Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, May 1998, p. 1330-1332, Vol. 36, No. 5
0095-1137/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Comparative Evaluation of National Committee for
Clinical Laboratory Standards Broth Macrodilution and Agar Dilution
Screening Methods for Testing Fluconazole Susceptibility of
Cryptococcus neoformans
William R.
Kirkpatrick,1
Robert K.
McAtee,1
Sanjay G.
Revankar,2
Annette W.
Fothergill,2
Dora I.
McCarthy,2
Michael G.
Rinaldi,1,2 and
Thomas F.
Patterson1,3,*
Departments of
Medicine1 and
Pathology,2 University of Texas Health
Science Center at San Antonio, and
Audie Murphy Division,
South Texas Veterans Health Care System,3 San
Antonio, Texas 78284
Received 29 September 1997/Returned for modification 8 December
1997/Accepted 6 February 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
A simple screening method for fluconazole susceptibility of
Cryptococcus neoformans using 2% dextrose Sabouraud
dextrose agar (SabDex) with fluconazole was compared to the National
Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) broth macrodilution method. By this method, fluconazole-susceptible C. neoformans isolates are significantly smaller on medium with
fluconazole than on fluconazole-free medium. Isolates with decreased
susceptibility have normal-size colonies on medium containing
fluconazole. The 48-h NCCLS broth macrodilution MICs (NCCLS MICs) for
isolates with normal-size colonies on 8- or 16-µg/ml fluconazole
plates were predicted to be
8 or
16 µg/ml, respectively. On
medium with 16 µg of fluconazole per ml, all strains (84 of 84) for
which the NCCLS MICs were <16 µg/ml were correctly predicted, as
were all isolates (7 of 7) for which the MICs were
16 µg/ml. Agar dilution appears to be an effective screening method for fluconazole resistance in C. neoformans.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Serious fungal infections in
immunocompromised patients are increasing in frequency (3-5,
10). Cryptococcal meningitis, caused by Cryptococcus
neoformans, remains incurable in the population with AIDS (2,
4, 13). In this setting, the necessary long-term suppressive
therapy with antifungal agents may lead to selection of resistant
isolates (4, 6). Clinical resistance in Candida spp. is becoming a serious problem (7, 11, 21). While
antifungal resistance in Cryptococcus is uncommon, the MICs
for some isolates are elevated (4, 6). A rapid, reproducible
method for detecting fluconazole resistance would be useful in
determining the epidemiology of and optimal treatment for resistant
isolates (9, 18, 20).
Recently, a standardized broth macrodilution technique for yeast
susceptibility testing has been accepted (9, 12). This technique requires considerable time and expense and is not easily applicable for screening purposes, even with microdilution
modifications (1). The National Committee for Clinical
Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) method for fluconazole susceptibility
testing of invasive yeasts includes both Candida spp. and
C. neoformans (19) yet establishes susceptibility
breakpoints for only Candida spp. (12). The
utility of susceptibility testing of C. neoformans remains controversial (10, 12, 17, 22). We have developed a
susceptibility screening method by adding fluconazole to 2% dextrose
Sabouraud dextrose agar (2% SabDex) which allows detection of yeasts
with decreased fluconazole susceptibility (14, 15). In this
study, agar screening was compared with the NCCLS macrodilution method for determining fluconazole susceptibility of C. neoformans.
(This study was presented in part at the 97th General Meeting of the
American Society for Microbiology, Miami Beach, Fla., 4 to 8 May 1997 [abstr. F85].)
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Clinical isolates.
Ninety-one clinical C. neoformans isolates that were submitted to the University of Texas
Health Science Center Fungus Testing Laboratory (San Antonio, Tex.) and
Yale-New Haven Hospital (New Haven, Conn.) for MIC determination by
NCCLS methodology (12) were subcultured and evaluated
blindly by the agar dilution method.
2 and 4% SabDex.
