyping as Screening Methods for Genotyping of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Strains. J. Clin. Microbiol.
37: 3118-3123
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Bauer, J., Andersen, A. B., Kremer, K., Miörner, H.
(1999). Usefulness of Spoligotyping To Discriminate IS6110 Low-Copy-Number Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex Strains Cultured in Denmark. J. Clin. Microbiol.
37: 2602-2606
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Montoro, E., Valdivia, J., Leão, S. C.
(1998). Molecular Fingerprinting of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Isolates Obtained in Havana, Cuba, by IS6110 Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Analysis and by the Double-Repetitive-Element PCR Method. J. Clin. Microbiol.
36: 3099-3102
[Abstract] [Full Text]
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»