Two-percent dextrose Sabouraud liquid
broth modified antibiotic medium 13 (BBL, Cockeysville, Md.), which
contains a final concentration of 20 g of dextrose per liter, was
prepared from a powdered medium as suggested by the manufacturer. Bacto
Agar (15 g/liter; Difco Laboratories, Detroit, Mich.) was added to a
1.5% final concentration. In addition, 4% SabDex (BBL), which contains a final dextrose concentration of 40 g/liter and agar at 15 g/liter, was prepared from a powdered medium as suggested by the
manufacturer. Each medium was brought to a boil in sterile water for 15 to 30 s to dissolve the powdered medium and the agar and was
cooled to 45°C in a water bath. Fluconazole intravenous solution (2 mg/ml; Pfizer-Roerig, New York, N.Y.) was added to the media at 45°C,
with thorough stirring, to give final concentrations of 8 and 16 µg
of fluconazole per ml. These solutions were maintained at 45°C and
thoroughly stirred. Approximately 20 ml was poured into sterile
100-mm-diameter petri plates and allowed to cool and harden before use.
Hardened plates were stored at 4°C for up to 1 week prior to use.
CHROMagar Candida.
CHROMagar Candida (CHROMagar, Paris,
France) was prepared from powdered medium according to the
manufacturer's instructions, with the addition of fluconazole to give
8- and 16-µg/ml concentrations. The prepared medium, which contains
chloramphenicol (0.5 g/liter) and agar (15 g/liter), was dispensed (20 ml) into plates and stored as described above.
Plating and interpretation: susceptibility testing.
Fluconazole was added to the media to differentiate resistant yeasts
from susceptible yeasts. From each isolate stock (several isolated
colonies placed in 3 ml of sterile, deionized H2O), a sterile 10-µl loop was used to inoculate a set of three medium plates
containing 0, 8, and 16 µg of fluconazole per ml. Samples were
applied to one half of each plate. Plates were incubated at 30°C for
48 and 72 h prior to assessment of growth. Results from the
fluconazole-containing medium were recorded as susceptible or
mycologically resistant based on growth characteristics. Colonies that
demonstrated growth on medium with fluconazole (usually visualized as
pinpoint-sized colonies) that was suppressed compared to growth on
medium without fluconazole were recorded as susceptible (Fig. 1). Colonies that demonstrated growth
that was indistinguishable on medium with or without fluconazole were
recorded as mycologically resistant. Results in this study were
independently read by two laboratory personnel. Agar dilution
susceptibility was tested on groups of 15 to 25 isolates. Control
isolates with known susceptibilities were included for comparison with
test samples.

View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Growth of susceptible C. neoformans (tops of
plates) and C. neoformans with decreased fluconazole
susceptibility (bottoms of plates) on 2% SabDex without fluconazole
(A) and on 2% SabDex with 8 µg of fluconazole per ml (B).
|
|
 |
RESULTS |
Ninety-one clinical isolates of C. neoformans were
evaluated by broth macrodilution testing and by agar dilution. A wide
range of fluconazole MICs (
0.125 to >64 µg/ml) were detected, with 13 of 91 isolates (14%) inhibited by
8 µg/ml (48-h NCCLS broth macrodilution MICs [referred to hereafter in this work as NCCLS MICs]). Growth of susceptible C. neoformans isolates could
be easily differentiated from resistant yeast isolates on
fluconazole-containing agar by colony morphology. On 2% SabDex without
fluconazole (Fig. 1A), growth characteristics of the susceptible
C. neoformans (Fig. 1A, top) and C. neoformans
with decreased fluconazole susceptibility (Fig. 1A, bottom) could not
be distinguished. Fluconazole-impregnated medium allowed distinction of
fluconazole-susceptible C. neoformans isolates (Fig. 1, tops
of plates) from C. neoformans with decreased susceptibility
(Fig. 1, bottoms of plates). The fluconazole-containing medium
suppressed growth of the susceptible strain (Fig. 1B), seen as only
pinpoint colonies (Fig. 1B, top), whereas colonies with decreased
fluconazole susceptibility were seen to have normal growth
characteristics (Fig. 1B, bottom).
Medium containing 8 µg of fluconazole per ml correctly detected 72 of
81 strains for which the NCCLS MICs were <8 µg/ml and 9 of 10 strains for which the NCCLS MICs were
8 µg/ml as well (Table
1). One isolate for which the NCCLS MIC
was predicted to be <8 µg/ml was found to be inhibited by 8 µg/ml
(NCCLS MIC), while nine isolates for which the NCCLS MICs were
predicted to be
8 µg/ml were inhibited by 1 (n = 1), 2 (n = 3), and 4 (n = 5) µg/ml
(NCCLS MICs). Overall agreement on the 8-µg/ml fluconazole plates was
within 1 log2 broth macrodilution for 87 of 91 isolates (96%). 2% SabDex agar containing 16 µg of fluconazole per ml
correctly detected 84 of 84 strains for which the NCCLS MICs were <16
µg/ml as well as 7 of 7 strains for which the NCCLS MICs were
16
µg/ml (Table 2).
Studies using either 4% SabDex or CHROMagar medium were less
successful in determining susceptibility. 4% SabDex or CHROMagar containing 8 µg of fluconazole per ml correctly detected 7 of 17 strains (41%) or 9 of 17 strains (53%), respectively, for which the
NCCLS MICs were <8 µg/ml, and 6 of 6 strains (both media) for which
the NCCLS MICs were
8 µg/ml. Examination of these isolates on
either 4% SabDex or CHROMagar medium containing 16 µg of fluconazole per ml correctly detected 13 of 20 strains (65%) or 9 of 20 strains (45%), respectively, for which the NCCLS MICs were <16 µg/ml and 3 of 3 (both media) strains for which the NCCLS MICs were
16 µg/ml.
The sensitivities of correctly predicting yeasts with increased
resistances by normal colony growth on 2% SabDex medium containing 8 or 16 µg of fluconazole per ml were 90 and 100%, respectively. The
specificities of correctly predicting isolates to be fluconazole susceptible based on suppressed growth on 2% SabDex media containing fluconazole at either 8 or 16 µg/ml were 89 and 100%, respectively.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Screening C. neoformans for susceptibility to
antifungals has been difficult. In the present studies, 2% SabDex
containing 8 µg of fluconazole per ml correctly detected 89% of the
clinical C. neoformans isolates for which the NCCLS MICs
were <8 µg/ml and 90% of the strains for which the NCCLS MICs were
8 µg/ml. Medium containing 16 µg of fluconazole per ml correctly
detected all isolates for which the NCCLS MICs were <16 µg/ml as
well as all isolates for which the NCCLS MICs were
16 µg/ml.
Overall, agreement was within 1 log2 broth tube
macrodilution for 87 of 91 isolates (96%) on the 8-µg/ml fluconazole
medium and 91 of 91 isolates (100%) on the 16-µg/ml fluconazole
medium. While this screening method correlates well with the NCCLS
M27-A method, the clinical significance of C. neoformans
susceptibility testing remains unclear (15).
The sensitivity of correctly predicting mycologically resistant yeasts
by normal colony growth on medium containing 8- or 16-µg/ml
fluconazole was 100% with either 4% SabDex or CHROMagar. However, the
specificities of correctly predicting isolates to be fluconazole
susceptible based on suppressed growth on medium containing fluconazole
at either 8 or 16 µg/ml were 41 and 65%, respectively, on 4% SabDex
medium and 53 and 45%, respectively, on CHROMagar medium containing
fluconazole. Thus, 2% SabDex appeared superior to these other media
for susceptibility screening. The use of Yeast Nitrogen Base agar could
possibly have improved the growth of C. neoformans but was
not tested in this study (10, 12, 22). Data obtained in
these experiments supports previous observations that medium-specific
differences pertaining to MIC determination exist (5, 8, 12, 16,
22).
The use of 2% SabDex medium with fluconazole appears to be a rapid,
simple, and sensitive method for detection of fluconazole-resistant yeasts. Additional studies should be conducted to determine the utility
of this method in screening clinical samples and in establishing the
optimal management of resistant cryptococcal infections.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health/National
Institute for Dental Research grant 5 R01-DE11381, by grant M01-RR-01346 to the Frederic C. Bartter General Clinical Research Center of the South Texas Veterans Medical Center, San Antonio, and by
Pfizer, Inc. Chromogenic medium was kindly provided by CHROMagar
Candida.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr., San Antonio, TX
78284-7881. Phone: (210) 567-4823. Fax: (210) 567-4670. E-mail: PATTERSON{at}UTHSCSA.EDU.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Barchesi, F.,
A. L. Colombo,
D. A. McGough, and M. G. Rinaldi.
1994.
Comparative study of broth macrodilution and microdilution techniques for in vitro antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts by using the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards' proposed standard.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
32:2494-2500[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Barchesi, F.,
R. J. Hollis,
S. A. Messer,
G. Scalise,
M. G. Rinaldi, and M. A. Pfaller.
1995.
Electrophoretic karyotype and in vitro susceptibility of Cryptococcus neoformans isolates from AIDS patients.
Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.
23:99-103[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Brandt, M. E.,
M. A. Pfaller,
R. A. Hajjeh,
E. A. Gravis,
J. Rees,
E. D. Spitzer,
R. W. Pinner,
L. W. Mayer, and the Cryptococcal Disease Active Surveillance Group.
1996.
Molecular subtypes and antifungal susceptibilities of serial Cryptococcus neoformans isolates in human immunodeficiency virus-associated cryptococcosis.
J. Infect. Dis.
174:812-820[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Casadevall, A.,
E. D. Spitzer,
D. Webb, and M. G. Rinaldi.
1993.
Susceptibilities of serial Cryptococcus neoformans isolates from patients with recurrent cryptococcal meningitis to amphotericin B and fluconazole.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
37:1383-1386[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Chen, S. C. A.,
M. L. O'Donnell,
S. Gordon, and G. L. Gilbert.
1996.
Antifungal susceptibility testing using the E-test: comparison with the broth macrodilution technique.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
37:265-273[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Colombo, A. L.,
F. Barchiesi,
D. A. McGough, and M. G. Rinaldi.
1995.
Comparison of E-test and National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards broth macrodilution method for azole antifungal susceptibility testing.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
33:535-540[Abstract].
|
| 7.
|
Dermoumi, H.
1992.
In vitro susceptibility of yeast isolates from the blood to fluconazole and amphotericin B.
Chemotherapy
38:112-117[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Espinel-Ingroff, A.,
L. Steele-Moore, and J. N. Galgiani.
1994.
Evaluation of 80% inhibition standards for the determination of fluconazole minimum inhibitory concentrations in three laboratories.
Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.
20:81-86[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Fromtling, R. A.,
J. N. Galgiani,
M. Pfaller,
A. Espinel-Ingroff,
K. F. Bartizal,
M. S. Bartlett,
B. A. Body,
C. Frey,
G. Hall,
G. D. Roberts,
F. B. Nolte,
F. C. Odds,
M. G. Rinaldi,
A. M. Sugar, and K. Villareal.
1993.
Multicenter evaluation of a broth macrodilution antifungal susceptibility test for yeasts.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
37:39-45[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Ghannoum, M. A.,
Y. Fu,
A. S. Ibrahim,
L. A. Mortara,
M. C. Shafiq,
J. E. Edwards, Jr., and R. S. Criddle.
1995.
In vitro determination of optimal antifungal combinations against Cryptococcus neoformans and Candida albicans.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
39:2459-2465[Abstract].
|
| 11.
|
Millon, L.,
A. Manteaux,
G. Reboux,
C. Drobacheff,
M. Monod,
T. Barale, and Y. Michel-Briand.
1994.
Fluconazole-resistant recurrent oral candidiasis in human immunodeficiency virus-positive patients: persistence of Candida albicans strains with the same genotype.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
32:1115-1118[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards.
1997.
Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts; approved standard. NCCLS document M27-A.
National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
|
| 13.
| Patterson, T. F. 1997. Cryptococcosis in
HIV-infected and non-HIV-infected hosts. Int. J. Infect. Dis.
1(Suppl. 1):S64-S69.
|
| 14.
|
Patterson, T. F.,
W. R. Kirkpatrick,
S. G. Revankar,
R. K. McAtee,
A. W. Fothergill,
D. I. McCarthy, and M. G. Rinaldi.
1996.
Comparative evaluation of macrodilution and chromogenic agar screening for fluconazole susceptibility of Candida albicans.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
34:3237-3239[Abstract].
|
| 15.
|
Patterson, T. F.,
S. G. Revankar,
W. R. Kirkpatrick,
O. P. Dib,
A. W. Fothergill,
S. W. Redding,
D. A. Sutton, and M. G. Rinaldi.
1996.
Simple method for detecting fluconazole-resistant yeasts with chromogenic agar.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
34:1794-1797[Abstract].
|
| 16.
|
Pfaller, M. A., and A. L. Berry.
1994.
Evaluation of a novel colorimetric broth microdilution method for antifungal susceptibility testing of yeast isolates.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
32:1992-1996[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Powderley, W. G.
1996.
Editorial response: management of cryptococcal meningitis have we answered all the questions?
Clin. Infect. Dis.
22:329-330[Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Rex, J. H.,
M. A. Pfaller,
A. L. Barry,
P. W. Nelson, and C. W. Webb.
1995.
Antifungal susceptibility testing of isolates from a randomized, multicenter trial of fluconazole versus amphotericin B as treatment of nonneutropenic patients with candidemia.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
39:40-44[Abstract].
|
| 19.
|
Rex, J. H.,
M. A. Pfaller,
J. N. Galgiani,
M. S. Bartlett,
A. Espinel-Ingroff,
M. A. Ghannoum,
M. Lancaster,
F. C. Odds,
M. G. Rinaldi,
T. J. Walsh, and A. L. Berry.
1997.
Development of interpretive breakpoints for antifungal susceptibility testing: conceptual framework and analysis of in vitro-in vivo correlation data for fluconazole, itraconazole, and candida infections.
Clin. Infect. Dis.
24:235-247[Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Rex, J. H.,
M. A. Pfaller,
M. G. Rinaldi,
A. Polak, and J. N. Galgiani.
1993.
Antifungal susceptibility testing.
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
6:367-381[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Rex, J. H.,
M. G. Rinaldi, and M. A. Pfaller.
1995.
Resistance of Candida species to fluconazole.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
39:1-8[Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Witt, M. D.,
R. J. Lewis,
R. A. Larsen,
E. N. Milefchik,
M. A. E. Leal,
R. H. Haubrich,
J. A. Richie,
J. E. Edwards, Jr., and M. A. Ghannoum.
1996.
Identification of patients with acute AIDS-associated cryptococcal meningitis who can be effectively treated with fluconazole: the role of antifungal susceptibility testing.
Clin. Infect. Dis.
22:322-328[Medline].
|
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, May 1998, p. 1330-1332, Vol. 36, No. 5
0095-1137/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Lalitha, P., Shapiro, B. L., Srinivasan, M., Prajna, N. V., Acharya, N. R., Fothergill, A. W., Ruiz, J., Chidambaram, J. D., Maxey, K. J., Hong, K. C., McLeod, S. D., Lietman, T. M.
(2007). Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Fusarium, Aspergillus, and Other Filamentous Fungi Isolated From Keratitis. Arch Ophthalmol
125: 789-793
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Yamazumi, T., Pfaller, M. A., Messer, S. A., Houston, A. K., Boyken, L., Hollis, R. J., Furuta, I., Jones, R. N.
(2003). Characterization of Heteroresistance to Fluconazole among Clinical Isolates of Cryptococcus neoformans. J. Clin. Microbiol.
41: 267-272
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Mondon, P., Petter, R., Amalfitano, G., Luzzati, R., Concia, E., Polacheck, I., Kwon-Chung, K. J.
(1999). Heteroresistance to Fluconazole and Voriconazole in Cryptococcus neoformans. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
43: 1856-1861
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Jessup, C. J., Pfaller, M. A., Messer, S. A., Zhang, J., Tumberland, M., Mbidde, E. K., Ghannoum, M. A.
(1998). Fluconazole Susceptibility Testing of Cryptococcus neoformans: Comparison of Two Broth Microdilution Methods and Clinical Correlates among Isolates from Ugandan AIDS Patients. J. Clin. Microbiol.
36: 2874-2876
[Abstract]
[Full Text]